Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Corporate social and environmental awareness has become essential for companies as they
realise that they must listen to all stakeholders if they are to achieve their objectives. Judging
from his public statements, Bill Ford Jr, former chairman of Ford, has changed his greater and
father’s most quoted statement to reflect a different hue. It might now read: ‘Any colour as
long as it’s green.’ Speaking at a Greenpeace conference in London, the head of the world’s
third-largest car manufacturer said that he would like to see the end of the internal
combustion engine and also predicted the decline of car ownership. However, he combined
this environmental commitment with an equally strong desire to ensure Ford’s continued
profitability. Such a combination of environmental responsibility, ethics and profits is one that
is attracting increasing attention. The Business Leaders Forum’s Human Capitalism campaign
disagrees with the idea that the interests of shareholders and those of other stakeholders (i.e.
employees, community, customers) must always conflict. The campaign seeks to
weld these two seemingly opposite forces so that doing good and doing good business
become one and the same thing. Members of the campaign include Andersen Consulting,
Coca-Cola, Diageo, The Financial Times, Time Magazine and the WPP Group.
Case study
Corporate social responsibility
Social and environmental responsibility has moved from a ‘nice to do’ to a ‘need to do’. One of the main
findings of a recent report by the International Business Leaders Forum is a focus on employees and their views
of the companies they work for or may wish to work for. When asked to rank their principal reasons for
admiring certain companies, nearly a quarter (24%) of all respondents said respect for employees. That
compared to 21% who rated environmental responsibility, 12% financial stability and 4% who thought creativity
the most important aspect of an admirable company. The importance of the employee has been highlighted by
the so-called ‘war for talent’. Recruiting the brightest and best has become a key concern of corporate strategy.
Says Tom Cooper, of PricewaterhouseCoopers: ‘There is such a limited number of the right type of graduates
right now, and they are choosy about the type of company they will work for. The cost of recruiting and
retaining staff is likely to be higher if you are deemed not to be an ethical employer and organisation.’ A
company’s reputation also has significant implications for its financial performance. Some analysts believe it is
one of the key factors in valuation of companies. One company could have a higher stock market valuation
than another one solely due to its good social and environmental reputation. Shell, a company with
traditionally one of the worst
reputations among environmental and social pressure groups, has made enormous eff orts to reinvent itself
from being the environmentalists’ favourite whipping boy to pioneer a socially responsible business. It has
stated its aims as nothing less than to become ‘the leading multinational in economic, environmental and
social responsibility’. Shell’s chairman has said that the reason for Shell’s conversion to sustainability is
commercial: ‘We won’t achieve our business goals unless we are listening to – and learning from – the full
range of our stakeholders in society
Case study
Corporate social responsibility