At the core of performance – PART 2

1
May 2009
 SPECIAL SOLUTIONS

 HYPRON, Lead Free Technology

 Fire PerformanceTechnologies

2
May 2009
 Nexans Oil&Gas expertise towards

Hypron® Lead Free Technology

3
Total presentation
May 2009
 Onshore Hypron®
Cables

HYPRON®
Aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons resistant

 Current practices
 Petrochemical & Refinery soils environments : Risk of insulation damages &
penetration of chemical products (acids, bases, aliphatic and aromatic
hydrocarbons) towards the conductors.
== Cables are protected against external chemical products by a
conventional lead sheath.

 However , Lead is not recyclable and risk of groundwater contamination

Need to develop a new chemical barrier,

environmentally friendly.

4
Total presentation
May 2009
 Onshore Hypron®
Cables
HYPRON®
Aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons resistant

 As an alternative to lead sheath, Nexans has developed a new barrier made of

three construction elements:
 AluPE: Aluminium coated tape “sealed barrier” applied longitudinally
 HDPE sheath: High Density Polyethylene Sheath
 PA sheath: Polyamide Sheath

 Co-extrusion process allowing a powerful adhesion of these 3 sheaths.

Aluminium + HDPE + Polyamide

Watertight Resistant to Resistant to
inorganic chemicals organic chemicals

HYPRON®
5
Total presentation
May 2009
 Onshore Hypron®
Cables
Design

AluPE tape
Lead sheathing HDPE sheath
PA sheath
6
Total presentation
May 2009
 Onshore Hypron®
Cables
Design

AluPE tape
Lead sheathing HDPE sheath
PA sheath
7
Total presentation
May 2009
 Onshore Hypron®
Cables
 Polyamides are known for their resistance to a wide range of chemicals, different
Properties
types of oil and greases.

2 Hypron® technologies are available depending on Polyamide:

 Standard Hypron® version
 Improved Hypron® version with fire performances, based on HFFR Polyamide

Standard HFFR
Physical properties Standard
polyamide Polyamide
Density (g/cm3) ISO 1183 1,13 1,17
Moisture absorption
- Humidity absorption (23°C / 50% RH) ISO 62 2,5% 2,5%
- Water absorption (23°C) 9,5% 9,0%
Mechanical properties
- Tensile modulus (@ 1 mm/min)
3150 MPa 3800 MPa
- Yield stress (@ 50 mm/min) ISO 527-1
85 MPa 80 MPa
- Nominal strain at break (@ 50
45% 50%
mm/min)
Flammability
- at thickness @ 1,6 mm UL94 - Pass (V-0)
- at thickness @ 0,38 mm - Pass (V-0) 8
Total presentation
May 2009
 Hypron®
Electrical properties of insulation
Insula tion resista nce
(IRM 903 oil)
32000 160°C
EI 2046 (Lead)

EI 2048 (Hypron)
28000 140°C

24000 120°C
Temperature

20000 100°C

Te mpe ra ture (°C)

80°C
Ri
16000

12000 60°C

8000 40°C

4000 20°C

0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Time (hours)

9
Total presentation
May 2009
 Onshore Hypron®
Cables
 Objectives: Ageing tests
 Remain mechanical properties of insulation materials above 50% vs. initial values
 Mechanical properties evolution:
 Tensile strength (MPa)
 Elongation at break (%)

 Duration of ageing tests: 74 weeks.

 Standard references:
 EN 60811-1-1: mechanical properties measurement
 No sign of gases or liquid inside the cable after tests ….

 Construction:
 Core / insulation 4 x 2,5mm² XLPE with or without mica tape
 Bedding
 Hypron technology: Alu/PE tape + HDPE+ PA6
 Outer sheath: PVC
10
Total presentation
May 2009
 Onshore Hypron®
Cables
 Comparison:
 Ageing test in Oil IRM 903 @ 90°C Ageing tests
 Evolution of Tensile strength (MPa) and Elongation at break (%) on insulation
materials
 Compositions:
 4 x 2,5mm² XLPE – Bedding – AluPE – HDPE - PA6 - PVC
 4 x 2,5mm² mica/XLPE
Elongation at break -(%)
Bedding - AluPE - HDPE - PA6 - Tensile
PVC strength (MPa)
500 20.0

