Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5
Uncertainty and Consumer Behavior
5.3 Reducing Risk 5.4 The Demand for Risky Assets 5.5 Behavioral Economics
2 of 34
2. We will examine peoples preferences toward risk. 3. We will see how people can sometimes reduce or eliminate risk. 4. In some situations, people must choose the amount of risk they wish to bear. In the final section of this chapter, we offer an overview of the flourishing field of behavioral economics.
3 of 34
5.1
DESCRIBING RISK
Probability
probability Likelihood that a given outcome will occur.
Expected Value
expected value Probability-weighted average of the payoffs associated with all possible outcomes. payoff Value associated with a possible outcome.
The expected value measures the central tendencythe payoff or value that we would expect on average. Expected value = Pr(success)($40/share) + Pr(failure)($20/share) = (1/4)($40/share) + (3/4)($20/share) = $25/share E(X) = Pr1X1 + Pr2X2 E(X) = Pr1X1 + Pr2X2 + . . . + PrnXn
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 7e.
4 of 34
5.1
DESCRIBING RISK
Variability
variability differ.
Chapter 5 Uncertainty and Consumer Behavior
TABLE 5.1
OUTCOME 2
Probability
.5
.99
2000
1510
.5
.01
1000
510
1500
1500
deviation
TABLE 5.2
Job 1 Job 2
5 of 34
5.1
DESCRIBING RISK
Variability
Table 5.3
Chapter 5 Uncertainty and Consumer Behavior
2000 1510
The distribution of payoffs associated with Job 1 has a greater spread and a greater standard deviation than the distribution of payoffs associated with Job 2. Both distributions are flat because all outcomes are equally likely. 2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 7e.
6 of 34
5.1
Figure 5.2
DESCRIBING RISK
Variability
Unequal Probability Outcomes
The distribution of payoffs associated with Job 1 has a greater spread and a greater standard deviation than the distribution of payoffs associated with Job 2.
Both distributions are peaked because the extreme payoffs are less likely than those near the middle of the distribution.
Decision Making
Table 5.4 Incomes from Sales JobsModified ($)
Deviation Squared 250,000 100 Deviation Squared 250,000 980,100 Expected Income 1600 1500 Standard Deviation 500 99.5
7 of 34
5.1
DESCRIBING RISK
Fines may be better than incarceration in deterring certain types of crimes, such as speeding, doubleparking, tax evasion, and air polluting.
Other things being equal, the greater the fine, the more a potential criminal will be discouraged from committing the crime. In practice, however, it is very costly to catch lawbreakers. Therefore, we save on administrative costs by imposing relatively high fines.
A policy that combines a high fine and a low probability of apprehension is likely to reduce enforcement costs.
8 of 34
5.2
Figure 5.3
In (a), a consumers marginal utility diminishes as income increases. The consumer is risk averse because she would prefer a certain income of $20,000 (with a utility of 16) to a gamble with a .5 probability of $10,000 and a .5 probability of $30,000 (and expected utility of 14).
9 of 34
5.2
Figure 5.3
In (b), the consumer is risk loving: She would prefer the same gamble (with expected utility of 10.5) to the certain income (with a utility of 8).
Finally, the consumer in (c) is risk neutral, and indifferent between certain and uncertain events with the same expected income.
expected utility Sum of the utilities associated with all possible outcomes, weighted by the probability that each outcome will occur.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 7e.
10 of 34
5.2
risk loving Condition of preferring a risky income to a certain income with the same expected value.
11 of 34
5.2
The risk premium, CF, measures the amount of income that an individual would give up to leave her indifferent between a risky choice and a certain one. Here, the risk premium is $4000 because a certain income of $16,000 (at point C) gives her the same expected utility (14) as the uncertain income (a .5 probability of being at point A and a .5 probability of being at point E) that has an expected value of $20,000.
12 of 34
5.2
13 of 34
5.2
Part (a) applies to a person who is highly risk averse: An increase in this individuals standard deviation of income requires a large increase in expected income if he or she is to remain equally well off. Part (b) applies to a person who is only slightly risk averse: An increase in the standard deviation of income requires only a small increase in expected income if he or she is to remain equally well off. 2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 7e.
14 of 34
5.2
In one study, 464 executives were asked to respond to a questionnaire describing risky situations that an individual might face as vice president of a hypothetical company.
