Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JUSTICE IN
CANADA
Third Edition
COLIN GOFF
Slides by Gina Barber
An Overview of the
Criminal Justice
System in Canada
Copyright © 2004 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada
What is the Criminal
Justice System?
A network of
agencies
involved in the
– Investigation
– Detection
– Prosecution
– Correction
of offenders.
3
Purposes of Criminal
Justice
To control crime.
To prevent crime.
To maintain justice.
4
Assumptions of Justice
Guilt, innocence,
and punishment
should be based
on evidence.
Punishment must
fit the offence
and the offender.
Similar cases
should be treated
alike. 5
Disparity
Legitimate Disparity
– Based on seriousness of offence,
prior record.
Illegitimate disparity
– Based on extralegal factors such as
social class.
6
Discrimination
9
Structure of the
Criminal Justice
System
Police
Municipal Police
– About 67% of all
police.
– Includes regional
police.
Provincial Police
– Ontario, Quebec,
Newfoundland.
RCMP
– Federal statutes.
11
Courts
Lower Courts
– A.k.a. provincial courts.
– Deal with most cases.
Superior Courts
– Serious cases.
– Appeals.
Appeal Courts
– Cases from superior courts.
Supreme Court of Canada.
12
Corrections
Correctional Service of Canada
– Federal government
deals with sentences
of 2 years or more.
Provincial
corrections
– Less than 2 years.
Community
supervision
– Parole, probation,
statutory release,
temporary absences.
13
Formal Organization
of the Criminal
Justice System
Pretrial Criminal
Procedure
Arrest
– With or without a warrant.
Appearance notice
– By police on the spot.
Summons
– By justice of the peace.
Detention prior to trial
– Discretionary.
Bail
– May not be unreasonably denied.
15
Trial Procedure
First court appearance
– May include arraignment (charges read) or
postponement.
Preliminary inquiry
– Optional for indictable offenses to
determine if there is enough evidence to
proceed.
– Followed by indictment.
Trial
– Mostly by judge only.
– May elect jury trial in serious cases.
– Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
16
Sentencing
Many choices available.
– Discharge, probation, incarceration,
suspended sentence, fine.
Some sentences are automatic.
– Murder.
May use pre-sentence reports,
victim impact statements,
mitigating factors.
17
Incarceration
Provincial or federal institution
– Depending on length of sentence.
Treatment programs
– Vary with institutions.
Early release programs
– Parole or statutory release.
Community supervision
– Halfway houses.
18
Informal Operation of
the Criminal Justice
System
The Crime Funnel
Reported 100
Actual 96
Cleared 34
Number of cases
Charged 22
Convicted 15
Custody 4
% of total offenses
20
Source: Statistics Canada, 1997.
The Courtroom
Workgroup
Based on
cooperation.
Needs of members
take precedence.
Interpersonal
relations are
important.
Influenced by
agency and
professional needs.
21
Attrition of Cases
Many offences are not detected.
Victims may not report offences to
the police.
– Too minor, too much trouble, fear.
Some cases are not recorded as
crimes by police
– E.g. unfounded.
No suspect is identified
– Case is not cleared.
22
Attrition of Cases
Suspect may not be charged.
Charges may be withdrawn by victim
or prosecution.
Bail may be denied for extralegal
reasons.
Suspect may plead guilty following
plea bargaining by counsels.
Sentencing may be based on age,
sex, social status, race.
23
Values and the
Criminal Justice
System
Crime Control Model
Get tough approach.
Main goal is crime
reduction through
punishment.
Presumes guilt.
Assumes the system
doesn’t make
mistakes.
Supports the use of
discretion.
25
Due Process Model
Focuses on the
protection of legal
rights of accused.
Main goal is justice.
Limits powers of
officials.
Presumes
innocence.
Emphasizes
procedure.
26
Anti-Terrorism
Legislation
Introduced following September
11, 2001 attacks on New York and
Washington.
Bill C-36 (December 18, 2001)
– New definitions and tougher
sentences for terrorist activities.
– New police powers to investigate
suspected terrorist activities.
27
Anti-Terrorism
Legislation
Bill C-42
– New powers to federal government
ministers to deal with suspected
security threats.
– Replaced by Bill C-55.
Concerns about racial profiling
and civil liberties.
28