RCTQ

SESSION 6
PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT
 RCTQ

Objectives
At the end of this activity, the participants
should be able to:
• Define and understand the Portfolio
Assessment Process
• Identify tools and forms to be used in the
assessment of Teacher Portfolio
• Rate the Portfolio and compute its rating
RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Activity 1 (5 minutes)
Short Game: Assessment Alphabet
Instructions:
1. In your group, complete the alphabet from A-Z
with the terms associated with the RPMS
Portfolio Assessment, e.g A – Assessment; B –
Beginning; C – Curriculum.
2. Write your answers in a manila paper.
3. The first group to finish and present their
(acceptable) answers, wins the game.
RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Activity 2 (5 minutes)
Round Table Discussion
Instructions:
In your group, discuss the following questions:
a. Do you assess teacher portfolios?
b. Who assess teacher portfolios?
c. Why do you assess teacher portfolios?
d. How do you assess teacher portfolios?
 RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Portfolio Assessment Process

I. Performance
Planning &
Commitment

Pre-Assessment
IV. Performance
II. Performance
Rewarding and
Development Assessment Monitoring &
Coaching
Planning
Post-Assessment

III. Performance
Review &
Evaluation

The Portfolio assessment process is done across all phases of RPMS.

RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Pre-assessment
RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Steps in Pre-Assessment Phase

• Review the Philippine Professional Standards for
Step Teachers
1
• Determine the corresponding RPMS tool for the
Step teacher/ratee
2
• Guide the Ratee in understanding the appropriate
Step RPMS Tool and the IPCRF
3

Step • Advise the teacher/ratee to accomplish the IPCRF.

4
• Guide the teachers in preparing documents and
Step organizing Portfolio
5
• Upon submission of the Teacher Portfolio,
Step authenticate documents
6
RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Assessment
RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Steps in the Assessment Phase

Step 1: Rate the Portfolio based on the MOV presented.

Examine the MOV presented by the teacher and rate

the teacher’s level of performance using the 5-point
scale: 5 – Outstanding; 4 - Very Satisfactory;
3 – Satisfactory; 2 – Unsatisfactory; 1 - Poor
 RCTQ

What rate will Teacher Grace get?

RCTQ
 RCTQ

COT Rating 7 7 7 7
RPMS 5-point scale rating 4 4 4 4
 RCTQ

COT Rating RPMS 5-Point Scale Rating

7 = 4
7 = 4
7 = 4
7 4
16
16 ÷ 4 = 4
 RCTQ

Weight per
Q E T Total Average Rating
Objective

4 5 - 9 4.500 7.5% 0.337

Therefore, Teacher Grace got a rating of 4 for Quality by

submitting 4 COT rating sheets with an average rating of 7,
supported by DLLs, instructional materials used,
performance tasks/test materials and results of assessment.
She also got a rating of 5 for Efficiency having
submitted the required number of MOV.
 RCTQ

What rate will Teacher Adelyn get?

RCTQ
 RCTQ

Weight per
Q E T Total Average Rating
Objective

3 3 3 9 3.000 7.5% 0.225

Therefore, Teacher Adelyn got a rating of 3

(Satisfactory) for Quality as evidenced by the valid
MOV.
Although she submitted 4 MOV, only 2 were valid which
gave her a rating of 3 for Efficiency.

She submitted these MOV across 2 quarters; hence,

she got a rating of 3 for Timeliness.
 RCTQ

There are instances, however, that Teachers

may submit classroom observation rating
sheets that have different ratings.

For example, a Teacher III may submit 4 COT

rating sheets:
• COT 1 with a rating of 7;
• COT 2 with a rating of 6;
• COT 3 and 4 with a rating of 5.
 RCTQ

To get the rating for Quality, the following steps must be

done:
• Identify the corresponding rating in the RPMS 5-point
scale for each COT rating. Refer to the table below for
the mapping of COT Rating for Proficient Teachers and
Highly Proficient Teachers and their equivalent rating in
the RPMS 5-point scale.
In this case, Teacher III, got the following rating:
RCTQ

Get the average of the total RPMS rating. The average

rating will be your rating for Quality. In Teacher III’s case,
the average is 3.75, as show in the table below.
 RCTQ

• Determine the final rating for Quality by

referring to the table below. Teacher III got an
average of 3.75 and his or her final rating for
Quality is 4 (Very Satisfactory):
 RCTQ

Steps in the Assessment Phase

Step 2: Explain your Rating, if needed.

To help the Ratees enrich their Portfolios, provide reasons

for your rating and suggest strategies in improving the
quality of the Portfolios.
RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

How to compute the Portfolio Rating?

RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

How to compute the Portfolio Rating?

RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

How to compute the Portfolio Rating?

RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

How to compute the Portfolio Rating?

RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

How to compute the Portfolio Rating?

RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

How to compute the Portfolio Rating?

 RCTQ

You may use the suggested summary sheet below in the

computation of the numerical rating of your RPMS
Portfolio.
RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Sample IPRCRF with overall rating for accomplishments.

RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Mid-year Review
• Assess the Teacher Portfolio using the
Step IPCRF and the suggested Mid-year
1 Review Form (MRF).
• Conduct Mid-year assessment
Step conference to discuss your initial ratings
2 with the Ratees.

• Discuss with the Ratees their respective

Step performance concerns.
3
• Step 4: Monitor teacher performance
and coach them using the Performance
Step Monitoring and Coaching Form (PMCF)
4 and/or Midyear Review Form (MRF).
RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Suggested Mid-Year Review Form

RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Performance Monitoring and Coaching Form

RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

How do you assess the Competencies?

RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ
RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ
RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Post-assessment
RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Post-Assessment

Explain accomplishments, corresponding rewards or

possible incentives. Finally, assist Ratees in preparing
their Development Plans for the following year.
RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ
RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ
RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ
RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ
RPMS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

WORKSHOP

Instruction
Following the portfolio assessment process in the
RPMS Manual, rate the provided Sample Portfolio
Scenarios using the RPMS Tools and forms.
 RCTQ

Teacher Mark, Teacher III, submitted the following

MOV for Objective 1:
4 COT Rating Sheets
• COT 1 has a rating of 5, COT 2 and 3 are rated 6; and
COT 4 has a rating of 7
• COT 1, 2 and 3 are each supported by Lessons plans/
modified DLLs developed highlighting integration of
content knowledge within and across subject areas
• COT 4 is supported by Test materials highlighting
integration of content knowledge within and across
subject areas
What rating should Teacher Mark get?
Weight per RATING
Objective Score
Q E T Total Average
RCTQ
RCTQ
RCTQ
RCTQ
RCTQ
 RCTQ

COT Rating RPMS 5-Point Scale Rating

5 = 3
6 = 4
6 = 4
7 = 5
16
 RCTQ

COT Rating RPMS 5-Point Scale Rating

5 = 3
6 = 4
6 = 4
7 = 5
16
16 ÷ 4 = 4
 RCTQ

Weight per RATING

Objective Score
Q E T Total Average

7.5 % 4 5 - 9 4.500 0.337

 RCTQ

Teacher Gerlie, Master Teacher I, submitted the

following MOV for Objective 4, KRA 2:
• 3 COT Rating sheets with the rating of 8, 6 and 7.
• 3 Lessons plans/ modified DLLs highlighting various
classroom management strategies that engage
learners in activities/tasks in different physical learning
environments as support for each COT rating sheets

What rating should Teacher Gerlie get?

Weight per RATING
Objective Score
Q E T Total Average
RCTQ
RCTQ
RCTQ
RCTQ
 RCTQ

RPMS 5-Point Scale Rating 5 3 4

COT Rating 8 6 7
 RCTQ

COT Rating RPMS 5-Point Scale Rating

8 = 5
6 = 3
7 = 4
12

12 ÷ 3 = 4
 RCTQ

Weight per RATING

Objective Score
Q E T Total Average

7.5 % 4 4 - 8 4.000 0.300

 RCTQ

Teacher Bernadette submitted the following MOV for

Objective 2, KRA 1:
• Copy of the research proposal focused on enriching
knowledge of content and pedagogy
• Proof of participation and/or contribution to a collaborative
research
• Certified completed research focused on enriching
knowledge of content and pedagogy
• Proof of utilization of research findings with colleagues
Teacher Bernadette was also able to disseminate her research
to her colleagues.
What rating should Teacher Bernadette get?
Weight per RATING
Objective Score
Q E T Total Average
RCTQ
RCTQ
RCTQ
RCTQ
RCTQ
RCTQ
 RCTQ

Weight per RATING

Objective Score
Q E T Total Average

7.5 % 5 5 5 15 5.000 0.375

 RCTQ

Teacher Michael submitted the following MOV for

Objective 13, Plus Factor:
• Photocopy of Performance Mentoring and Coaching Form
• Certificate for Division Level Speakership
• Certificate of Participation in an International Seminar
• Represented the principal in 3-day budget preparation
workshop
• Observation Sheets on the observed classes of T1-T3
• Photocopy of the Cover Page of the Research Journal and
the Research Article Published

What rating should Teacher Michael get?

Weight per RATING
Objective Score
Q E T Total Average
RCTQ
RCTQ
RCTQ
RCTQ
RCTQ
RCTQ
RCTQ
RCTQ
 RCTQ

Weight per RATING

Objective Score
Q E T Total Average

10 % 5 5 - 10 5.000 0.500
 RCTQ

Teacher Karina, Teacher II, submitted the following

MOV for Objective 8, KRA 3:
• LAC Session notes on enhancing the development of
Instructional Materials with proof of attendance
• LAC Session notes on School Roll-out of the RPMS for
Teachers and School Heads
• LAC Session notes on Faculty Capacity Building on Action
Research with proof of attendance
• Annotation on the LAC session on 2C2I1R Approach in
Teaching highlighting the use of teacher and learner
feedback to enrich teaching practice
What rating should Teacher Karina get?

Weight per RATING

Objective Score
Q E T Total Average
RCTQ
RCTQ
RCTQ
RCTQ
RCTQ
RCTQ
 RCTQ

Weight per RATING

Objective Score
Q E T Total Average

7.5 % 3 3 - 6 3.000 0.225

 RCTQ

Teacher Myles, Teacher I, submitted the following

MOV for Objective 5, KRA 2:
• 3 Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheets on 6
lessons about teacher management of learner behavior
using at least 7 given acceptable strategies supported by
annotations
• COT 1, 2 and 3 about teacher management of learner
behavior are rated 5, 6 and 7, respectively
What rating should Teacher Myles get?
Weight per RATING
Objective Score
Q E T Total Average
RCTQ
RCTQ
RCTQ
RCTQ
 RCTQ

COT Rating RPMS 5-Point Scale Rating

5 = 3
6 = 4
7 = 5
12
 RCTQ

COT Rating RPMS 5-Point Scale Rating

5 = 3
6 = 4
7 = 5
12

12 ÷ 3 = 4
 RCTQ

Weight per RATING

Objective Score
Q E T Total Average

7.5 % 4 4 - 8 4.000 0.300

RCTQ
 RCTQ

THANK YOU!