The payoffs and probabilities were chosen so that each event had the same expected value. In increasing order of the risk involved, the four events were: 1. A lawsuit involving a patent violation 2. A customer threatening to buy from a competitor 3. A union dispute 4. A joint venture with a competitor
The study found that executives vary substantially in their preferences toward risk.
More importantly, executives typically made efforts to reduce or eliminate risk, usually by delaying decisions and collecting more information.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 7e.
15 of 34
5.3
REDUCING RISK
Diversification
diversification Practice of reducing risk by allocating resources to a variety of activities whose outcomes are not closely related. TABLE 5.5
Chapter 5 Uncertainty and Consumer Behavior
Hot Weather
Air conditioner sales Heater sales negatively correlated variables opposite directions. 30,000 12,000
Cold Weather
12,000
30,000
16 of 34
5.3
REDUCING RISK
Insurance
TABLE 5.6
Insurance Chapter 5 Uncertainty and Consumer Behavior No Yes
Actuarial Fairness
actuarially fair Characterizing a situation in which an insurance premium is equal to the expected payout.
17 of 34
5.3
REDUCING RISK
Suppose you are buying your first house. To close the sale, you will need a deed that gives you clear title. Without such a clear title, there is always a chance that the seller of the house is not its true owner. In situations such as this, it is clearly in the interest of the buyer to be sure that there is no risk of a lack of full ownership. The buyer does this by purchasing title insurance. Because the title insurance company is a specialist in such insurance and can collect the relevant information relatively easily, the cost of title insurance is often less than the expected value of the loss involved. In addition, because mortgage lenders are all concerned about such risks, they usually require new buyers to have title insurance before issuing a mortgage.
18 of 34
5.3
REDUCING RISK
TABLE 5.7
5000 1500
19 of 34
5.3
REDUCING RISK
Per-capita consumption of milk has declined over the yearsa situation that has stirred producers to look for new strategies to encourage milk consumption. One strategy would be to increase advertising expenditures and to continue advertising at a uniform rate throughout the year. A second strategy would be to invest in market research in order to obtain more information about the seasonal demand for milk. Research into milk demand shows that sales follow a seasonal pattern, with demand being greatest during the spring and lowest during the summer and early fall. In this case, the cost of obtaining seasonal information about milk demand is relatively low and the value of the information substantial. Applying these calculations to the New York metropolitan area, we discover that the value of informationthe value of the additional annual milk salesis about $4 million.
20 of 34
5.3
REDUCING RISK
Suppose you were seriously ill and required major surgery. Assuming you wanted to get the best care possible, how would you go about choosing a surgeon and a hospital to provide that care? A truly informed decision would probably require more detailed information. This kind of information is likely to be difficult or impossible for most patients to obtain. More information is often, but not always, better. Whether more information is better depends on which effect dominates the ability of patients to make more informed choices versus the incentive for doctors to avoid very sick patients. More information often improves welfare because it allows people to reduce risk and to take actions that might reduce the effect of bad outcomes. However, information can cause people to change their behavior in undesirable ways.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 7e.
21 of 34
*5.4
Assets
riskless (or risk-free) asset Asset that provides a flow of money or services that is known with certainty.
22 of 34
*5.4
Asset Returns
return Total monetary flow of an asset as a fraction of its price. Simple (or nominal) return on an asset, less the rate of real return inflation.
actual return
TABLE 5.8
Common stocks (S&P 500) Long-term corporate bonds U.S. Treasury bills
*Source: Stocks, Bonds, Bills, and Inflation: 2007 Yearbook, Morningstar, Inc.
23 of 34
*5.4
(5.2)
(5.3)
Price of risk Extra risk that an investor must incur to enjoy a higher expected return.
24 of 34
*5.4
An investor is dividing her funds between two assetsTreasury bills, which are risk free, and stocks. The budget line describes the trade-off between the expected return and its riskiness, as measured by the standard deviation of the return. The slope of the budget line is (Rm Rf )/m, which is the price of risk. Three indifference curves are drawn, each showing combinations of risk and return that leave an investor equally satisfied. The curves are upward-sloping because a riskaverse investor will require a higher expected return if she is to bear a greater amount of risk. The utility-maximizing investment portfolio is at the point where indifference curve U2 is tangent to the budget line. 2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 7e.