450 18.0

400 16.0

350 14.0

300 12.0

250 50% initial properties 10.0

50% initial properties
200 8.0

150 6.0

100 XLPE in IRM 903 4.0

XLPE in IRM 903

50 Mica/XLPE in IRM 903 2.0 Mica/XLPE in IRM 903

0 0.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 20 40 60 8011
Weeks Weeks
May 2009
 Onshore Hypron®
Cables
Technical data sheet
HYPRON®
Aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons resistant

 Technology is applicable in:

 Instrumentation cables
 Low voltage cables
 Medium voltage cables
 Armoured and non armoured versions
 Specific fire performances
…

12
Total presentation
May 2009
 Onshore Hypron® Cables
LV cable according to IEC 60502-1
Low Voltage cable
Lead sheath Hypron® Variation (%)
(3 x 150 mm²)
Diameter (mm) 55 50 -9.1%
Weight (kg) 11306 8761 -22.5%
Price (€) - - -13.0%

Low Voltage cable

Lead sheath Hypron® Variation (%)
(12 x 2.5 mm²)
Diameter (mm) 26 23 -11.5%
Weight (kg) 2249 1279 -43.1%
Price (€) - - -26.0%

 Advantages Fire resistant (IEC 60331) Halogen free (IEC 60754-1)

 Easier installation
 Longer length per drum Fire retardant (IEC 60332-3-22(A)) Low toxicity

 Less splicing vs. cable length Low Smoke (IEC 61034-2)

Aliphatics and aromatics
Hydrocarbon resistant
 Manpower cost reduction
 Lower transportation cost -20°C / +60°C
13
Total presentation
May 2009
 Onshore Hypron® Cables
Instrumentation cable according to BS 5308
Instrumentation cable
Lead sheath Hypron® Variation (%)
(1 pair 1mm²)
Diameter (mm) 15,4 15,2 -1,3%
Weight (kg) 806 602 -25,3%
Price (€) - - -10,0%

Instrumentation cable
Lead sheath Hypron® Variation (%)
(20 pairs 1mm²)
Diameter (mm) 45,6 44,7 -2,0%
Weight (kg) 5349 3026 -43,4%
Price (€) - - -25,0%

 Advantages
Fire resistant (IEC 60331) Halogen free (IEC 60754-1)
 Easier installation
 Longer length per drum Fire retardant (IEC 60332-3-22(A)) Low toxicity

 Less splicing vs. cable length Aliphatics and aromatics

 Manpower cost reduction
Low Smoke (IEC 61034-2)
Hydrocarbon resistant

 Lower transportation cost -20°C / +60°C

14
Total presentation
May 2009
 Cable terminations and glands for Hypron
cables

 MV terminations : same as standard cables (without lead sheath). Drain

wire in contact with Aluminium foil to be connected to earth.

 MV splicing :
 long length available should permit single length laying

 contact us for tailor made proposal

 Glands : no change as Hypron cable design to be considered for gland

selection as equivalent to a standard cable (see our leaflet Cable Gland /
Cable System )

15
May 2009
 Qualification

Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the restriction of the use of
certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment

Official Journal L 037 , 13/02/2003 P. 0019 - 0023

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1
Objectives

The purpose of this Directive is to approximate the laws of the Member States on the restrictions of the use of hazardous
substances in electrical and electronic equipment and to contribute to the protection of human health and the
environmentally sound recovery and disposal of waste electrical and electronic equipment.

Article 3
Definitions
For the purposes of this Directive, the following definitions shall apply:
(a) "electrical and electronic equipment" or "EEE" means equipment which is dependent on electric currents or electromagnetic
fields in order to work properly and equipment for the generation, transfer and measurement of such currents and
fields falling under the categories set out in Annex IA to Directive 2002/96/EC (WEEE) and designed for use with a
voltage rating not exceeding 1000 volts for alternating current and 1500 volts for direct current;

Article 4
Prevention
Member States shall ensure that, from 1 July 2006, new electrical and electronic equipment put on the market does not contain
lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent……

On the basis of a proposal from the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council shall decide, as soon as scientific
evidence is available, and in accordance with the principles on chemicals policy as laid down in the Sixth Community
Environment Action Programme, on the prohibition of other hazardous substances and the substitution thereof by
more environment-friendly alternatives which ensure at least the same level of protection for consumers.

16
May 2009
 Qualification
MANUAL

INSTRUMENT SIGNAL LINES

DEP 32.37.20.10-Gen.

