Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Worldwide cross-border trade is estimated to increase from US$5.9 trillion in 1999 to US$8.4 trillion in 2005. 51 of the 100 largest economies in the world are corporations, not countries. Wal-mart is bigger than Indonesia, NTT is bigger than Ireland. Global brands now dominate most markets: Coca- cola, IBM, Toyota, etc.
These companies seek to extend its markets worldwide whilst seeking cost-reductions through scale economies by sourcing globally
Drivers of Globalisation
Global trade liberalisation; Trade barriers diminishing Multi-national companies evolving into real global organisations Production out-sourcing to lower cost regions Improved logistics infrastructure and operations 1
Political and Economical Forces Regional trade agreements Tariff & tax incentives overseas Local content requirements
Globalizatio n
Technological Forces Access to specific technologies Speed to market (integrate R&D and manufacturing)
Nike: re-created the sport shoe as high-tech, high-performance products that is an icon of youth subculture, with a price to match! Core business:
Air Max Penny basketball shoe: designed in Oregon and Tennessee, manufactured in South Korea and Indonesia from 52 components sourced from Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Indonesia and USA.
Nike markets over 300 new shoe design each year, leading to costly overstocks if sales forecasts not achieved. Distribution in USA is outsourced to third-party logistics providers with IT linkage to Nikes global sales and customer support systems, enabling sales/inventory information to be accesible to all decision makers concerned. When the supply chain is global and the products are fashion-oriented, the management of logistics becomes a key determinant of business success or failure.
More than just a company that exports source materials and components from more than one country geographically dispersed manufacturing/assembly locations market products worldwide
e.g. left-hand drive and right-hand drive cars e.g. voltage and socket variations by country production process complications co-ordination of production and transportation cross-docking, merge-in-transit economies of scale --> global cost competition 6
How can the needs of local markets be met while gaining economies of scale through standardisation?
Focussed Factories
Limit the range and mix of products manufactured at a single location to achieve economies of scale Instead of local-for-local production, each location produces a few items for the world market e.g. Heinz makes all the ketchup for Europe in only 3 plants and switches production depending on local costs, demand, and currency fluctuations Is using the global lowest-cost producer always the best strategy?
Especially on low-value, low-margin products More local safety-stock needed For high-tech products, usually < 10% is direct labour e.g. packaging styles, language labels
Customers order a variety of products from the same producer on a single order; but product now produced in focussed factories in diverse locations Product flexibility? Variety? Responsiveness?
9
Centralisation of Inventories
Pooling of inventories reduces cycle stock (EOQ square-root rule!) Pooling of inventories also reduces safety stock Philips reduced consumer electronics products warehouses in Europe from 22 to 4 Drawbacks:
Locating inventory near the customer, but managing and controlling it centrally
Virtual inventory reduces double-handling and physical transportation costs Requires an information system that can provide complete visibility of demand from one end of the supply chain to the other in as close to realtime as possible To be response, transport costs may also increase (e.g use of couriers for speedy delivery)
11
e.g. refrigerators, cars design products to use common platforms, components and modules delay final assembly/customisation as much as possible until final market destination and customer requirements known
12
Postponement:
maximise variety using fewest basic components final customisation out-sourced to local distribution centres 13
(Table abridged from e-Global Logistics by Robin Roberts, Stephens Inc., 2000.)
14
Issues
Physical location Foreign trading partners
Aware and business priority for global logistics
Global companies
Close-knit operations in multiple countries regardless of national borders
No foreign office
Suppliers: finite Customers: infinite Usually Low Usually High (not strategic) (competitive advantage) More Few
(logistics integrators) (several FFs, brokers, carriers)
Low
Low
Medium
High
15
Issues
SCM System sophistication
National Brick-&Mortar
Multinational companies
SCM system for planning and execution
Relatively predictable. (Many contractual trading partners).
Global companies
SCM system for planning and execution
Relatively predictable. (Many contractual trading partners; projected demand).
Not likely to have SCM system Supply predictable. Demand variable. Low Real-time. Small lot pick&-ship.
