Performance and Potential

Appraisal
What is performance
Def: It means outcomes achieved, or
accomplishments at work-the actual
contribution of an individual or team to
the organization's strategic goals
 Performance appraisal
means evaluating an
employee’s current
and/or past
performance relative to
his or her performance
standards
 Uses of Performance
Appraisals
• Performance Improvement. Performance feedback
allows the employee, the manager and human
resource specialists to intervene with appropriate
actions to improve performance.
 Uses of Performance
Appraisals
• Compensation Adjustments. Performance
evaluations help decision-makers determine who
should receive pay raises. Many firms grant part or
all of their pay increases and bonuses on the basis of
merit, which is determined mostly through
performance appraisals.
 Uses of Performance
Appraisals
• Placement decisions. Promotions, transfers and
demotions are usually based on past or anticipated
performance. Often promotions are a reward for
past performance.
• Training and development needs. Poor performance
may indicate untapped potential that should be
developed.
 Uses of Performance
Appraisals
• Career planning and development. Performance
feedback guides career decisions about specific
career paths one should investigate
• Deficiencies in staffing process. Good or bad
performance implies strengths or weaknesses in the
human resource department’s staffing procedures.
 Uses of Performance
Appraisals
• Informational inaccuracies. Poor performance may
indicate errors in job analysis information, human
resource plans, or other parts of the human resource
management information system. Reliance on
inaccurate information may have led to
inappropriate hiring, training, or counselling
decisions.
 Uses of Performance
Appraisals
• Job design error. Poor performance may be a
symptom of ill-conceived job designs. Appraisals
help diagnose these errors.
• Avoidance of discrimination. Accurate performance
appraisals that actually measure job-related
performance ensure that internal placement
decisions are not discriminatory.
 Uses of Performance
Appraisals
• External challenges. Sometimes
performance is influenced by factors
outside the work environment, such as
family, finances, health, or other
personal matters. If such influences
are uncovered through appraisals, the
human resource department may be
able to provide assistance.
PA involves answering following
questions
a. What performance was to be achieved
b. Has it been achieved
c. What were the shortfalls and constraints
d. What are we going to do now
e. How will we know that we have done it
f. What kind of feedback can be expected
g. What assistance is reqd. to improve
h. What rewards are likely to follow
Comparing Performance Appraisal and
Performance Management

 Performance appraisal
 Evaluating an employee’s current and/or past
performance relative to his or her performance
standards.
 Performance management
 The process employers use to make sure
employees are working toward organizational
goals.
PfM
According to Armstrong, PfM is a means
of getting better results from the
organization, teams and individuals by
understanding and managing
performance within an agreed
framework of planned goals, standards
and competence requirements.
 The Components of an Effective
Performance Management Process
 Direction sharing
 Role clarification
 Goal alignment
 Developmental goal setting
 Ongoing performance monitoring
 Ongoing feedback
 Coaching and support
 Performance assessment (appraisal)
 Rewards, recognition, and compensation
 Workflow and process control
The Appraisal Process
1. Establish performance standards
2. Communicate performance expectations
to employees
3. Measure actual performance
4. Compare actual performance with
standards
5. Discuss the appraisal with the employee
6. Initiate corrective action where
necessary
Traditional methods of PA
1. Straight ranking
2. Man-to-man comparison
3. Graphic rating scale
4. Forced distribution
5. Check lists
6. Free form essay
7. Critical incidents
8. Field review
Straight Ranking Method
 This is one of the oldest and simplest
techniques of performance appraisal.
 In this method, the appraiser ranks the
employees from the best to the poorest on
the basis of their overall performance.
 It is quite useful for a comparative
evaluation.
Man-to-man comparison

 A better technique of comparison than the

straight ranking method, this method
compares each employee with all others in
the group, one at a time.
 After all the comparisons on the basis of
the overall comparisons, the employees
are given the final rankings
Graphic rating scale
 In this method, an employee’s quality and quantity
of work is assessed in a graphic scale indicating
different degrees of a particular trait.
 The factors taken into consideration include both
the personal characteristics and characteristics
related to the on the job performance of the
employees.
 For example a trait like Job Knowledge may be
judged on the range of average, above average,
outstanding or unsatisfactory.
 Graphic
Rating
Scale with
Space for
Comments
Forced Distribution Method
 To eliminate the element of bias from the
rater’s ratings, the evaluator is asked to
distribute the employees in some fixed
categories of ratings like on a normal
distribution curve.
 The rater chooses the appropriate fit for
the categories on his own discretion.
Check lists Method

 The rater is given a checklist of the

descriptions of the behaviour of the
employees on job.
 The checklist contains a list of statements
on the basis of which the rater describes
the on the job performance of the
employees.
Free form essay Method
 This traditional form of appraisal, also known as
"Free Form method" involves a description of the
performance of an employee by his superior.
 The description is an evaluation of the
performance of any individual based on the facts
and often includes examples and evidences to
support the information.
 A major drawback of the method is the
inseparability of the bias of the evaluator.
Critical Incidents Method

