Professional Documents
Culture Documents
William P. Robbins
Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering
University of Minnesota
May, 2002
Magnetic Component Design Problem
• Challenge - conversion of component operating specs • Design procedure outputs.
in converter circuit into magnetic component design • Core geometry and material.
parameters. • Core size (Acore , Aw)
• Number of turns in windings.
• Conductor type and area Acu.
• Goal - simple, easy-to-use procedure that produces • Air gap size (if needed).
component design specs that result in an acceptable • Ability to compare the performance of different
design having a minimum size, weight, and cost.
cores and core materials for the same component.
Determine core size using • Use 2 Vpri Ipri = 4.4 f kcu Jrms Bac Aw Acore to find the required
assumed values of J and B area product Aw Acore and thus the core size.
• Assume Jrms= 2-4 A/mm2 and Bac = 50-100 mT.
Design winding ( A , Npri ,
cu,pri
A cu,sec , N sec )
• Complete design of transformer as indicated.
Set S max
to desired S
Select • Check power dissipation and surface temperature using
larger assumed values of Jrmsand Bac. If dissipation or
core size temperature are excessive, select a larger core size and repeat
design steps until dissipation/temperature are acceptable.
No Check power dissipation Yes
and surface temperature.
Excessive?.
Done
Manual Inductor Design : Area-Product Method
• Use L IrmsIp = kcu Jrms Bac Aw Acore to find the required area
product Aw Acore and thus the core size.
• Assume Jrms= 2-4 A/mm2 and Bac = 50-100 mT.
• Large number of cores and core materials available makes it difficult for inexperienced designers to
make a reasonable first choice of core and core material for a particular application. Results in multiple
manual and time-consuming design iterations.
• Comparison of designs using different core geometries and materials (highly desirable if the smallest
sized component is to be found) impractical.
• Requires detailed information on all cores and core materials of interest which may be difficult to
find in a short time.
• Requires many lengthy manual(and hence error-prone) calculations.
• Manual area-product procedure best suited for one-off design situations or where rapid construction
and testing is more important than cost, size, or weight considerations.
Relating J and B to Core Size Quantitatively
• Assume simple thermal model of transformer (core+winding).
1. Losses uniformly distributed over entire transformer volume. P sp,core = Psp,winding = Psp
2. No significant temperature gradients in transformer interior. Tinterior ≈ Tsurface = Ts
Ts - Ta
• Psp = R ; R,sa = h/As
,sa(Vw + Vc)
• h = convective heat transfer coefficient = 10 C-m2/W B
• As = surface area of transformer (core + winding). Estimate Bs
Psp H
• Psp,co re = Psp = k cu cu (Jrms)2 or Jrms = kcu cu
[Psp]1/b - Bs
• Psp,co re = Psp = K c fa [ Bac]b or Bac =
[Kc]1/b[f]a/b
• Kc,a,b = constants of selected f errite material.
Example: E-core Geometric Parameters
2B C
1 • As = surface area of
(E-F)
2 assembled core plus surface
area of winding not included
A in core surface area.
• Complete information on core parameters (dimensions, areas, thermal resistance, etc.) and ferrite
material parameters (core loss) pre-stored in spreadsheet for all core and material types of interest.
• Spreadsheet calculates capability of all cores in database and displays smallest size core of each
type that meets transformer V- I or inductor LIrmsIp specifications.
• Also calculates and displays design output parameters including Jrms, B, Acu,pri, Acu,sec, Npri, Nsec,
leakage inductance, and efficiency of transformer or equivalent parameters for inductor.
• Multiple iterations of core material and winding conductor choices can be quickly done to aid in
selection of most appropriate tranformer/inductor design.
• Ability to compare different cores and core materials for same application limited only by number
of cores and materials entered in the database.
Example: Pre-Stored Potcore Parameters in Database
Phillips w/bobbin w/bobbin
2 3 2 3 2
designation [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm ] [mm ] [mm] [mm ] [mm ] [mm ] [ C/W]
Core # Dim. A Dim. B Dim. D1 Dim. D2 Dim. D3 Dim. D4 Dim. H1 Dim. H2 Lm Ac Vc Lw Aw Vw As R
P7/4 5.5 1.6 7.4 5.8 3.0 1.4 4.2 2.8 10.0 7.0 70.0 14.6 2.2 31.4 125.0 1066.9
P9/5 6.5 2.0 9.3 7.5 3.9 2.1 5.4 3.6 12.5 10.1 126.0 18.8 3.4 64.1 200.9 663.6
P11/7 6.8 2.2 11.3 9.0 4.7 2.2 6.5 4.4 15.5 16.2 251.0 22.7 4.8 108.3 294.5 452.8
P14/8 9.5 2.7 14.3 11.6 6.0 3.1 8.4 5.6 19.8 25.1 495.0 29.0 8.7 250.9 479.4 278.1
P18/11 13.4 3.8 18.4 14.9 7.6 3.1 10.6 7.2 25.8 43.3 1120.0 36.7 18.1 664.3 781.7 170.6
P22/13 15.0 3.8 22.0 17.9 9.4 4.4 13.4 9.2 31.5 63.4 2000.0 44.7 27.1 1211.4 1167.7 114.2
P26/16 18.0 3.8 25.5 21.2 11.5 5.4 16.0 11.0 37.6 93.9 3530.0 52.7 39.3 2071.1 1606.2 83.0
P30/19 20.5 4.3 30.0 25.0 13.5 5.4 18.8 13.0 45.2 137.0 6190.0 66.0 58.1 3834.6 2221.0 60.0
P36/22 26.2 4.9 36.2 29.9 16.2 5.4 21.7 14.6 53.2 202.0 10700.0 74.3 72.4 5379.3 3121.8 42.7
P42/29 32.0 5.1 42.2 35.6 17.7 5.4 29.4 20.3 68.6 265.0 18200.0 86.0 140.0 12040.0 4786.2 27.9
P66/56 7.0 66.3 53.5 28.8 6.4 55.8 42.0 123.0 717.0 88300.0 130.0 400.0 52000.0 13814.4 9.7
• Winding window parameters Lw, Aw, and Vw based on use of coil former or bobbin.