July 1999
(DEP Circulars 02/01 and 83/03 have been incorporated)

Type-3, Type-4 and , Type-5 cables (PEI-MS-AL/HDPE/NC-SWA-HDPE or MICA/AL/HDPE/NC/GSWA/TH.OH)

Flame retardant cable (PEI-MS-AL/HDPE/NC-SWA-HDPE)

An extruded bedding of high density polyethylene compound meeting the requirement of ASTM D1248, type 3, class C, category 5, grade J5 shall be applied
over the collective screen.
The bedding shall be bounded to the plastic coated aluminium foil. A single layer of round galvanized steel wire armored shall be applied spirally over the
polyamide protective sheath. A high density polyethylene compound meeting the requirements of ASTM D 1248, Type 3, Class C, Category 5, Grade J5 shall be
applied over the galvanized steel wire armor (see clause 13.3.3) to the dimensions specified in Table 2.

Fire resistant cable

An extruded bedding of high density polyethylene compound meeting the requirement of ASTM D1248, type 3, class C, category 5, grade J5 shall be applied
over the collective screen.
The bedding shall be bounded to the plastic coated aluminium foil. A single layer of round galvanized steel wire armored shall be applied spirally over the
polyamide protective sheath. A thermoplastic low smoke halogen free (LSZH) shall be applied over the galvanized steel wire armor.

Shell Project No.: HP-3000-QAT Contractor name: Unit:0-0000

Contractor Project No.: 5887
Contractor Contract No.: Pl-099 Sheet: 15 of 18 PCWBS:
Contractor Doc No:
PEARL GTL PROJECT Orig. Org.: F15032-SSA-0-0000-INS-SPC-0006
QATAR – C8 ETP VSA Project Doc No: T-4.118.228 Rev.: A

T-4.118.228RevA – SPECIFICATION FOR CABLES

17
Presentation to Technip Italy – May 2008
 Onshore Hypron®
Cables
References
Oil & Gas projects requiring Hypron® technology
 SHELL :Nigeria NLNG & QATAR PEARL GTL
 BASF Antwerp
 CEPSA Cartagena
 STATOIL Norway
 ADNOC ( Gasco) ABICS
GASCO - IGD

18
May 2009
 Nexans Oil&Gas expertise towards

Fire
Performances
Technologies

19
May 2009
 Why Fire Safety?

Fire Casualties and Damages

 3% of homes experience a fire incident annually

 Over 4000 fire deaths in the USA
 Over 4400 in Europe
 Total cost of fire ~1% GDP
 70 large industrial fires alone (in UK) cost over US$ 200
million
 Property damage alone from fires in the US 2001 cost
over US$10 billion

20
May 2009
 Introduction
Fire safety & cables

What is fire ?

Air Energy source, spark

OXYGEN HEAT

Polymer degradation
Radical formation
FUEL
21
May 2009
 Introduction
Fire safety & cables

Fire fully developed

Temperature

Fire extinction
and escape
possible

Flash over
Start of fire &
Ignition propagation

Time
Role of the Role of the
fire reaction fire resistance
(no propagation) ( circuit intregrity )
22
May 2009
 Introduction
Fire safety & cables

Fire behaviour of cables

Fire Reaction Fire Resistance

Fire propagation
Flammability Usage continuity
Heat release
Smoke emission
Smoke acidity & toxicity The cable is an ACTIVE element
against fire
The cable is a PASSIVE element
during fire

23
May 2009
 Nexans expertise in
Fire safety

Product development
Materials & Designs

Fire phenomenon Standards

understanding mastering

Bringing Solutions for the end user

24
May 2009
 Mastering
Fire Reaction

25
May 2009
 Fire reaction

What is fire and fire reaction ?

26
May 2009
 Fire reaction

Oxygen

Heat
Polymer particles
in vapor phase
(fuel)

Thermal degradation
of the polymer

27
May 2009
 Fire reaction

Dilution of the
gaz vapor phase
from sheath
combustion

28
May 2009
 Fire reaction

Particle trap
Particle stabilization

29
May 2009
 Fire reaction

Particle trap
Vapor phase
absorption

30
May 2009
 Fire reaction

Barrier effect

31
May 2009
 Fire reaction

Thermal insulation

32
May 2009
 Fire reaction

Reaction to fire can be achieved by different mechanisms :

- dilution of the vapor phase
- particles /fuel traps
- barrier effect
- thermal insulation, heat decrease…etc

