This document discusses nitrogen footprints, which measure the negative environmental impacts of reactive nitrogen losses. It provides background on other footprint metrics like carbon and water footprints. Nitrogen footprints can be calculated at various scales, from process to economic levels. Specifically, gross and net nitrogen balances are used to estimate nitrogen inputs/outputs from soil. The document also describes how life cycle assessment can be used to calculate and compare nitrogen footprints of different products.
This document discusses nitrogen footprints, which measure the negative environmental impacts of reactive nitrogen losses. It provides background on other footprint metrics like carbon and water footprints. Nitrogen footprints can be calculated at various scales, from process to economic levels. Specifically, gross and net nitrogen balances are used to estimate nitrogen inputs/outputs from soil. The document also describes how life cycle assessment can be used to calculate and compare nitrogen footprints of different products.
This document discusses nitrogen footprints, which measure the negative environmental impacts of reactive nitrogen losses. It provides background on other footprint metrics like carbon and water footprints. Nitrogen footprints can be calculated at various scales, from process to economic levels. Specifically, gross and net nitrogen balances are used to estimate nitrogen inputs/outputs from soil. The document also describes how life cycle assessment can be used to calculate and compare nitrogen footprints of different products.
MOTIVATION Nitrogen is the first element of group 15 in the periodic table and is classified as a nonmetal. The stable state of nitrogen is in the form of diatomic gas N2 Nitrogen can exist in multiple oxidation states ranging from -3 in ammonia (NH3) to +5 in nitrate (NO-3) Approximately 78.09% by volume of air is N2 Nitrogen is also an essential nutrient for the growth of plants that necessitates use of fertilizers MOTIVATION Nitrogen has also been associated with many negative environmental impacts. The quality of water, destroyed fisheries, and damaged the ocean ecosystem has been caused by excessive nitrogen. Among other environmental impacts of nitrogen is the contribution of N2O (nitrous oxide) to the global warming potential. N2O is a 300 times more potent greenhouse gas than CO2. BACKGROUND ON FOOTPRINTS Footprints have become standard measures for sustainability assessment. Ecological footprint is the measure of human impact on the limited land resource. In this approach, human consumption is converted into equivalent land area that is required to provide these resources along with area required to absorb the CO2 emissions incurred because of consumption activities. The original concept of ecological footprint led to the development of carbon footprint, water footprint, one of the most recent entrants to the footprint family is the nitrogen footprint. BACKGROUND ON FOOTPRINTS Carbon footprint is calculated as the total amount of GHG (Green house gas) emissions in terms of an equivalent amount of CO2. The concept of carbon footprint is based on the global warming potential of GHG emissions. Carbon footprint define as “total amount of direct and indirect CO2 emissions for a process, product or system.” This definition limits the carbon footprint to CO2 emissions only, whereas other definitions include other greenhouse gases like methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O). Most of the footprint measures originate with a particular concern such as the roots of “carbon footprint” and global warming. The water footprint is based on the concern of scarcity of water for human consumption. The water footprint concept captures the total amount of water required to support human consumption. This metric captures the sustainability of human consumption based on availability of water resource. The water footprint calculation is more involved because it classifies water into three different categories, blue, green, and gray water footprint. The first two categories (blue and green water footprints) are based on the source or origin of water being consumed. the last (gray water footprint) is based on the pollution generated in the process. The blue water footprint is defined as the consumption of water originating in blue water resources such as surface- and groundwater. The green water footprint is defined as the consumption of water that originates in sources such as rainwater stored in soil as soil moisture. The gray water footprint is the volume of water that will be needed to dilute the pollution of water bodies so that the water bodies meet the water quality standards. The total water footprint is calculated as the sum of blue, green, and gray water footprints. Calculations, data requirements, and applications in detail as state-of-the-art for water footprint calculations. Other considerations in calculations of water footprints are the scale of study, as in the case of carbon footprint calculations. Water footprint can also be calculated as process, product, consumer, and geographical The most recent entrant in the family of footprints is the nitrogen footprint. in the case of nitrogen footprint it is the negative impact association with reactive nitrogen losses to the environment that is the motivation. This negative impact has led to several previous efforts to develop farm scale and regional and national nitrogen balances. It captures the total amount of nitrogen losses attributable to human consumption of various goods and services. SCALE OF FOOTPRINTS The scale of footprints is dependent on the scope of the study conducted. The decision can range from comparing two products, processes, economies, or regions (nation). The common use of footprints is to compare the environmental impacts of products, which is mostly performed on the process scale or economy scale. PROCESS SCALE The most common use of footprints is to compare two processes or two products. all the inputs and outputs of a corn farming process can be recorded and specific flows associated with a chosen footprint can be added together for the process scale footprint reporting. LIFE CYCLE FOOTPRINTS Life cycle analysis (LCA) is a method that extends the boundary of study beyond the immediate processes associated with the products. The calculation method for the life cycle footprint is similar to the process scale footprint. ECONOMIC INPUT-OUTPUT FOOTPRINT The economic input-output (EIO) footprint calculation is based on the EIO model, which is an analytical framework to capture the interconnections among the processes in the economy. HYBRID SCALE FOOTPRINT The hybrid scale footprint originates from the boundary selection as in the case of hybrid LCA. Hybrid LCA was developed to combine the advantages of process-based LCA and EIO- LCA. EIO-LCA has the disadvantage of using average values for impact attributable to aggregation of sectors. This leads to the difficulty of not being able to compare two products on a fine scale because the products belong to the same sector of the economy NITROGEN ACCOUNTING AND FOOTPRINT The approach is a process scale mass balance technique called “gross and net nitrogen balances.” The “gross nitrogen balance” estimates the total nitrogen input to soil and total nitrogen output from soil. The gross balances include all emissions to soil, air, and water. This involves exclusion of N volatilization and denitrification from manure and fertilizer to calculate net nitrogen balances. These nitrogen balances can be used as an indicator for potential of environmental impacts associated with nitrogen use. ECO-LCA NITROGEN FOOTPRINT FOR PRODUCTS The components of the Eco-LCA nitrogen inventory can also be used to estimate the nitrogen footprint for various products. The following steps describe the process of calculating the nitrogen footprint using Eco- LCA inventory: Identify the system boundary for impact calculation of the product Collect Eco-LCA nitrogen inventory component data Obtain the monetary final demand on the economic sector scale. Combine the process scale and economy scale data CASE STUDY: COMPARISON OF ECO-LCA NITROGEN FOOTPRINT FOR FUELS