Face recognition: sparse representation

classification with edge orientation

matching on Smart phones

Faculty Guide By
Poorva Agrawal Minichel Abiye
PRN 16070144043
Introduction
 Face recognition has attracted considerable attentions for the
past over twenty years in computer vision and pattern recognition.
In this issue, one of the most important challenges is
to project the face images in high-dimensional space into low
dimensional space before recognition due to its high costs in time
and space.
 In order to enhance the classification performance,
dimensionality reduction is usually applied to most of the face
recognition tasks
 Face recognition using images presents problems such as variances
in pose, illumination and occlusion.
Challenges of Face Recognition
 Major challenges of face recognition:
 Illumination variation
 Images of the same face look different because the
change of the light.
 Pose Variation
 Same face in different angles could give a different
output.
Sample Training Images with different illumination,
pose and occlusion
Literature Review
 In the area of face detection and recognition, edge orientation
matching has been checked its accuracy label by making a
comparison with other face detection models [7].
 In sparse representation, random matrices are often used to
reduce the dimensionality of the problem while preserving the
accuracy of the applications. They have been applied to speed up
background subtraction on the embedded system [4] and Face
detection and recognition in an unconstrained environment for the
mobile visual assistive system [3].
 In [2] [16] and [18], SRC is used for classification and a column
reduction procedure is proposed to reduce the dimension of ℓ1-
minimisation.
 Note that column reduction to the techniques of projection matrix
optimisation and compressed residuals proposed in [7] is
complimentary; all three can be applied to look up the
performance of SRC
Cont..
 The previous work by Xu et al. [15] proposed a sensor-
assisted face recognition system for smart glasses based on
SRC which exploited face images from multi-view angles to
improve the recognition accuracy
 To further improve the recognition accuracy, Y. Fu [6] jointly
considered the data locality and optimised sparsity to
formulate the sparse representation classifier.
 As our major contribution in this paper is the optimised
projection matrix which is transparent to the usage of
different optimized sparsity models, we apply the standard
lasso norm to formulate the face recognition problem.
Sample Training Images with different illumination,
pose and occlusion
Proposed Solution

 Many dictionary learning models exploit only the

discriminative information in either the representation
coefficients or the representation residual, which limits
their performance.

 Papers uses edge orientation matching in collaboration with

optimized SRC algorithms and Tabu search algorithm for
searching the best matching on test data.
Proposed Solution
 from the above ten papers nine off them are not
using edge detection as preprocessing.
The remaining one paper tries to compare the edge
matching with Harr-like principle and the result
shows former is better.
This paper different form the base paper is here
applying edge orientation matching for face
detection as a preprocessing for best recognition. In
short describes as the following:
Flow diagram
Image/video input

Pre-Processing

Face detection

Classification

Face normalization

DB based feature matching

Face recognition
 Use case Diagram

11
 Activity Diagram

12
 Sequence Diagram for Detection

13
 Sequence Diagram for Face recognition

14
Conclusion
 In this paper, an edge orientation matching in collaboration
with optimised sparse representation classifier is proposed in
a way that we can apply to smartphones. It is a sparse
representation based method which jointly achieves
dictionary learning and dimensionality reduction. The
proposed method enhances the classification ability and gains
more discriminate information. Experimental results on two
databases, AR and Yale B show that the two proposed
algorithms outperform their original algorithms inefficiency,
without reducing
robustness and accuracy.
Reference
 Cao, F., Feng, X., & Zhao, J. (2017). Sparse representation for robust face
recognition by dictionary decomposition. Journal ofVisual Communication and
Image Representation, 46, 260-268.
 Chaudhry, S., & Chandra, R. (2017). Face detection and recognition in an
unconstrained environment for mobile visual assistive system. Applied Soft
Computing, 53, 168-180.
 Chen,Y., & Su, J. (2017). Sparse embedded dictionary learning on face
recognition. Pattern Recognition, 64, 51-59.
 Ding, C., & Tao, D. (2017). Pose-invariant face recognition with homography-
based normalization. Pattern Recognition, 66, 144-152.
 Fu,Y., Wu, X., Wen,Y., & Xiang,Y. (2017). Efficient locality-constrained
occlusion coding for face recognition. Neurocomputing.
 Guennouni, S., Ahaitouf, A., & Mansouri, A. (2017, April). Face detection:
Comparing Haar-like combined with cascade classifiers and Edge Orientation
Matching. In Wireless Technologies, Embedded and Intelligent Systems (WITS), 2017
International Conference on (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
Cont..
 Huang, W., & Yin, H. (2017). Robust face recognition with structural binary
gradient patterns. Pattern Recognition, 68, 126-140.
 Hu, J. (2017). Discriminative transfer learning with sparsity regularization for
single-sample face recognition. Image andVision Computing, 60, 48-57.
 Li, H., Shen, F., Shen, C.,Yang,Y., & Gao,Y. (2016). Face recognition using
linear representation ensembles. Pattern Recognition, 59, 72-87.
 Liu, T., Mi, J. X., Liu,Y., & Li, C. (2016). Robust face recognition via sparse
boosting representation. Neurocomputing, 214, 944-957.
 Nanni, L., Lumini, A., & Brahnam, S. (2017). Ensemble of texture descriptors
for face recognition obtained by varying feature transforms and preprocessing
approaches. Applied Soft Computing, 61, 8-16.
 Shen,Y.,Yang, M., Wei, B., Chou, C. T., & Hu, W. (2017). Learn to recognise:
exploring priors of sparse face recognition on smartphones. IEEE Transactions on
Mobile Computing, 16(6), 1705-1717.
 Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 140, 853-859.
Cont..
 Su,Y., Gao, X., & Yin, X. C. (2017). Fast alignment for sparse representation
based face recognition. Pattern Recognition, 68, 211-221.
 Xu, W., Shen,Y., Bergmann, N., & Hu, W. (2016, April). Sensor-assisted face
recognition system on smart glass via multi-view sparse representation
classification. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Information
Processing in Sensor Networks (p. 2). IEEE Press.
 Yu,Y. F., Dai, D. Q., Ren, C. X., & Huang, K. K. (2017). Discriminative multi-
scale sparse coding for single-sample face recognition with occlusion. Pattern
Recognition, 66, 302-312.
 Zeng, S.,Yang, X., & Gou, J. (2017). Using kernel sparse representation to
perform coarse-to-fine recognition of face images. Optik-International Journal for
Light and Electron Optics, 140, 528-535.
 Zhang, J., Wang, J., & Cai, X. (2017). Sparse locality preserving discriminative
projections for face recognition. Neurocomputing.
 Zhu, N., & Chen, S. (2017). Weighted sparse representation based on virtual
test samples for face recognition. Optik-International