Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Organization as a
Process
Organization as a
Framework of
Relationships
Organization as
group of persons
Organization as a
system
IMPORTANCE OF ORGANIZATIONAL
STRUCTURE
Structure
system of tasks, reporting relationships, and communication that links
people and positions within an organization.
Organization Charts
describe the formal structure, how an organization should ideally work.
The Organization Chart
8
Key elements in org.structure
9
Key elements in Organizational
Structure
Line function
Staff functions
Authority: in context of a business organization
authority can be defined as the power and right of
the person to use and allocate the resources
efficiently, to take decisions and to give orders so
as to achieve the organizational objectives
Responsibility: obligation to act
Delegation: assignment of any responsibility or
authority to another person (normally from a
manager to a subordinate ) to carry out specific
activities
Accountability : accept responsibility for tasks
Types of Organizational Structures
1. Simple Structure
2. Functional Structure
3. Divisional Organization Structure
4. Matrix Organization Struct
5. Virtual Organization
11
Simple Structure
EEXXHHIIBBIITT15-4
15-4
Copyright © 2012 Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd
Authorized adaptation from the United States edition of Organizational Behavior, 14e
15-12
Functional Structure
Functional Structure
An organizational form in which the major
functions of the firm, such as production,
marketing, R&D, and accounting, are
grouped internally.
10-13
Functional Structure
15
Functional Structure
Structure for
President
a business
Vice
Vice Vice Vice
President,
President, President, President,
Human
Marketing Finance Production
Resources
Chief
Structure for Administrator
a hospital
10-17
Functional structure
Advantages Disadvantages
Enhanced Could be
coordination and differences in
control values and
Centralized Decision orientations
making May lead to short
Enhanced term thinking
organizational level Difficult to set
perspective uniform
Efficient use of performance
manpower standards
Moving to a
Divisional Structure
Organizations most commonly adopt
the divisional structure to solve
control problems that arise with too
many products, regions, or customers
The type of divisional structure
depends on the problem to be solved
Divisional structure creates smaller,
more manageable subunits and takes
the form
Product structure
Geographic structure
Customer structure
19
Product Structure
20
Product Divisional Structure
OBM Company
Small Large
Large Building
Building Lawn
Lawn and
Commercial
Commercial Automotive
Automotive
Household Household
Household Materials
Materials and
and Garden
Garden
Appliances
Appliances Products
Appliances
Appliances Appliances Products
Products Products
Products
Divisional Structure :Geographic
Structure
When the control problems that
companies experience are a
function of geography, a geographic
divisional structure is appropriate
Allows the organization to adjust its
structure to align its core
competences with the needs of
customers in different geographic
regions
Allows some functions to be
centralized and others
decentralized
22
Figure: Geographic Structure
23
Divisional Structure :Customer
Divisional Structures
Hybrid Structures
Product
Divisional
President
Structure
Vice-
Vice- Vice- Vice- Functional
President,
President, President, President, divisional
Human
Production Marketing Finance structure
Resources
Project
Manager,
Mustang
Subordinate
Project reports to
Manager, both Vice
Explorer President of
marketing &
Project
Manager, to project
Expedition
Manager for
Mustang
Example of Ford Motor Company 29
ORGANIZATION STRUCTURES
Matrix Structures
Advantages Disadvantages
Decentralized High administration
decision making costs
Strong product Potential confusion
coordination over authority and
Fast response to responsibility
change High prospects of
Flexible use of conflict
resources' Excessive focus on
internal relations
Virtual Organizations
Contractual
Contractual relationships
relationships
Constant
Constant change
change and
and reconfiguration
reconfiguration
No
No rigid
rigid boundaries
boundaries
Flexible
Flexible
Little
Little or
or personal
personal and
and social
social contact
contact
Virtual Organizations:
Design Implications
Contractual
Contractual relationships
relationships
Constant
Constant change
change and
and reconfiguration
reconfiguration
No
No rigid
rigid boundaries
boundaries
Flexible
Flexible
Little
Little or
or personal
personal and
and social
social contact
contact
Virtual Organizations:
Consequences
15-36
Future