 In this method of Performance appraisal, the evaluator

rates the employee on the basis of critical events and
how the employee behaved during those incidents.
 Keeping a record of uncommonly good or undesirable
examples of an employee’s work-related behavior and
reviewing it with the employee at predetermined times
 It includes both negative and positive points.
 Does not just reflect the employee’s most recent
performance
 The drawback of this method is that the supervisor has
to note down the critical incidents and the employee
behaviour as and when they occur.
Examples of Critical Incidents for
an Assistant Plant Manager
Field Review Method

 In this method, a senior member of the HR

department or a training officer discusses and
interviews the supervisors to evaluate and
rate their respective subordinates.
 A major drawback of this method is that it is a
very time consuming method.
 But this method helps to reduce the
superiors’ personal bias.
Modern methods of PA
1. Assessment centre
2. Human Asset Accounting Method
3. Management by objectives (MBO)
4. Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales
5. 360 degree Performance Appraisal
6. Balanced Scorecard
Assessment Centre Method
An assessment centre typically involves the use of methods
like social/informal events, tests and exercises, assignments
being given to a group of employees to assess their
competencies to take higher responsibilities in the future.

Generally, employees are given an assignment similar to the

job they would be expected to perform if promoted.

The trained evaluators observe and evaluate employees as

they perform the assigned jobs and are evaluated on job
related characteristics.

The major competencies that are judged in assessment

centres are interpersonal skills, intellectual capability,
planning and organizing capabilities, motivation, career
orientation etc.

Assessment centres are also an effective way to determine

the training and development needs of the targeted
employees.
Human asset accounting method
Human resources are valuable assets for every organization.

Human resource accounting method tries to find the relative worth of these
assets in the terms of money.

In this method the performance of the employees is judged in terms of cost

and contribution of the employees.

The cost of employees include all the expenses incurred on them like their
compensation, recruitment and selection costs, induction and training costs
etc whereas their contribution includes the total value added (in monetary
terms).

The difference between the cost and the contribution will be the
performance of the employees.

Ideally, the contribution of the employees should be greater than the cost
incurred on them.
Behaviorally anchored rating scale (BARS)
It is a technique which combines the graphic rating scale
and critical incidents method.

It consists of predetermined critical areas of job performance

or sets of behavioral statements describing important job
performance qualities as good or bad (for eg. the qualities like
inter personal relationships, adaptability and reliability, job
knowledge etc).

These statements are developed from critical incidents.

In this method, an employee’s actual job behaviour is judged

against the desired behaviour by recording and comparing the
behaviour with BARS.

Developing and practicing BARS requires expert knowledge.

 Example of a
Behaviorally
Anchored
Rating Scale for
the Dimension
Salesmanship
Skill
360 degree performance appraisal
It is also known as 'multi-rater feedback', is the most comprehensive
appraisal where the feedback about the employees’ performance comes
from all the sources that come in contact with the employee on his job.

360 degree appraisal has four integral components:

1. Self appraisal
2. Superior’s appraisal
3. Subordinate’s appraisal
4. Peer appraisal

It is also a powerful developmental tool because when conducted at regular

intervals it helps to keep a track of the changes in others’ perceptions about
the employees.

A 360 degree appraisal is generally found more suitable for the managers
as it helps to assess their leadership and managing styles. etc.
Management by objectives (MBO)
It was developed by Peter Drucker and refers to a comprehensive,
organizational wise goal setting and appraisal program

It can be defined as a process whereby the employees and the

superiors come together to identify common goals, the employees
set their goals to be achieved, the standards to be taken as the
criteria for measurement of their performance and contribution and
deciding the course of action to be followed.

The essence of MBO is participative goal setting, choosing course of

actions and decision making.

An important part of the MBO is the measurement and the

comparison of the employee’s actual performance with the
standards set. Ideally, when employees themselves have been
involved with the goal setting and the choosing the course of action
to be followed by them, they are more likely to fulfill their
responsibilities.
 Unclear
Halo Effect
Standards

Common
Appraisal
Problems
Central
Bias Tendency

Leniency or
Strictness
Potential Appraisal
1. To assess an individual in terms of the
highest level of work the individual will be
able to handle successfully in future
without being overstretched.
2. To assist the organisation in discharging
its responsibility of selecting and
developing managers for the future to
ensure its continuous growth.
Potential Attributes
1. Analytical power 9. Initiative
2. Creativity 10. Result orientation
3. Sense of reality 11. Team player
4. Effective leadership 12. Negotiation skills
5. Conceptual skills 13. Problem solving
6. Technical skills 14. Decision making
7. Communication 15. Subordinate
skills development
8. Planning ability