Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The only way in which the inflow can be kept high, once the well has
been stimulated to reduce reservoir pressure drop to a minimum, is by
pressure maintenance or secondary recovery.
This will eventually be initiated in most oil reservoirs, but methods are
available to reduce the flowing wellbore pressure by artificial means, that
is, to modify the outflow performance of the well.
2
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
3
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
4
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
5
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
A. Well Performance
6
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
7
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
The formation GLR must be used to calculate Op (tubing below valve),
and the total GLR must be used above the valve. As the injected GLR
becomes too large, the increase in piping system pressure drop due to
friction will exceed the decrease in the hydrostatic pressure in the
tubing above the valve. This is illustrated in Figure bellow.
8
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
The intersections of the inflow and outflow curves give the liquid
production rate corresponding to each injected GLR. The required
volume of gas to be injected can then be calculated, and a plot of liquid
production rate versus gas injection rate can be constructed. This is
illustrated in Figure bellow.
9
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
The effect of injection depth and, therefore, injection pressure required
on liquid production rate can be determined by repeating the procedure
illustrated in Figure 5-3 for various injection depths. This would result in
a different plot of qL, versus qinj, for each injection depth, as illustrated
in Figure bellow.
10
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
Once the liquid production rate and gas injection rate are determined,
the pressure existing in the tubing at the injection depth can be
determined. The required surface operating pressure for the injected
gas can then be estimated from:
11
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CASE STUDY CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
12
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CASE STUDY CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
13
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CASE STUDY CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
14
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CASE STUDY CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
15
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CASE STUDY CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
16
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CASE STUDY CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
17
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CASE STUDY CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
18
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CASE STUDY CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
19
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CASE STUDY CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
20
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
B. Valve Spacing
21
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
22
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
The procedure is illustrated graphically by making a plot of pressure versus
depth, such as in Figure bellow.
23
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
1. Gas Lift Valve Performance
As was discussed earlier, one of the requirements for gas lift valve
design is that one must be able to open any valve without opening
the valve above it in the well.
24
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
25
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
Most gas lift valves can be placed into one of two broad
categories for anlysis.
These categories are called Injection Pressure or casing
pressure operated valves and Production Pressure or fluid
operated valves.
The two types are shown in Figures bellow 5-14 and 5-15.
Only one type of valve will be considered in Course, the
unbalanced pressure charged valve that is primarily
responsive to injection or casing pressure, Figure 5.14.
26
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT
27
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
ELECTRIC SUBMERSIBLE PUMP
28
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
ELECTRIC SUBMERSIBLE PUMP
29
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
ELECTRIC SUBMERSIBLE PUMP
30
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
ELECTRIC SUBMERSIBLE PUMP
31
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
ELECTRIC SUBMERSIBLE PUMP
32
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
SUCKER ROD OR BEAM PUMPING
Sucker rod pumping is the most widely used artificial lift method. That is,
more artificial lift wells are equipped with rod pumps than any other type
of artificial lift method. This does not mean that more oil is produced by
rod pumping, since many rod-pumped wells produce at very low rates.
33
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
SUCKER ROD OR BEAM PUMPING
A schematic of a rod-pumped well and the corresponding traverse are
shown in Figures 5-29 and 5-30.
34
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
SUCKER ROD OR BEAM PUMPING
35
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
SUCKER ROD OR BEAM PUMPING
A more detailed representation of the pump and the operating sequence
is shown in Figure 5-31.
36
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
SUCKER ROD OR BEAM PUMPING
A method for measuring the fluid level in a well is illustrated and
described in Figures 5-32 and 5-33.
37
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
SUCKER ROD OR BEAM PUMPING
38
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
HYDRAULIC PUMP
HYDRAULIC PUMPING
39
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
HYDRAULIC PUMP
40
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
HYDRAULIC PUMP
41
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
HYDRAULIC PUMP
42
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection
Artificial Lift Design
Production rate SCREENING CRITERIA
Gas Lift
The full range of production rates can be handled. An AOF production rate
cannot be achieved with gas lift because as much drawdown as for an ESP
cannot be achieved.
ESP
PCP
Rod Pump
Jet Pump
43
Production Optimization – Artificial Lift Selection