Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gemma G. Benelada
“It is a capital mistake to theorize before
one has data.”
~Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
Leadership is contingent upon the interplay of all
three aspects of the leader-follower-situation
model.
The four theories reviewed in this chapter share
several similarities:
◦ They are theories rather than someone’s personal
opinions.
◦ They implicitly assume that leaders are able to
accurately diagnose or assess key aspects of the
followers and the leadership situation.
◦ With the exception of the contingency model, leaders are
assumed to be able to act in a flexible manner.
◦ A correct match between situational and follower
characteristics and leaders’ behavior is assumed to have
a positive effect on group or organizational outcomes.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 12-4 © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Some leaders may be generally more supportive
and relationship-oriented, whereas others may
be more concerned with task or goal
accomplishment.
The contingency model suggests that leader
effectiveness is primarily determined by selecting
the right kind of leader for a certain situation or
changing the situation to fit the particular
leader’s style.
To understand the contingency theory one must
look first at the critical characteristics of the
leader and then at the critical aspects of the
situation.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 12-5 © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Situational favorability is the amount of
control the leader has over the followers.
The more control a leader has over followers,
the more favorable the situation is, at least
from a leader’s perspective.
Three sub-elements in situation favorability:
◦ Leader-member relations
◦ Task structure
◦ Position power
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 12-6 © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
The underlying mechanism of the path-goal
theory deals with expectancy, a cognitive
approach to understanding motivation where
people calculate:
◦ Effort-to-performance probabilities
◦ Performance-to-outcome probabilities
◦ Assigned valences or values to outcome
Path-goal theory uses the same basic
assumptions as expectancy theory.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 12-7 © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Path-goal theory contains two groups of follower
variables:
◦ Satisfaction of followers
◦ Followers perception of their own abilities
Followers will actively support a leader as long as
they view the leader’s actions as a means for
increasing their own level of satisfaction.
Followers who believe they are perfectly capable
of performing a task are not as apt to be
motivated by, or as willing to accept, a directive
leader as they would a leader who exhibits
participative behavior.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 12-8 © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Directive leadership
Supportive leadership
Participative leadership
Achievement-oriented leadership
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 12-9 © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Path-goal theory considers three situational
factors that impact or moderate the effects of
leader behavior on follower attitudes and
behaviors:
◦ Task
◦ The formal authority system
◦ The primary work group
These variables can often affect the impact of
various leader behaviors.
Path-goal theory maintains that follower and
situational variables can impact each other.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 12-10 © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.