Small package
Demand/supply Predictable. (Few predictability contractual trade partners) Order Variability Low Batch processing (Bulk) Full container or LTL Mostly ocean
Mostly air
16
Issues
Import Quota requirements Local Taxation considerations Payment mechanisms Yes
National Brick-&Mortar
National e-commerce companies Not likely Relative simple (for small packages) Mostly credit cards
Multinational companies
Yes Relatively complex due to large shipment size
documents against acceptance,
Global companies
Yes Very complex, use of free trade zones and duty regulations Mostly wire transfers, ACH
Relatively complex due to large shipment size Credit cards, letter of credit (LC)
Mostly LCs,
Medium Trade complex documents requirement Major Challenge in International Logistics Lack of knowledge of international logistics; Customers do not know landed costs for sourcing comparisions
Relatively simple
Lack resource and expertise to handle international logistics; Customers do not know landed costs for sourcing comparisions
wire transfers Relatively complex, due to volume and payment methods Lack of easy interface with trading partners systems. Manual process for trade compliance and cost estimates slow.
Very complex, due to large shipments, countries involved and taxation issues Lack of seamless integration of business processes and info systems with trading partners. Manual process for trade compliance and cost estimates slow.
17
Extended lead times of supply Extended and unreliable transit times Multiple consolidation and break-bulk options Multiple freight mode and cost options International trade and finance issues
Duty, tariffs, taxes, customs Trade compliance: import ceilings and quotas, joint-venture requirements Cash flow, currency fluctuations, financial exposure concerns
Total landed costs can be much higher than traditional domestic logistics (transportation + warehousing) costs 18
sea freight from Rotterdam to Japan takes 5 weeks (a lot of inventory tied up at sea!) air-freight options may be attractive if total costs considered
International shipping, consolidation and customs delays are significant As variability increases, local managers tend to compensate by over-ordering, double-buffering and requesting more allocation
Instead, should explore transportation options and examine supply chain to reduce variability, increase shipment visibility and tracking
19
direct ship from each source to final market in full containers consolidate in the supply region for final market in full containers Consolidate from each source for each consumer region with break-bulk/intermediate inventory in region Consolidate in the supply region and also break-bulk in the consumer region
20
air freight transport cost expensive, but may be worthwhile when inventory holding costs, potential lost revenue and market flexibility taken into account
DHL, FedEx, UPS, TNT shorter and more reliable transit times swifter and less complicated procedures, e.g. customs clearance worldwide tracking and tracing capability co-ordinate export dept, shipping dept, freight forwarder
Compartmentalised decision-making (e.g. shipping dept, decisionexport dept) may focus on wrong or partial objectives and lead to sub-optimal decisions. sub21
Centralisation vs. Decentralisation? Efficiency vs. responsiveness? Global vs local decision making
Key principles: Strategic structure and control of logistics flows centralised for worldwide cost optimisation Customer service localised for competitive advantage Global co-ordination is key, especially if many functions out-sourced Global logistics information system is the pre-requisite for achieving local service needs and global cost optimisation 22
Location decisions
fundamentally affects the supply chain operations long-range impact; investments in fixed assets and equipment exchange rate and different regional costs must consider total cost (Activity-Based Costing) 23
Local markets have their own specific characteristics and needs opportunities for tailoring service against local customer requirements Monitoring of service needs and performance management of entire order-fulfillment process
24
Trend towards out-sourcing, not only for materials and components, but also for services Focus on core competencies Logistics: provision of warehousing, inventory control (VMI) and transportation is increasingly out-sourced Co-ordination and liaison with strategic partners is crucial
25
Only with updated and accessible information can the complex flows of goods be co-ordinated to achieve costeffective service Substitute Information for inventory Look down the pipeline into end-user markets to better see true demand
26
Customer service management Gathering market intelligence Warehouse management and local delivery Customer profitability analyses Liaison with local sales and marketing management Human resource management
27
Have had formal logistics organisations longer Tend to have logistics headed by an officer-level executive Adopt more fluid approach to logistics organisation; encourage frequent re-organisation to take advantage of opportunities Favour centralised control Becoming more centralised as they adapt organisational structure to corporate mission More apt to execute boundary-spanning or externally-oriented logistics functions Tend to manage more beyond or extended functional responsibilities not traditionally considered part of logistics
29
Have a greater tendency to manage logistics as a value-added process Reflect a stronger commitment to achieving and maintaining customer satisfaction Place a premium on flexibility, particularly in accommodating special or non-routine requests Are better positioned to handle unexpected events Are more willing to use outside service providers Place a premium on how well the service company performs in managing itself and its service to clients Are more apt to view service-provider relationships as strategic alliances Anticipate greater use of outside services in the future
30
Expend more effort on formal logistics planning Are more apt to publicise their performance commitments and standards by issuing specific mission statements Are more apt to have chief logistics officers involved in business unit strategic planning Respond effectively to non-planned events Regularly use a wider range of performance measures, including asset management, costs, customer service, productivity and quality Are more significant users of information processing technology and enjoy a higher quality of information systems (IS) support Typically have more state-of-the-art computer applications and are planning more updates and expansions Are more involved in new technology such as electronic data interchange (EDI), artificial intelligence (AI), etc.
