Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Evolution of
Management
Theory
2-2
The son of a poor Irish immigrant, Henry Ford was born in 1863 and
grew up on a farm in rural Michigan
Ford intended to change that: the Model T was to be for the masses
- a car that virtually anyone could afford
He understood that the only way to make such a car was to produce
it at high volume and low cost
One worker would perform the same task over and over, producing not a
finished part, but one of the operations necessary for the production of the whole;
the incomplete part would then be passed on to another worker, who would
contribute a successive operation
Ford was able to achieve remarkable efficiencies: Although the first Model T took
over 12 ½ hours to produce, only 12 years later, in 1920, Ford was producing
one Model T every minute
By 1925, at the peak of the car’s popularity, a Model T was rolling off Ford’s
assembly lines at the rate of one every 5 seconds
However, mechanization of the plant had some adverse effects. The faster Ford
pushed his workers, the more disgruntled they became. In 1913, turnover was 380
percent, and Ford had to hire ten times more workers than he needed just to keep
the line moving
2-6
Ford simply decided to double wages in order to get the best people and motivate
them to work even harder
In the days following the announcement that wages were being doubled, thousands
and thousands of men came to the Ford plant in search of work
When he died in 1945, Ford was worth over $600 million. He left an indelible mark on
both American industry and society. His name is synonymous with mass production
and the development of modern management theory
Most people associate Henry Ford with the Model T, the affordable mass-produced
automobile that changed society
Bureaucracy
2-8
ORGANISATION THEORY
EARLY
CLASSICAL APPROACHES
NEO-CLASSICAL APPROACHES
MODERN APPROACHES
2-9
It
includes Bureaucratic, Scientific and Administrative
management
2-10
Bureaucratic Management
Administrative Management
Scientific Management
1940 2000
2-11
Scientific Management
The concept of Scientific Management was developed by Frederick W. Taylor in late 18 th
century.
Scientific Management is the systematic study of the relationships between people and
tasks to redesign the work for higher efficiency.
Taylor sought to reduce the time a worker spent on each task by optimizing the way the
task was done.
The practice introduced by Frederick W.Taylor to accomplish the management job was to
use of scientific procedures to find the “one best way” to do a job
Taylor joined the American Society Of Mechanical Engineers in 1886 and used this organization to develop
and test the ideas he formulated while working in various steel firms
In one of these firms, Midvale Steel Company ,he observed workers producing far less than their capacities.
Taylor believed that this waste was due to ignorance of what constituted a fair day’s work
At that time, no studies had been conducted to determine expected daily output per worker and the
relationship between work standard and the wage system
He is most remembered for developing the “Time and Motion study”. He would break a job into its
component parts and measure each to the hundredth of a minute
Taylor believed that management could be formulated as an academic discipline, and that the best results
would come from the partnership between a trained and qualified management and a cooperative and
innovative workforce
2-13
Taylor’s Contribution
Five Principles to increase efficiency:
1. Time and Motion Study: Each step involved in a job was timed and observed. Several
alternatives were developed and the best way of doing a job was adopted.
2. Differential Payment: Taylor felt workers should benefit from higher output.
Incentives were linked with production to motivate workers and increase their
productivity.
4. Scientific Recruitment and Training: Quality selection and training. Focus on core
competence of workers to increase productivity.
5. Co-operation between the Management and Workers: Management and labor should
understand that they have a common goal i.e., increasing productivity.
2-14
Administrative Management
Scientific management, which deals largely with jobs and work at the individual level, administrative
management provides a more general theory of management
Henri Fayol (1841-1925) is considered as the Father of Administrative Management theory also “the
Father of modern operational management theory”
Fayol ’ s perspective extended beyond the shop level and the physical production processes and was
of a macro nature covering the general administrative and managerial functions and processes at
the organizational level.
Fayol's approach was more in sync with his idea of Authority which stated that the right to give orders
should not be considered without the acceptance and understanding of responsibility
2-16
Planning
Organizing
Commanding
Coordinating
Controlling
2-17
Fayol’s Principles
Henri Fayol, developed a set of 14 principles:
1. Division of Labour: allows for job specialization. Fayol
noted firms can produce more and better work with the same
effort.
2. Authority and Responsibility: A manager may exercise
formal authority and personal power.Responsibilty is closely
related to authority and it arises wherever authority is
exercised.
3. Unity of Command: Employees should have only one boss.
4. Scalar Chain: a hierarchy chain from top to bottom of the
firm for the purpose of communication.
5. Centralization: is the degree to which authority rests at the
very top. If subordinates are given more role and importance
it is decentralization.
2-18
Fayol’s Principles
6. Unity of Direction: One plan of action to guide the
organization.
7. Equity: Treat all employees fairly in justice and
respect.
8. Order: Each employee is put where they have the most
value i.e right place for everything and every man.
9. Initiative: Encourage innovation.
10. Discipline: obedience to authority, observance of the
rules and norms, sincere efforts for completing the given
job, respect for superiors etc.
2-19
Fayol’s Principles
11. Remuneration of Personnel: The payment system
contributes to success i.e. fair remuneration.
12. Stability of Tenure: Turnover is disruptive; shared
experience is important .Long-term employment is
important.
13. General interest over individual interest: The
organization takes precedence over the individual.
14. Esprit de corps: There is a need for harmony and
unity within the organization .Share enthusiasm or
devotion to the organization.
2-20
Administrative Management
Theory
Max Weber
Hawthorne Experiments
Behavioral Management
Behavioral Management
Mary Parker Follett
Concerned that Taylor ignored the human side of
the organization
Modern Approaches
Quantitative Approach
Systems Approach
Contingency Approach
2-34
Quantitative Approach
Uses
rigorous quantitative techniques to
maximize resources.
Quantitative management: utilizes linear
programming, modeling, simulation systems.
Operations management: techniques to analyze all
aspects of the organization’s production system.
Total Quality Management (TQM): focuses on
improved product quality.
Management Information Systems (MIS): provides
information vital for effective decision making.
2-35
Figure 2.4
2-38
Systems Approach
Considersrelationships inside and outside the
organization.
The environment consists of forces, conditions, and
influences outside the organization.
Systems theory considers the impact of
stages:
Input: acquire external resources.
Conversion: inputs are processed into goods and
services.
Output: finished goods are released into the
environment.
2-39
Closed System
A self-contained system that is not affected by changes in
its external environment.
2-40
Systems Considerations
Anopen system interacts with the
environment. A closed system is self-
contained.
Closed systems often undergo entropy and lose
the ability to control itself, and fails.
2-41
Systems
Synergy – the performance gains that result from the
combined actions of individuals and departments
Possible only in
an organized system
2-42
Contingency Theory
Assumes there is no one best way to manage.
The environment impacts the organization and
managers must be flexible to react to
environmental changes.
The way the organization is designed, control
systems selected, depend on the environment.
Technological
environments change rapidly,
so must managers.
2-43
Type of Structure
Mechanistic Structure
Authority is centralized at the top.
Emphasis is on strict discipline and order
Type of Structure
Organic Structure
Authority is decentralized throughout the
organization.
Departments are encouraged to take a cross-
departmental or functional perspective
Works best when environment is unstable and
rapidly changing
2-45
Thank You