Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Letian Dou, Jingbi You, Gang Li, Yang Yang Materials Science and Engineering, UCLA yangy@ucla.edu
YY LABs YY LABs 1 UCLA UCLA
Interpenetration Network Both Donor & Acceptor Domain size twice of exciton diffusion length (2 x LD) ~20 nm
YY LABs 2 UCLA
eOC H 2
S S S n/4 S
Absorption ( A) Exciton Diffusion ( ED) Charge Transfer ( CT) Charge Collection ( CC)
3
YY LABs
P3HT
UCLA
PCBM
YY
[1] G. Li, V. Shrotriya, J. Huang, Y. Yao, T. Moriarty, K. Emery, Y. Yang, Nat. Materials 2005, 4, 864 [2] J. Hou, H. Chen, S. Zhang, G. Li, Y. Yang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130 (48), 16144-16145 [3] L. Huo, J. Hou, S. Zhang, H. Chen, Y. Yang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 1500 1503 [4] J. Hou, H. Chen, S. Zhang, R. Chen, Y. Yang, Y. Wu, G. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 15586 15587 [5] H. Y.Chen, J. H. Hou, S. Q. Zhang, Y. Y. Liang, G. W. Yang, Y. Yang,L. P. Yu, Y. Wu, G. Li, Nat. Photonics 2009, 3, 649 [6] E. G. Wang, L. Wang, L. F. Lan, C. Luo, W. L. Zhuang, J. B.Peng, Y. Cao, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 033307 [7] Y. Zhang, S. K. Hau, H. Yip, Y. Sun, O. Acton, A. K.-Y. Jen, Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 2696 2698 [8] Y. Zou, A. Najari, P. Berrouard, S. Beaupre, B. R. Aich, Y. Tao, M. Leclerc, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5330 5331 LABs J. C. Bijleveld , V. S. Gevaerts , D. Nuzzo , M. Turbiez , S. Mathijssen , D. Leeuw , M. Wienk , R. Janssen, Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, E242 E246 [9] [10] S. H. Park, A. Roy, S. Beaupre, S. Cho, N. Coates, J. S. Moon, D. Moses, M. Leclerc, K. Lee, A. J. Heeger, Nat. Photonics 2009, 3, 297 [11] Y. Liang, Y. Wu, D. Feng, S. Tsai, H. Son, G. Li, L. Yu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 56 57 [12] Y. Liang, Z. Xu, J. Xia, S. Tsai, Y. Wu, G. Li, C. Ray, L. Yu, Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, E135 E138
UCLA
Chemical Structures
The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, and then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it again.
YY LABs 5 UCLA
Efficiency (%)
6.5
PBDTTT-C** PCPDTBT**
6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
PSBTBT** PSiFDBT*
4.3% P3HT*
Year
YY LABs
*uncertified,
6 UCLA
2011
2010
2009
2007
Inverted Structure
Applied Physics Letters (2006)
BCP
C60
C60
Crystal
Crys tal
PEDOT:PSS
ITO ITO
G las s
Glass
Certified world records for plastic solar cells Currently 26 employees www.solarmer.com
YY LABs 8 UCLA
Common Terms
Short Circuit Current V = 0, I = ISC Open Circuit Voltage I = 0, V = VOC Fill Factor I max Vmax FF = I sc Voc Power Conversion Efficiency:
YY LABs
UCLA
Limitations of Polymers
Narrow absorption range Low carrier mobility (~ 10-5 cm2/ V-s)
5x10
21
4x10
21
Absorbance
3x10
21
2x10
21
0.5
1x10
21
0 300
600
900
Wavelength (nm)
10 UCLA
Tandem Cell:
Stack two solar cells with complementary absorption range on top of each other. Enhances the net absorption range.
Solar Spectrum Green polymer absorption Red polymer absorption
5x10
21
1.0
ITO
YY LABs
4x10
21
Absorbance (a.u.)
3x10
21
0.5 2x10
21
PV1 n h
p+
PV2
1x10
21
0 300
600
900
0.0 1200
Wavelength (nm)
11 UCLA
Interconnecting layer
Electrically conductive
Anode
Front Cell
Rear Cell
Physically robust
Interconnecting layer
YY LABs 13 UCLA
Inverted structure:
+
YY LABs 14 UCLA
ITO ITO
PSBTBT:PC70BM
TiO2:Cs
P3HT:PC70BM
PEDOT:PSS PEDOT:PSS
TiO2 PEDOT:PSS Glass / ITO Substrate
+
0.60V
1.25V 0.66V
hR
PSBTBT
P3HT
YY LABs
UCLA
Tandem Device
ITO/PEDOT/P3HT:IC60BA/TiO2/m-PEDOT/PSBTBT:PC70BM/Ca/Al
4
-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
Bias (V)
FF (%) 65 54 63
PCE (%)
7.0
6.5
6.0
100
80
60
40
20
YY LABs
UCLA
FF (%) 60 62 63 64 67
Inter-connecting layer
100
Photoconductivity of TiO2
-1
Bias (V)
4
Large interface resistance observed when UV light is cut-off leading to S-shape in the J-V curves under light bias.
