Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What is DoLS?
By the end of this session you will have a understanding of the Mental
Capacity Act and its principles that underpin it.
Introduction
The Mental Capacity Act of 2005 was introduced because individuals within
Health & Social Care were not recognised to be able to make their own
decisions.
With this organisations would make decisions for the individual that they
believed were in the best interests of the individual.
What this meant was that individuals did not have their own say on how
they wanted or how their care would be provided for them. This meant
that individuals were not recognised as having sufficient capacity or
knowledge to make their own decisions.
What is Capacity?
The mental Capacity Act determines capacity as having the ability to make
a decision
Until all practical steps have been taken to help someone make a decision
without success, they can not be treated as lacking capacity.
An unwise decision does not in itself does not indicate a lack of capacity
Any act or decision made on behalf of the person lacking capacity must be
done in the persons best interests.
Any act or decision must be the least restrictive option to the person in
terms of rights and freedoms of action.
Code in Practice:
And
And
And
Best Interests
Having determined that a person lacks capacity best interests underpin our
actions and interventions: To make a best interest decision;
1. Consider all of the relevant circumstances
And
2. Consider whether there is likely that the person may have capacity in
some time in the future to the matter in question. Could this decision be
delayed so that the person can make the decision themselves?
And
3. Encourage, as far it is reasonably practicable, the person to participate in
any action undertaken for him in any decision affecting him. Even where
the person lacks capacity, they should not be excluded from the decision
making process.
Best interests
And
And
And
Best interests
And
7. consider the beliefs and values that would be likley to influence the
persons decision, for example religious, Cultural and lifestyle choices.
And
8. take into account other factors the person would be likely to consider if
he or she were able to do so
And
9. Consult and take account the views other key people as to what would
be in the persons best interests including; Anyone interested in his or her
welfare (Family, Friends, Informal Carers, other professionals) or any LPA or
Deputy appointed by the court of protection.
The person making the LPA chooses who will be their attorney. They
can allow the attorney to make all decisions or they can choose
which decisions they can make.
Once this has been officially registered they are now able to legally
make decisions of their appointed individual, whether this be
healthcare decisions, Finance or both.
Advance Decisions
Court of Protection
Is a specialist court with powers to deal with matters affecting adults who
may lack capacity to make particular decisions. The Court is able to hear
cases at a number of locations in England and Wales. It covers all areas of
decision making under the MCA and can determine whether a person has
capacity in relation to a particular decision,
Public Guardian
The MCA creates a new public office – the Public Guardian – with a range of
functions that contribute to the protection of people who lack capacity.
These functions include:
The Court of Protection only deals with complaints when all other
avenues have been tried.
The Human Rights convention says that every person has the right to
liberty.
Liberty means being free to do the things you want to do and live
where you want to live.
The safeguards are intended to protect people who lack mental capacity
from being detained when this is not in their best interests; to prevent
arbitrary detention; and to give people the right to challenge a decision.
The legislation sets out a procedure for care homes and hospitals to obtain
authorisation to deprive someone of their liberty. Without that
authorisation the deprivation of liberty will be unlawful. These safeguards
are intended to protect individuals from being deprived of their liberty
unless it is in their best interests to protect them from harm and there is no
other less restrictive alternative.
Continued
If it is believed to be in the person’s best interests and a less
restrictive regime is not possible, the hospital or care home
managers must apply to the supervisory body for authorisation of
the deprivation of liberty.
What is Restraint?
Restraint is the use, or threat, of force to enable something to
be done which the person is resisting; or the restriction of the
person’s movement (whether or not they resist). This is different
to deprivation of liberty. The Mental Capacity Act authorises
someone providing care or treatment to someone lacking
capacity to consent to it to use restraint if:
they reasonably believe it is in the person’s best interests;
they believe it is necessary to prevent harm to the person;
Who Assess?
There will be a minimum of two assessors because the mental health and
best interests assessments must be carried out by different people. Ideally,
the assessment procedure would not involve a series of different
interviews by different assessors because that might cause unnecessary
stress or disruption to the person being assessed.
In Conclusion