Guided by, Sri. K.C.GOPALAKRISHNAN ASST. PROFESSOR DEPT. OF MECHANICAL ENGG.

CET

Presented by, VARUN.P ROLL NO. 2010 M2,MACHINE DESIGN CET

OVER VIEW
Introduction Theoretical analysis Finite element analysis Results and discussion Conclusion References

INTRODUCTION ( K m da / dN = Claw ) The Paris

Need for compressive stress analysis Parameters used in the analysis
1. 2.

(1)

Maximum stress intensity Maximum compressive stress

THEORETICAL ANALYSIS
Nomenclature 1. da/dN - Fatigue crack propagation rate per stress cycle 2. da d- Fatigue crack growth rate with change of applied

stress f 3. i and Beginning and finishing stress levels respectively 4. maxten Maximum tensile stress level 5. max com Maximum compression stress level -

THEORETICAL ANALYSIS..
6. 8.

- Plastic zone size

r - Reverse plastic zone size

7. A - Initial stress-strain status

9. K max - Maximum stress intensity factor

10. max - Plastic zone size corresponds to maximum applied

tensile stress 11. B, , - constants ,

THEORETICAL ANALYSIS..
Development o fatigue crack propagation model for

tension-compression loading[1]

da dN =

( da
f i

d ) d = da
i

(2)

da dN = da

max ten

da + da +
max ten

max com

da + da

max com

(3)

 da

max ten

max com

da = da
da

max com

=0

(4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)

da / dN =

max ten

da = g ( ) d
g ( ) = A( )

A = B( r )

r = F ( K max, max com)

r = (0 ) ( K max 0 ys ) [0 ( max com ys ) ]
0

(10)

A = B( r ) B (0 ) ( K max 0 ys ) 0 ( max com ys )

]}

(11)

da / dN = B (0 ) (00 ys ) 0 ( K max ) / /

) 0 ( max com ys ) 0( + 0 ( max ) /

][

+0

(12)

max = (0 ) ( K max ys )

(13)

( ) da / dN = (000 B[0 + 0(0 ) + +00 ys ) 0 + +0 / ) /( )] / ( /

0 ( max com / ys ) ( K max )

0 + +0 ( )

(14)

da / dN = C 0 ( max com / ys )

] (K )

max

0 + +0 ( )

(15)

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

Specimen and dimensions Mechanical properties Stress criterion used Loading history
Modulus of elasticity = 70GPa Poissons ratio = =0.3 Yield stress = 353MPa Tensile strength = 462MPa

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The distribution of the normal stress of the 1mm crack[3]

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION..

The distribution of the normal stress at peak applied tensile stress[2]

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION..

The distribution of the normal stress at zero applied stress[2]

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION..

The distribution of the normal stress at maximum applied compressive stress[2]

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION..

The crack tip plastic zone

The crack tip plastic zone size at the peak applied tensile stress[2]

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION..

The change of reverse plastic zone with the increase of the applied compressive stress[2]

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION..

The calculated values of the applied compressive stress for all crack lengths[2]

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION..

The experimental results of fatigue crack propagation rate of aluminium alloy 2024-T351[4]

CONCLUSIONS
In a tension-compression load cycle, the compression part of the

load cycle has a significant effect on the near crack tip parameters. In a tension-compression load cycle, the two loading parameters dominating the near crack tip local parameters are maximum applied stress intensity factor and maximum applied compressive stress A fatigue crack propagation equation has been successfully used to explain the experimental observed fatigue crack growth behavior.

REFERENCES
1. J. Zhang , X.D. He, S.Y. Du. Analysis of the eects of

compressive stresses on fatigue crack propagation rate. International Journal of Fatigue 29 (2007) 17511756. 2. J. Zhang , X.D. He, B. Suo, S.Y. Du. Elasticplastic nite element analysis of the effect of compressive loading on crack tip parameters and its impact on fatigue crack propagation rate. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 75 (2008) 52175228. 3. J. Zhang, X.D. He, Y. Sha, S.Y. Du. The compressive stress effect on fatigue crack growth under tensioncompression loading. International Journal of Fatigue 32 (2010) 361367.

4. Yu MT, Topper TH, Au P. The effect of stress ratio,

compressive load and underload on the threshold behaviour of a 2024-T351 aluminium alloy. In:Beevers J, editor. Fatigue, vol. 84. MPCE; 1984. p. 17990.