Professional Documents
Culture Documents
22-1
Measuring Portfolio Performance
“Bottom line” issue in investing
Important for investors who manage their
own money or have others manage it
Performance must be evaluated before
intelligent decisions can be made about
portfolios
Ratings reflect only past performance, not
future performance
22-2
Three key questions
1. Was the return, after expenses,
satisfactory?
22-3
Change in investor’s total wealth over an
evaluation period
(VE - VB) / VB
VE =ending portfolio value
VB =beginning portfolio value
Assumes no funds added or withdrawn
during evaluation period
◦ Timing of cash flows is important
22-4
Money-weighted returns
◦ Equivalent to internal rate of return (IRR)
◦ Measures actual return considering
contributions and withdrawals
◦ Equates initial value with PV of cash flows and
ending value
◦ Cash flow effects make comparisons to
indexes or other portfolios inappropriate
22-5
Time-weighted returns
◦ Unaffected by portfolio additions/withdrawals
◦ Measures actual rate of return earned by
manager
Money-weighted vs. Time-weighted returns
◦ Can produce different results
◦ MWR captures rate of return to owner
◦ TWR captures rate of return earned by
portfolio manager
22-6
Risk differences cause portfolios to respond
differently to market changes
Total risk measured by the standard
deviation of portfolio returns
Nondiversifiable risk measured by a
security’s beta
Coefficient of determination (R2) denotes
degree of diversification
22-7
Performance Benchmarks & Universes
Good universes/benchmarks are:
◦ Unambiguous
◦ Specified in advance
◦ Appropriate
◦ Investable
◦ Measurable
It can be difficult to find benchmarks that
meet these criteria
22-8
Performance Benchmarks & Universes
Universes
◦ Constructed by aggregating market valuations and
income accruals for a large number of portfolios
◦ Generally not investable or specified in advance
◦ Subject to survivorship bias
Benchmarks
◦ Unmanaged portfolios that reflect investment style
◦ Unambiguous, measurable, investable
◦ May not truly capture manager’s style
22-9
Performance Evaluation
Straightforward method
◦ Compare each asset class to relevant
benchmark
◦ Calculate weighted average return
◦ Compare return to your portfolio
◦ Money-weighted return will measure
portfolio’s return to owner
22-10
Sharpe (reward-to-variability) ratio
22-11
The estimated a coefficient in
Rpt - RFt =ap +bp [RMt - RFt] +ept
is a means to identify superior or inferior portfolio
performance
◦ CAPM implies a is zero
◦ Measures contribution of portfolio manager
22-12
M2
Allows returns between portfolios to be
compared
Measured in percentage terms, easy to
understand
Equates the volatility of portfolio to market
◦ The resulting measure, M2, is directly
comparable to market return
22-13
Performance Measures Compared
22-14
Information Ratio (IR): relates performance
to a designated benchmark
Where,
◦ Mean active return often referenced as “alpha”
◦ Standard deviation of active return often
referenced as “tracking risk”
Sortino ratio (SR) focuses on “excess”
return relative to downside risk
22-17
Components: Measurement, Attribution, and
Appraisal
Measurement – measure the performance
(risk and return) of the portfolio
Attribution – attribute performance to
manager’s selection or allocation abilities
Appraisal – assess the manager’s
performance
Performance Attribution
22-19
Performance Presentation
Minimum standards developed to reduce
performance misrepresentations
◦ Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS)
require:
Uniformity in calculations and disclosures
Inclusion of all fee-paying discretionary portfolios
in composites with similar objectives
Compliance history for at least five years
Effective evaluation requires long-term results,
fair measures
22-20
Copyright 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
22-21