• Each core geometry has a separate worksheet similar to the potcore sheet shown above.
• E coress
• EC cores
• EFD cores
• EP cores
• EP cores
• ER cores
• ETD cores
• PM cores
• Potcores
• PQ cores
• RM-I cores
• U cores
Ferrite Materials in Spreadsheet Database
Ferrite Material Parameters
MANUFACT. SUGGESTED
Bsat MAX FREQ MATERIAL Kc a b µ a/µ o
[mT @ 100 ºC] [kHz] C(T) SIEMENS
370 1000 0.74353 N27 2.1566E-05 1 2.34 5000
350 1000 0.62004 N41 1.66E-04 1 1.98 4800
300 2000 0.79307 N49 1.2322E-06 1 2.89 2100
360 1000 1.058 N53 2.6E-06 1 2.666 4300
310 3000 1.01975 N59 5.66E-06 1 2.7926 1700
320 1000 0.66403 N61 1.26E-05 1 2.420 3600
340 1000 1.04602 N62 9.92E-07 1 2.808 4600
380 1000 1.25767 N63 1.9E-06 1 2.757 4700
340 1000 1.1317 N67 9.8288E-07 1 2.851 4300
330 1000 0.7942 N72 6.20E-07 1 2.869 4000
340 1000 1.2119 N87 4.12E-07 1 3.00 4600
PHILIPS
320 1000 0.7098 3B8 7.10E-07 1.6 2.5 4000
350 1000 1.19713 3C15 1.20E-07 1.7 2.8 5000
350 1000 1.416 3C30 4.25E-07 1.5 2.7 5000
310 100 1.0033 3C80 9.63E-06 1.42 2.2 4000
320 1000 0.6658 3C81 7.99E-07 1.56 2.55 5500
310 2000 1.0999 3C85 4.95E-07 1.6 2.6 4000
330 1000 1.1194 3C90 5.60E-07 1.5 2.6 5500
330 1000 1.1423 3C94 1.60E-07 1.6 2.7 5500
330 2000 0.9167 3F3 1.38E-06 1.3 2.5 4000
350 3000 0.9678 3F35 1.19E-08 1.5 3.52 2500
310 5000 0.8455 3F4 1.73E-07 1.35 3.11 1700
180 10000 0.88 4F1 1.58E-05 1.35 2.25 300
Transfer Data
• User inputs: Vpri, Ipri, Vsec f, Ts, Ta, and kcu for transformer; L, Irms, Ip, f, Ts, Ta, and kcu for inductor.
. 3. Leakage inductance Lleak= {µo{Npri}2 lw bw}/ {3 p2 hw} (E-core formula): Similar formulas for other cores.
• Spreadsheet examines capabilities of all cores and displays the smallest size core of each different geometry that
meets the requirements on the input-output page (INOUT) of the spreadsheet.
• Transformer outputs: core number, current and flux densities, total volume, conductor areas, number of primary
and secondary turns, leakage inductance, and efficiency (power out)/(power in).
• Inductor outputs: core number, current and flux densities, total volume, conductor area, number of turns, and
airgap length.
Input - Output Section of Inductor Design Tool
Design
Inputs
DESIGN
OUTPUTS
Skin, Prox.
Core Type Core # LIpIrms Jrms Bpeak N Acu Airgap Effects? Vc+Vw
2 2 3
[milliJoules] [A/mm ] [mT] [#] [mm ] [mm ] [cm ]
E-core E25/13/7 1.12 3.55 211.49 21.97 1.09 1.15 YES 6.47
EC-core EC35 2.26 3.28 199.54 15.54 1.18 0.61 YES 11.97
EFD-core #N/A 0.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
EP-core #N/A 0.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
ER-core ER28L 1.37 2.27 151.76 21.16 1.70 1.44 YES 12.55
ETD-core ETD29 1.71 3.10 191.00 18.00 1.25 0.93 YES 10.41
PM-core PM 50/39 12.38 2.33 154.81 4.56 1.66 0.20 YES 75.41
Potcore P30/19 1.36 2.57 166.47 11.46 1.50 0.66 YES 10.02
PQ-core PQ26/25 1.39 2.41 193.56 11.25 1.60 0.49 YES 9.21
RMI-core RM10/I 1.21 3.51 209.65 12.90 1.10 0.54 YES 6.54
U-core U20/16/7 1.18 3.32 201.28 23.19 1.16 1.10 YES 8.09
Notes
Any row having multiple cell entries of #N/A indicates the core in
that row cannot meet the input specifications. Cell entries with
for that cell. Entries in such cells should be ignored but the rest of
the entries in that row are still reliable. Airgap calculations are
Throughput
kcu Ta (ºC) Ts (ºC) Freq. [kHz] Material Vpri,rms Ipri,rms Vsec,rms Isec,rms Power [cm]
0.67 24 93 101 3C94 107 10.0 110 9.73 2140 0.02348256
67 100
3C94
Design Outputs
Notes
• Core capability versus frequency at fixed temperature. (Example given on next slide)
• Spreadsheet graphing capabilities very useful for presenting output data in clear graphical format
instead of harder-to-understand numerical tables. Examples given in next two slides.
• Users familiar with EXCEL can easily modify spreadsheet to automate calculations such as those
mentioned above as well as others.
Example: E Core V-A Capability vs Frequency