-4
YY LABs
-8
-0.4
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
Bias (V)
UCLA
18
TiO 2
PEDOT
Inverted Polymer Solar Cell and Inverted Polymer Tandem Solar Cell
YY LABs 20 UCLA
YY LABs
UCLA
2.9 Ca
Regular Structure
4.3 Al
Inverted Structure
1. G. Li, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 253503 (2006) 2. M. S. White , Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 143517 (2006) 3. C. Waldauf, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 233517 (2006) 4. R. Steim, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 093303 (2008)
No annealing o 70 C annealing o 120 C annealing o 150 C annealing o 170 C annealing o 210 C annealing
0.1
0.5
0.6
210
In 2008, we have demonstrated single layer tandem solar cell with 4.2% efficiency, which is comparable to our previously reported best regular P3HT:PCBM device structure 4.4%
H.H. Liao et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 173303 (2008)
Negligible optical loss due to absorption; Excellent electrical connection; Excellent Processibility The use of acidic PEDOT:PSS can be avoided
Device structure
- illustration & cross-section SEM
+ _
Devices
Voc (V)
Jsc (mA/cm2)
PCE (%)
FF (%)
Tandem
P3HT:PCBM ref PSBTBT:PCBM ref
1.20
0.58 0.64
7.84
8.6 11.7
5.1
3.2 3.7
54
64 49
Energy diagram
Optical loss of the ICL has been minimized. Ideal band structure for the ICL
Advanced Materials, 23, 1282 (2011)
(a) The structure of inverted tandem solar cell, and (b) band alignment of each layer
YY LABs
UCLA
PBDTT-DPP
UCLA
Properties of PBDTT-DPP
Absorption
YY LABs
Designed low bandgap polymer PBDTT-DPP (Eg=1.44 eV) has complementary absorption with wide bandgap polymer P3HT (Eg=1.9 eV).
UCLA
Properties of PBDTT-DPP
C-V
10 9
60
PBDTT-DPP LUMO = -3.63 eV HOMO = -5.30 eV
SCLC
8
J0.5 (mA0.5/cm)
7 6 5 4 3 2
Current/QA
30
-30
1
-1000 -500 0 500 1000 1500
-1500
0 0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
Voltage/mV
Bias (V)
YY LABs 31 UCLA
High performance of low bandgap polymer (PBDTT-DPP) based single junction solar cell
Low bandgap polymer (PBDTT-DPP, Eg=1. 44 eV) owns high mobility (3.110-4cm2V-1s-1 ), low HOMO energy (-5.3 eV), the PBDTT-DPP based single junction solar cells showed as high as 6.5% power conversion efficiency (PCE).
YY LABs
UCLA
High performance inverted tandem solar cell by using designed new LBG polymer PBDTT-DPP
VOC (V) Front cell (P3HT:ICBA) Rear cell (PBDTT-DPP:PC71BM) Tandem (NREL)
YY LABs
UCLA
Front cell
YY LABs
Rear cell
UCLA
YY LABs 35
UCLA
Jsc (mA/cm2) 8.26 7.2(front cell by EQE) 7.3(Rear cell by EQE) 9.93 8.83(front cell by EQE) 8.85(Rear cell by EQE)
FF (%) 66.8 70(Front cell) 63(Rear cell) 68.63 69(Front cell) 67(Rear cell)
10.22%
Summary
We have demonstrated high-performance tandem solar cell and investigated the ICL working mechanism. We demonstrated low bandgap polymer (PBDTTDPP) specifically designed for tandem solar cells. The significance of the PBDTT-DPP polymer is clearly demonstrated in the inverted tandem cell with 8.62% PCE measured by NREL. Finally, a new los bandgap polymer pushes our tandem solar cell to reach a record 10% PCE.
YY LABs 37 UCLA
UCLA
Rui Zhu, Ankit Kumar, and Yang Yang Materials Science and Engineering, UCLA California Nanosystem Institute (CNSI), UCLA
38
UCLA
39
UCLA
40
UCLA
Linear Polarizer
Polymer chain orientation
Polymer chain orientation Definition of polarization: using the oriented polymer chain axis as the reference parallel polarized light: optical polarization is parallel to polymer chain, absorbed perpendicular polarized light: optical polarization is perpendicular to polymer chain, transmitted Dichroic ratio DR = Absorption (Parallel) Absorption (Perpendicular)
41
UCLA
Functions: 1. Polarizer, the traditional polarizer function 2. PV device, harvesting ambient light, sunlight, or even the backlight energy.
42
UCLA
43
UCLA
UCLA
Devices:
Steps: 1. Align P3HT molecular chain, for anisotropic effect. 2. Form interpenetrated donar-acceptor networks, for efficient charge separation and transportation. 3. Electrode deposition.
45
UCLA
1. P3HT Alignment
//
R. Zhu , Y. Yang., et. al. Adv. Mater., 2011, 23, 4193 46 G. Derue, et. al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 8018
UCLA
S. H. Tolbert, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 20050 C. J. Hawker, et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 2011, 1, 82
47
UCLA
3. Electrode Deposition
Test condition AM1.5G, 1 Sun, unpolarized light s-mode polarized light, 0.33 Sun, p-mode polarized light, 0.33 Sun, //
Ratio(Jsc)=3.54
UCLA
Future Challenges
Highly transparent electrodes
Front electrode, back electrode
49
OLED Experience
In 1993, OLED have only a few hours of lifetime and efficiency is much less than 10 lm/watt. Currently, OLEDs have more than 50K hours of lifetime, and higher than 50 lm/watt efficiency. In May 2010, Samsung announced in SID that OLED will be the next trend of display technology.
YY LABs 51 UCLA
Acknowledgement
Dr. Dr. Mr. Mr. Youjun He (ORNL) Seiichiro Murase (Toray) Jun Yang, (Solarmer) Tom Moriarty, Dr. Keith Emery (NREL)
Funding:
YY LABs 53 UCLA