DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING Diagnostic imaging should be performed before any invasive procedure to avoid the possibility of soft tissue swelling or hemorrhage complicating the image interpretation.
Pretreatmentdiagnostic imaging is helpful for the ff:
1. Defining the size and anatomic location of a tumor and its proximity to adjacent structures 2. Staging disease with respect to regional or metastatic spread 3. Guiding percutaneous biopsy 4. Establishing whether a tumor is benign or malignant and low grade or high grade Ultrasonography Ultrasonography may have a diagnostic role in patients with soft tissue sarcoma who cannot undergo MRI. Ultrasonography can also be a useful adjunct to MRI when findings on MRI are indeterminate and for delineating adjacent vascular structures. Finally, ultrasonography can be used for postoperative surveillance and to guide biopsies. Computed Tomography Chest CT should be performed to evaluate for lung metastasis at presentation and before any radical treatment. CT is also the preferred imaging technique for evaluating retroperitoneal sarcomas. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. • MRI is the most useful imaging modality for extremity sarcomas because of its superior soft tissue contrast resolution and multiplanar capabilities. MRI accurately delineates muscle groups and distinguishes among bone, vascular structures, and tumor. • MRI may also be an important adjunct to cytologic analysis in distinguishing benign lesions such as lipomas, hemangiomas, schwannomas, neurofibromas, and intramuscular myxomas from their malignant counterparts. BIOPSY TECHNIQUE Fine-Needle Aspiration • At centers where cytopathologists have experience with evaluation of mesenchymal tumors, fine-needle aspiration is an acceptable method of diagnosing most soft tissue sarcomas, particularly when the results correlate closely with clinical and radiologic findings. Fine-needle aspiration of primary tumors has a lower diagnostic accuracy rate (60%–90%) than core needle biopsy and is often not sufficient for establishing a specific histologic diagnosis and grade. Core needle biopsy • safe, accurate, and economical and has become the preferred technique for diagnosing soft tissue lesions • accuracy of 93% in patients with musculoskeletal neoplasms. • Sonography/CT guidance can prevent sampling of nondiagnostic necrotic or cystic areas of the tumor and thus increase the positive yield rate. Sonography/CT guidance also permits biopsy of tumors in otherwise inaccessible locations and tumors located near vital structures. • The tissue sample obtained from core needle biopsy is usually sufficient for several diagnostic tests, such as electron microscopy, cytogenetic analysis, and flow cytometry. The reported complication rate for core needle biopsy is less than 1%. Incisional Biopsy • recommend incisional biopsy when core needle biopsy cannot produce adequate tissue for diagnosis or when findings on core needle biopsy are nondiagnostic. • Disadvantages of incisional biopsy include: 1. The need to schedule the procedure 2. The need for general anesthesia 3. High costs 4. Inappropriately placed incisions can necessitate more extensive definitive resection to encompass the biopsy site 5. Complication ates up to 17% have been reported. Potential complications include hematoma, infection, wound dehiscence, and tumor fungation, any of which can delay definitive treatment. Excisional Biopsy. • Performed for easily accessible (superficial) extremity or truncal lesions smaller than 3 cm. • Rarely provides benefits over other biopsy techniques • Wide en bloc excision is seldom performed as a diagnostic procedure. • When en bloc excision is done for diagnosis, the margin status is often not adequately evaluated during pathologic assessment of the specimen. Unless detailed descriptions of the surgical procedure and the pathology specimen are provided, the margins should be classified as uncertain or unknown, a classification associated with the same prognosis as resection margins that are positive for tumor cells.