25 of 34
*5.4
Investor A is highly risk averse. Because his portfolio will consist mostly of the risk-free asset, his expected return RA will be only slightly greater than the risk-free return. His risk A, however, will be small. Investor B is less risk averse. She will invest a large fraction of her funds in stocks. Although the expected return on her portfolio RB will be larger, it will also be riskier.
26 of 34
*5.4
Because Investor A is risk averse, his portfolio contains a mixture of stocks and risk-free Treasury bills. Investor B, however, has a very low degree of risk aversion. Her indifference curve, UB, is tangent to the budget line at a point where the expected return and standard deviation for her portfolio exceed those for the stock market overall. This implies that she would like to invest more than 100 percent of her wealth in the stock market. She does so by buying stocks on margini.e., by borrowing from a brokerage firm to help finance her investment. 2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 7e.
27 of 34
*5.4
Why have more people started investing in the stock market? One reason is the advent of online trading, which has made investing much easier.
Figure 5.9 Dividend Yield and P/E Ratio for S&P 500
The dividend yield for the S&P 500 (the annual dividend divided by the stock price) has fallen dramatically, while the price/earnings ratio (the stock price divided by the annual earnings-per-share) rose from 1980 to 2002 and then dropped.
28 of 34
5.5
BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS
Recall that the basic theory of consumer demand is based on three assumptions: (1) consumers have clear preferences for some goods over others;
Chapter 5 Uncertainty and Consumer Behavior
(2) consumers face budget constraints; and (3) given their preferences, limited incomes, and the prices of different goods, consumers choose to buy combinations of goods that maximize their satisfaction or utility.
29 of 34
5.5
BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS
Some examples of consumer behavior that cannot be easily explained with the basic utility-maximizing assumptions:
Chapter 5 Uncertainty and Consumer Behavior
There has just been a big snowstorm, so you stop at the hardware store to buy a snow shovel. You had expected to pay $20 for the shovelthe price that the store normally charges. However, you find that the store has suddenly raised the price to $40. Although you would expect a price increase because of the storm, you feel that a doubling of the price is unfair and that the store is trying to take advantage of you. Out of spite, you do not buy the shovel. Tired of being snowed in at home you decide to take a vacation in the country. On the way, you stop at a highway restaurant for lunch. Even though you are unlikely to return to that restaurant, you believe that it is fair and appropriate to leave a 15-percent tip in appreciation of the good service that you received. You buy this textbook from an Internet bookseller because the price is lower than the price at your local bookstore. However, you ignore the shipping cost when comparing prices.
30 of 34
5.5
BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS
endowment effect Tendency of individuals to value an item more when they own it than when they do not. loss aversion Tendency for individuals to prefer avoiding losses over acquiring gains.
31 of 34
5.5
BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS
People are sometimes prone to a bias called the law of small numbers: They tend to overstate the probability that certain events will occur when faced with relatively little information from recent memory. Forming subjective probabilities is not always an easy task and people are generally prone to several biases in the process.
Summing Up
The basic theory that we learned up to now helps us to understand and evaluate the characteristics of consumer demand and to predict the impact on demand of changes in prices or incomes. The developing field of behavioral economics tries to explain and to elaborate on those situations that are not well explained by the basic consumer model.
32 of 34
5.5
BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS
Most cab drivers rent their taxicabs for a fixed daily fee from a company. As with many services, business is highly variable from day to day. How do cabdrivers respond to these variations, many of which are largely unpredictable? A recent study analyzed actual taxicab trip records obtained from the New York Taxi and Limousine Commission for the spring of 1994. The daily fee to rent a taxi was then $76, and gasoline cost about $15 per day. Surprisingly, the researchers found that most drivers drive more hours on slow days and fewer hours on busy days.
In other words, there is a negative relationship between the effective hourly wage and the number of hours worked each day.
33 of 34
5.5
BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS
A different study, also of New York City cabdrivers who rented their taxis, concluded that the traditional economic model does indeed offer important insights into drivers behavior.
The study concluded that daily income had only a small effect on a drivers decision as to when to quit for the day. Rather, the decision to stop appears to be based on the cumulative number of hours already worked that day and not on hitting a specific income target. What can account for these two seemingly contradictory results? The two studies used different techniques in analyzing and interpreting the taxicab trip records.
34 of 34