Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BRAINSTORMING (CLASSICAL)
Free-wheeling. Don't censor any ideas, keep the meeting flow going. Listen to other ideas, and try to piggy back on them to other ideas. Avoid any discussion of ideas or questions, as these stop the flow of ideas.
Have someone facilitating to enforce the rules and write down all the ideas as they occur (the scribe can be a second person) Generate ideas - either in an unstructured way (anyone can say an idea at any time) or structure (going round the table, allowing people to pass if they have no new ideas). Clarify and conclude the session. Ideas that are identical can be combined, all others should be kept. It is useful to get a consensus of which ideas should be looked at further or what the next action and timescale is.
Title of Slides
BRAINSTORMING (TRIGGER SESSIONS) Trigger Sessions are a good way of getting lots of ideas down from untrained resources. The Problem owner defines the problem Each member of group writes down his ideas in shorthand (2 minutes only) One member reads out his list - others silently cross out ideas read out and write down Hitch-hiked ideas The second member reads out his list of ideas not already covered, followed in turn by other members The last member reads out his original list and his Hitch-hiked list and procedure is repeated counter current (ie, if there are 6 folk, the order goes 1,2,3,4,5,6,5,4,3,2,1,2,3,4,5,6...) A good group will be able to manage severn passes. Everones paper is then collected and can be typed up into a single list of ideas - all duplicates should have been crossed out during the session.
Title of Slides
BRAIN SKETCHING
This technique is a Brain Writing technique. A group of 4-8 people sit around a table, or in a circle of chairs. They need to be far enough apart to have some privacy. The problem statement is agreed, and discussed until understood. Each participant privately draws one or more sketches (each on separate sheets of paper) of how it might be solved, passing each sketch on to the person on their right when it is finished. The facilitator suggests that sketches should not take more than 5 minutes or so to draw. Participants take the sketches passed on to them and either develop or annotate them, or use them to stimulate new sketches of their own, passing the amended original and/or any new sketches on to their neighbour when ready. After the process has been running for a suitable period and/or energy is running lower, the sketches are collected in. It will probably help to display all the sketches and to discuss them in turn for clarification and comment. Then move on to any appropriate categorisation, evaluation and selection process
Title of Slides
Title of Slides
Title of Slides
007 Acoustics Agriculture Archaeology Computers Crime Farming Finance Games Gardening Health Magic Medicine Models Money Noise Parenting Religion Romance Science Fiction
Astronomy Celebrations Chemistry Clothes Cosmetics Dinner Parties Dwellings Economics Electricity Folk Lore Kitchen implements Mathematics Minerals Music Nursing Physics Smells Space Travel Vacations Woodworking
Synectics
Process (Step 1) Problem owner provides headline and wish: They describes the issue, how it is experienced, the background, what has been tried, and the possible scope of action. It is then expressed in one or more big wish statements of the form: I wish (IW)... or How to (H2) ...
Module Code and Module Title Title of Slides
Synectics
Process (Step 2) Group generates large numbers of springboards. The mood here should be expansive and unconstrained. The springboards use the same formats as the big wish (IW, H2, etc.). They are not ideas for solutions, but articulate further wishes to open up space for invention: It would be nice if we could do X but we dont yet know how to.. A wide range of springboard triggering techniques could be used.
Module Code and Module Title Title of Slides
Synectics
Process (Step 3) Select an interesting springboard. The mood now switches to a more focused approach than in Steps 1-2. Problem owner and group members choose their favourite springboards (more on the basis of interest or appeal than on the basis of logical relevance). They share their choices, but final choice rests with the problem-owner. However, the process can always be repeated as it is iterative.
Module Code and Module Title Title of Slides
Synectics
Process (Step 4) Ideas to help achieve the selected springboard are generated using the trigger techniques mentioned in Step 2 (or any other idea-generation methods). The problem-owner selects some that seem interesting.
Title of Slides
Synectics
Process (Step 5) Check understanding of these by paraphrasing them and checking with their authors until the paraphrase is correct. An idea is selected for the Itemised Response listing. Process (Step 6) Itemised response Every conceivable positive features of the selected idea is listed. Then (and only then), a single concern / problem / issue is expressed as a problem for solution (e.g. How to ...). Solutions for these are expressed by all in terms of What you do is (WYDI)....
Module Code and Module Title Title of Slides
Synectics
Process (Step 5) Recycle or end Back to 4. until sufficient ideas for this spring board have been explored. Then back to 3. for another springboard. Cycle until the problem-solver has a solution s/he is happy to run with, or until time runs out.
Module Code and Module Title Title of Slides