You are on page 1of 25

m m

   
 
   m
  m 
  Presented by
V.Prakash
 
 identify the current pr blems and difficulties
in aut m tive pr ect management and expl re
s luti ns t impr ve its efficiency and
effectiveness.
 meet the industry demands f r new pr ect
management meth ds
 m nit r and c ntr l c llab rative pr ects, t
measure their perf rmance, and t manage
risks.
 m mm

 key perf rmance indicat rs (KPIs)


 Balanced sc re card(BSC)
 c llab rative pr ect sc recard(CPS)
Findings
 An impact matrix t devel p strategy maps
 the p ssibilities f impr ving pr ect
management efficiency and effectiveness
 increasing pr ect transparency with a CPS.


R Cr ss-c mpany pr duct devel pment pr ects


are ften managed with ut clearly defined
pr ect g als and business alignment.
R With a shift t wards m re decentralized and
distributed devel pment teams, and an
increasing level f c llab rati n
R Pr ect transparency is reduced and status
measurement is m re difficult.
    m
 mm 
An interview with 20 pr ect managers fr m ten
different aut m tive c mpanies .
£ Pr ects with ut clearly defined g als
£ with l w-pr ect transparency
£ lack f c ntr l meth ds
£ predefined measures,
£ c mmunicati n deficiencies
£ insufficient risk management
m m 
     
     
  

R he sc recard must be built n c mmunicati n,


c mpliance, c ntinu us impr vement, and
c perati n

R A pr ect can be c nsidered as an rganizati n


with a visi n, and strategies t meet pr ect
bectives
   

hree elements
 Levels
 Cause and Effect relati nships
 Indicat rs
£ Pr ect g als and strategies can be derived
fr m the business BSC
£ Built ar und standard business bectives f r
success

m m  
 m   m 
   

R A meth d t map netw rked and c mplex


c herences, interdependencies, and dynamics
in pr ect management
R It was devel ped t identify active and passive
variables
R As well as their c ntr llability t identify and
evaluate cause-and-effect relati nships
m   m  
  
0 ->n impact
3 ->great impact
P -> pr duct
Q -> qu tient
D Active(AS) and Passive (PS)
D P = AS * PS

D Q =(AS/PS) * 100
 he interdependencies f the KPIs are identified
and evaluated, and can be represented in a
strategy map
 he devel pment f a pr ect strategy map (PSM)
is an essential part f the pr ect planning pr cess
 It sh uld be discussed with all pr ect members in
a PSC Kick-Off meeting t gether with the relevant
KPIs and drivers.
 After a carefully designed PSM, measures can be
defined based n cause-and-effect relati nships
f r efficient pr ect c ntr l.
   m 
 

R he idea f the new c ncept is t build a PSC


applied t c llab rative pr duct devel pment
pr ects
R he c ncept is currently in devel pment within
the sc pe f a c llab rative research pr ect f
the University f echn l gy in Sydney and the
BMW Gr up in Munich.
R he CPS has the same functi n as a PSC but
aims t increase pr ect transparency within
the pr ect members in netw rked structures
R he KPIs can be exchanged and synchr nized
t build a CPS
D with ut threatening each c mpany·s
D Predefined indicat rs
 m m  m  
m   m
  
 m      
  
 m m m m 


Combined CPS
partnership structure
    
m  m    m
   
   m 
m  
 m   m   

 m

R his pr ect analyses the current pr ect


management difficulties and pr blems in the
aut m tive industry and suggests p ssible
s luti ns t impr ve efficiency and
effectiveness.
R he pr p sed c ncept is applied t an
aut m tive pr ect and devel ped within the
sc pe f tw pr ect management w rksh ps.
hank y u

You might also like