Annamalai University, Annamalainagar – 608002, India • The objective of this paper is to perform the analysis of space frame-raft-soil system under static load to understand the influence of raft thickness on behaviour of Varying Foundation Layer Thickness l-raft and frame.
• In the analysis all the three components, viz,
space frame, raft and Varying Foundation Layer Thickness were considered as a single compatible unit. • Raft is a foundation, which is generally used to support heavily loaded structure as well as the structure founded on heterogeneous deposits.
• The analysis of raft foundation has been
undergone various developments and currently it is being analyzed with so much sophistication by incorporating interaction between structure, raft and soil inclusive of time dependent non-linear behavior • The analysis was carried out on a space frame (3 bay x 5 bay)-raft-soil system of five-storey height. The plan of quarter raft and positions of columns are shown in figure 1.
• The column spacing is 5m. It is assumed that
the raft is placed directly on the sand medium. In general sand is treated as non- homogeneous material, wherein modulus of sand varies with depth. Fig1 Plan of Quarter Raft and Position of Columns • FINITE ELEMENT MODEL • An ANSYS finite element code is used here. The finite element discretization along a vertical section of space frame of 3 bay x 5 bay adopted in this study is shown in figure 2. • A two noded beam element (BEAM 4) with six degrees of freedom per node is adopted for the beams and columns of the superstructure. Connection between them is treated as rigid. • Soil medium below the raft has been modeled using eight-node brick element (SOLID 45) having three degrees of freedom of translations in the respective co-ordinate directions at each node. Fig. 2 Element Discretization of Frame – Raft - Soil • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
• A rectangular raft of 25 m x 15 m supporting
24 columns spaced at 5m centre to centre on both directions is analysed. The results of the analysis are presented and discussed below. • Effect of raft thickness on behaviour of soil-raft and frame Settlement of raft • The settlement (W) and span (X) of the raft are normalized by spacing between column, (I) and are presented in non-dimensional form as W/I and X/I in figure 4.
• The variation of normalized settlement was presented
in figure 4 along the section b1-b4 of the raft on a linear soil. • In general, settlement at the centre of the raft is higher than at edge irrespective of column spacing. • The increase in raft thickness resulted in lesser settlement of raft as expected. Fig. 4 Variation of Settlement along B1-B4 for Different Thickness of Raft • Contact pressure below the raft.
• The contact pressure distribution below raft is depicted
in figure 6 for section of b1-b4 of 5m column spacing.
• It is observed that contact pressures at the edges are
higher than at the centre. Further contact pressure variation in the raft was studied by increasing the thickness of raft.
• For a given stiffness of superstructure and soil
conditions, higher the `t’ lesser the contact pressure. Fig.5 Variation of Contact Pressure along B1-B4 for Different Thickness of Raft • CONCLUSIONS • Space frame with a raft resting on a varying foundation layer thickness was analyzed by varying the raft thickness.
• The following important conclusions are
drawn. Increase in raft thickness resulted in lesser settlement of raft Higher the thickness of raft `t’ lesser the contact pressure