You are on page 1of 41

Tom Moglu, via Things Organized Neatly

Beyond the Seminar Paper:


Setting New Standards for New Forms of Student Work
4/28/12

4/28/12

4/28/12

Domenico Feti, Portrait of a Scholar, ca. 1620; Hollis Frampton, Editing, ca. 1975

4/28/12

44

4/28/12

4/28/12

4/28/12

4/28/12

4/28/12

4/28/12

Click to edit Master subtitle style

What Media Studies Makes


4/28/12 1111

The multimodal humanist brings together databases, scholarly tools, networked writing, and peer-to-peer commentary while also leveraging the potential of visual and aural (and interactive) media that so dominate contemporary life She aims to produce work that reconfigures the relationships among author, reader, and 4/28/12 1212 technology while investigating the

hands-on engagement with digital forms reorients the scholarly imagination, not because the tools are cool or new (even if they are) or because the audience for our work might be expanded (even if it is), but because scholars come to realize that they understand their arguments and their objects of study differently, even better, when they approach them through multiple modalities and emergent and interconnected forms of literacy. The ability to deploy new 4/28/12 1313

Practice / Production is research


if and only if it is (1) a systematic investigation, (2) conducted intentionally, (3) to acquire new knowledge, understanding, insights, etc., (4) justified, and (5) communicated, (6) about a subject research is purposive, inquisitive (seeking to acquire new knowledge), informed, methodical, and communicable
4/28/12
1414
(Stephen A. R. Scrivener, The Roles of Art and Design Process and Object In Research In

4/28/12

1515

4/28/12

Schedule

Lessons: The Myth of Immateriality + The Persistence of Materiality

Requireme nts
Exhibition Review Individual Exhibition Proposal Individual Research Dossier Final Exhibition

Guests: Whitney Adjunct Curator of New Media Christiane Paul + Exhibition Designer Tim Ventimigli a Lessons: Things/Objects/Material Culture + Methods for Investigating Materiality Lessons: Media Archaeology + The Gears in Your Hard Drive Plug-In Lessons Responding to Student Interest Field Trips: Thomas Edison National Historic Park + The Last Newspaper @ The New Museum Pecha Kucha of Conceptual Designs Tech Lab w/ Alison Cornyn of Picture Projects + Design Review String Mapping: Forming Exhibition Clusters + Links

4/28/12

4/28/12

4/28/12

4/28/12

4/28/12

Schedule

Tubes & Wires, Cables & Waves: Walking Tour of Cell Phone Infrastructure

Requireme nts
Process Blogs Map Critique + Prototype Individual Project Proposal Individual Research Dossier + Draft Map Final Map + Self-/ Group Assessment

Theoretical Framework: Media Archaeology Intellectual Tradition: Digital Humanities + Evaluation Rubrics Project Presentations + Research Strategies Mapping Theory + Critique Visit: Matt Knutzen, NYPL Geospatial Librarian Spatialized Data Modeling Pecha Kucha + Conceptual Design Feedback
(Critics: Interaction Designer, Graphic Designer, Urban Historian)

User Scenarios + Paper Prototyping Cartographic Arguments

4/28/12

Presentations + Peer Review

Evaluation Stage 1
4/28/12

4/28/12

2424

4/28/12

4/28/12

2626

4/28/12

2727

4/28/12

2828

4/28/12

Evaluation Stage 2

4/28/12

3030

4/28/12

4/28/12

4/28/12

Evaluation Stage 3

4/28/12

Research/ information organizatio n Writing/ essayistic Visualizatio n/ mapping

4/28/12

4/28/12

4/28/12

4/28/12

Evaluation Stage 4

Your intro text offers a really nice crystallization of your larger goals. It attempts to tell us what your map show and it articulately identifies the conceptual concerns that are at the core of your project, i.e., that radio takes places. There are some really intriguing issues you raise in this intro text that, obviously because of time and technical limitations, you werent able to fully develop (e.g., imagined maps). But if what you said in your last Process Blog is true that you want to continue your work on URT Id love to see some of these other dimensions of your project fleshed out! Your map does a great job of presenting the historical part of your argument. As I said in class yesterday, I think your tagging system is BRILLIANT. I regret that we werent able to develop URT to a point where it could support a timeline of some sort but you devised a fantastic work-around: date tags! This was a really creative, and effective, work4/28/12 around.

Evaluation Stage 5:

James Yang via The Chronicle: http://bit.ly/jkq0GW

4/28/12

Evaluation Stage 6:

4/28/12

You might also like