33
May 2009
 Fire reaction

Reaction to fire can be achieved by different mechanisms :

- dilution of the vapor phase
- particles / fuel traps
- barrier effect
- thermal insulation, heat decrease…etc

34
May 2009
 Fire reaction

Reaction to fire can be achieved by different mechanisms :

- dilution of the vapor phase
- particles / fuel traps
- barrier effect
- thermal insulation , heat decrease…etc

35
May 2009
 Fire reaction

Reaction to fire can be achieved by different mechanisms :

- dilution of the vapor phase
- particles / fuel traps
- barrier effect
- thermal insulation, heat decrease…etc

More than one mechanism may occur during fire reaction…

36
May 2009
 Fire reaction

Mastering the standards

37
May 2009
 International standards
International European Spain France Germany Italy UK China USA BELGIUM
IEC/ISO EN UNE UTE VDE CEI BS/LUL GB/T UL/IEEE/ASTM NBN EN
Flame IEC 60332-1-1
NF C 32 070 Cat. BS EN 50265
Retardant IEC 60332-1-2 EN 50265 UNE EN 50265
C2
VDE 472- 804B CEI 20-35
(BS 4066/1)
GB/T 18380-1 UL 44 NBN EN 50265
(cable) IEC 60332-1-3

Fire retardant NF C 32 070 Cat.

CEI 20-22 III NBN EN 50266
(cable) C1

EN 50266-2-1
IEC 60332-3-22 (A)
Fire Retardant EN 50266-2-2
IEC 60332-3-23(B) BS EN 50266
(bunched IEC 60332-3-24(C)
EN 50266-2-3 UNE EN 50266 NF C 32 072 VDE 472-804C CEI 20-22/3
(BS 4066/3)
GB/T 18380-3 IEEE 383 NBN C30-004 F2
cables) EN 50266-2-4
IEC 60332-3-25(D)
EN 50266-2-5

Fire Resistant FR 2
DIN 4102-12
(cable system) NBN 713 020
IEC 60331-11 UNE EN 50200 FR 1
Fire Resistant (750°C) EN 50200 UNE EN 50362 NF C 32 070 Cat. BS 6387 C1 NBN EN 50200
VDE 472- 814 CEI 20-36 GB/T 19216
(cable) IEC 60331-12 EN 50362 UNE 20-431 CR1 BS 8434-1 & 2 C2 NBN EN 50362
( 830°C) (IEC 60331) C3
ASTM E 662
Smoke density
IEC 60695-6-30 NF C 20902-1 NFPA 258
chamber ISO 5659-2 NF C 20902-2
BS 6401
ASTM D 2843
(static method) (XP2 chamber)
Smoke opacity NF X 10702
BS EN 50268
(material- IEC 61034 EN 50268 UNE EN 50268 NF C 20452 VDE 472- 816 CEI 20-38
(BS 7622-1&2)
GB/T 17651 ASTM D 2843 NBN EN 50268
cables) NF C 32073

Gases and
NF X 70100
smoke Toxicity
IEC 60754-1 EN 50267 UNE EN 50267 NF X 70101 CEI 20-37 GB/T 17650 NBN EN 50267
(material - NF C 20454
cables)
Gases and
smoke
BS EN 50267
Corrosivity IEC 60754-2 EN 50267 UNE EN 50267 NF C 20454 VDE 472-813 CEI 20-37
(BS 6425 - 1)
GB/T 17650 NES 713 NBN EN 50267
(material -
cables)
Oxygen Index ISO 4589 NF T 51071 BS 2782
Temperature
IEC 60216 VDE 304-21
Index 38
May 2009
 Reaction to fire

 Standard: IEC 60332-1, NF C 32070 test n°1 (Cat. C2), BS 4066-1, VDE 472/804 B,
EN 50265-1
 Test: Resistance to vertical flame propagation
 Objective:
 Limited flame propagation on wire or cable
 No flaming droplets
 Products concerned: Insulated wires or cables
 Test conditions:
 Insulated wire or cable sample: 600 mm
 Test sample fixed vertically in a metallic screen
 Source of heat: 1 kW propane burner inclined at 45°
 Time for the flame application: 1 to 8 min
 Depending on sample diameter

 Recommended values:
 The minimum length of uncharred surface: 50 mm under top support
 Fire test on video
39
May 2009
 Reaction to fire

