You are on page 1of 18

PRESENTASI

SOAL dan
JAWABAN
STATISTIKA-WEEK 4
Question 1
Mike Wilde is president of the teachers’ union for Otsego School
District. In preparing for upcoming negotiations, he would like to
investigate the salary structure of classroom teachers in the district.
He believes there are three factors that affect a teacher’s salary: years
of experience, a rating of teaching effectiveness given by the
principal, and whether the teacher has a master’s degree. A random
sample of 20 teachers resulted in the following data.
TABLE DATA

*1 = yes, 0 = no.
Develop a correlation matrix. Which independent variable
has the strongest correlation with the dependent variable?
Does it appear there will be any problems with
multicollinearity?

Years of Principal’s
Salary Master's Degree
Experience, X1 Rating, X2
Salary 1
Years of
0,577299 1
Experience, X1
Principal’s
0,442869 -0,32744 1
Rating, X2
Master's Degree -0,37181 -0,80861 0,373321 1

Strongest Correlation: Problem with multicollineary:


=> Salary with Years of Yes. Because there is -0.80861
Experience (more than -0.7)
Determine the regression equation. What salary would
you estimate for a teacher with five years experience, a
rating by the principal of 60, and no masters degree?-
continued
Determine the regression equation. What salary would
you estimate for a teacher with five years experience, a
rating by the principal of 60, and no masters degree?-
last-

▸ Regression Equation:

The estimated salary for a teacher with five years


experience, a rating by the principal of 60, and no master
degree is 36,6658 (in thousand US$)
Conduct a global test hypothesis to determine whether
any of the regression coefficients differ from zero. Use
the .05 significance level.

Bring the attention


of your audience over
a key concept using
icons or illustrations
Conduct a test of hypothesis for the individual regression
coefficients. Would you consider deleting any of the
independent variables? Use the .05 significance level.

▸Using the regression table, the t ratio of years experience is 1,5131 and the p
values of Years experience is 0.2694. Because the p value is more than 0.05, we
conclude that the years expereince regression coefficient could equal 0. Thus,
years of experience should not be included in the equation to predict a teacher’s
salary.
▸The t ratio of principal’s rating is 1,9658 and the p value is 0,1882. The p value
is more than 0.05 the principal rating could equal 0. So, principal’s rating should
not be included in the equation topredict teachers salary.
▸The t ratio of master degree is 0,0952 and the p value is 0,9328. The p value is
more than 0.05 the principal rating could equal 0. So, principal’s rating should not
be included in the equation topredict teachers salary.
If your conclusion in part (d) was to delete one or
more independent variables, run
the analysis again without those variables.

▸Without Master degree


E. SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0,883472994
R Square 0,78052453
Adjusted R
Square 0,634207551
Standard Error 2,939992117
Observations 6

ANOVA
Significance
df SS MS F F
Regression 2 92,21767238 46,10883619 5,334477 0,102820327
Residual 3 25,93066095 8,643553651
Total 5 118,1483333

Lower
Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% 95,0% Upper 95,0%

Intercept 15,00446535 6,017721046 2,493380007 0,08822 -4,146608764 34,1555395 -4,14660876 34,15553945

X Variable 1 1,449013691 0,512687599 2,826309227 0,066392 -0,182587063 3,08061445 -0,18258706 3,080614445

X Variable 2 0,198984871 0,080477956 2,472538834 0,089862 -0,057131902 0,45510165 -0,0571319 0,455101645


F. 90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Gaji (ribu $)
pengalaman mengajar (tahun),
penilaian kepala sekolah,
45
G.
40

35

30
Residu

25

20

15

10

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

Ŷ
Question 2 - 44
▸A sample of 12 homes sold last week in St. Paul, Minnesota, is
selected. Can we conclude that, as the size of the home (reported
below in thousands of square feet) increases, the selling price
(reported in $ thousands) also increases?
a. Compute the correlation coefficient.
Home Size Selling Price

Mean 1,15 Mean 96,66666667

Standard Error 0,054355731 Standard Error 4,536607552

Median 1,15 Median 102,5

Mode 1,1 Mode 105

Standard Deviation 0,188293774 Standard Deviation 15,71526955

Sample Variance 0,035454545 Sample Variance 246,969697

Kurtosis -0,488888889 Kurtosis -0,943584629

Skewness -0,39218585 Skewness -0,453624695

Range 0,6 Range 50

Minimum 0,8 Minimum 70

Maximum 1,4 Maximum 120

Sum 13,8 Sum 1160

Count 12 Count 12
a. Compute the correlation coefficient.
Home Size Selling Price X - X Y - Y (X - X)(y - y)
1,4 100 0,25 3,333333333 0,833333333
1,3 110 0,15 13,33333333 2
1,2 105 0,05 8,333333333 0,416666667
1,1 120 -0,05 23,33333333 -1,166666667
1,4 80 0,25 -16,66666667 -4,166666667
1 105 -0,15 8,333333333 -1,25
1,3 110 0,15 13,33333333 2
0,8 85 -0,35 -11,66666667 4,083333333
1,2 105 0,05 8,333333333 0,416666667
0,9 75 -0,25 -21,66666667 5,416666667
1,1 70 -0,05 -26,66666667 1,333333333
1,1 95 -0,05 -1,666666667 0,083333333
10
a. Compute the correlation coefficient.
Correlation Coefficient :

X-X
b. Determine the coefficient of determination.

▸The relationship is positive or direct, because the sign of the


correlation coefficient is positive. As the size of the home
(reported in thousands of square feet) increases, the selling
price (reported in $ thousands) also increases increases.
▸The relationship between the two variables is weak positive
correlation. If the values of the correlation coefficient is close to
one, its indicate stronger relationships.
▸In this case, r = 0.375. It is closer to zero, and we would
observe that the relationship is not very strong.
c. Can we conclude that there is a positive association
between the size of the home and the selling price? Use
the .05 significance level.

H0 is rejected. There is a positive association


between home size and selling price.

You might also like