31
Traditionally, organisations are hierarchical, vertical and functionally defined Current and future business environment:
focus on speed, just-in-time, short product life-cycles volatile demand flexibility in customer requirements
32
Conventional organisations
organised around functional silos inwardly focussed, concentrates on use of resources product development, order fulfilment, etc. through these processes are the customers satisfied capabilities reflect processes which require coordination and co-operation horizontally across t he organisation 34
Profit is the end, but the means important too What gets measured gets managed Performance drives profitability New performance indicators
customer satisfaction: customer retention, brand preference, dealer satisfaction, service performance flexibility: commonality of components, reduction of process complexity, set-up times people commitment: employer turnover, suggestions submitted and implemented, internal service climate and culture, training and development
35
Move away from focus on products e.g. brand managers, product group managers Re-focus on customer satisfaction and demand management Emphasis on customer value Need to be supported by accounting systems that better identify the cost of servicing the customers Logistics and marketing need to be managed conjointly
36
uncertainty is the mother of inventory forecasts are never right Feedback information on actual usage!
Substitute information for inventory capture information at point-of-sale early in the season flexibility in production process reduce reliance on (highly inaccurate) fashion forecasts 37
Benetton:
Tradition: focus on market share and winning customers Keeping customers important
the longer customers stay, the more profitable customers who drift from one supplier to another more difficult to satisfy than loyal and committed customers improved quality innovation sharing reduced costs integrated scheduling of production and deliveries barriers to entry of competitors
38
39
Leading to
Integral management of materials and goods flow
Skills required
Cross-functional management and planning skills Focus on markets and the Ability to define, measure creation of customer value and manage service requirements by market segments Focus on the key Understanding of the performance drivers of cost-to-serve and timeprofit based performance indicators Demand-based Information systems and replenishment and quick information technologies response systems Supply chain partnerships Relationship management and win-win orientation
40
Internet and other IT technologies can now link the customer directly to the supplier, and allow the supplier to react, sometimes in realtime. Geographically dispersed network of specialists can be joined together to create innovative and cost-effective solutions for complex designs e.g. Boeing, Airbus, Infosys Tescos sets up information exchange extranets to implement efficient consumer response (ECR) to reduce waste and improve product availability on average, 5 to 10 % of products on promotion suppliers can access Tesco sales data and track their products enables the firm to estimate stock levels to fulfil promotions specifications for new products can be available on-line
41
Boundary-less
horizontal process management across vendors, distributors, customers value-added exchange of information between partners
Supply chain becomes a synergistic confederation of organisations with agreed common goals, each bringing specific strengths to the overall value creation Example: Smart Car
42
Clear vision of the role of logistics in the organisation significant organisational change new ways of working with upstream and downstream partners in the supply chain underpinning information systems established Effective leadership crucial
43
Summary
Continuing trend towards globalisation global brands, global sourcing, focussed factories serving the world market Increased complexities: longer supply chains, more out-sourcing Need to balance the varying needs of local markets against the economic advantages of standardised procedures/products
Challenge: a flexible and agile supply chain yet achieves economies of scale/scope
Requires organisational change within firm and with supply change partners Integrated logistics planning; information technologies
44