 Standard: IEC 60332-3, EN 50266, BS 4066-3, VDE 472/804C, NBN 30-004 F2

 Test: Resistance to vertical fire propagation
 Objective: Limited fire propagation on vertically mounted bunched wires or cables
 Products concerned: Wires or cables, electrical or optical
 Test conditions:
 Test chamber: 4m x 2m x 1m
 Controlled air flow: 5000 l/min
 Heat source: Propane gas burner (20.5 kW)
 Oven temperature: 800°C approx.
 Bunched cables (3.5 m long) mounted spaced or not on
a steel ladder (with 500 or 800 mm)

 Maximum burnt height: Ca tegory

Fla me Volume of non
 Damaged length: 2.5 m a pplica tion meta llic ma teria l
 Video of fire test A 7.0l
40min
B 3,5l
C 1,5l
20min
D 0,5l 40
May 2009
 NO IDEAL
TESTING
METHOD

TEST METHOD
≠ SIMULATION
OF REAL FIRE

Air 5000l/min

41
May 2009
 Mastering
Fire Resistance

42
May 2009
 Mastering the
standards

Flame tests

43
May 2009
 Mastering the
standards

Oven tests

44
May 2009
 Fire resistant test

 Standard: IEC 60331-11 & 21, BS 6387

 Test: Resistance to fire alone
 Objective: Maintain circuit integrity
 Products concerned: Fire resisting cables
 Test conditions:
 Cable mounted horizontally and supported by 2 to 5 metal rings

Standard Temperature (°C) Minimal survival time

IEC 60331-11 750 90 min (+15 min without fire)

BS 6387 Cat. A 650 180 min

BS 6387 Cat. B 750 180 min
BS 6387 Cat. C 950 180 min
BS 6387 Cat. S 950 20 min

 Rated voltage: Up to 0.6 / 1 kV (electrical cables)

 Fire test on video
45
May 2009
 Fire resistant test

 Standard: BS 6387 – Cat. X, Y, Z

 Test: Resistance to fire with mechanical shocks (categories X, Y, Z)
 Objective: Maintain circuit integrity
 Products concerned: Fire resisting cables
 Test conditions:
 Cable mounted on a non combustible wall
 Flame temperature:
 Category X: 650°C
 Category Y: 750°C
 Category Z: 950°C
 Mechanical shocks: 1 shock / 30 sec
 Rated voltage: Up to 0.6 / 1 kV (electrical cables)

 Minimal survival time:

 15 min

46
May 2009
 Fire resistant test

 Standard: EN 50200
 Test: Resistance to fire with mechanical shocks
 Objective: Maintain circuit integrity
 Products concerned: Electrical power, control, data or communication
cables and optical fibre cables (Ø  20 mm)
 Test conditions:
 Cable mounted in a U form on a non combustible wall
 Flame temperature: 830°C
 Mechanical shocks: 1 shock / 5 min
 Rated voltage: Up to 0.6 / 1 kV (electrical cables)

 Minimal survival time:

 15, 30, 60, 90 or 120 min
 Categories: PH15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min

47
May 2009
 Fire resistant test

 Standard: BS 6387 Cat. W

 Test: Resistance to fire with water spray
 Objective: Maintain circuit integrity
 Products concerned: Fire resisting cables
 Test conditions:
 Cable mounted on a metal support
 Flame temperature: 650°C
 Water spray with a sprinkler
 Rated voltage: Up to 0.6 / 1 kV (electrical cables)

 Minimal survival time:

 15 min (fire) + 15 min (fire + water)
 Fire test on video

48
May 2009
 Mastering the
standards
Summary of the qualitative description of each fire resistant test
Temperature Duration Cable
Standard Fire type Shock Water
(°C) (min) length

NF C 32070 – CR1 Oven  900  90 Yes No Short

BS 8434-1 Flame < 900  30 Yes Yes Short

BS 8434-2 Flame  900  120 Yes Yes Short

BS 6387-C Flame  900  120 No No Short

BS 6387-Z Flame  900  30 Yes No Short

BS 6387-W Flame < 900  30 No Yes Short

IEC 60331 Flame < 900  90 No No Short

IEC 60331 (1000°C) Flame  900  90 No No Short

NF EN 50200 (ph90) Flame < 900  90 Yes No Short

NF EN 50200 (ph120) Flame < 900  120 Yes No Short

DIN E30 Oven < 900  30 No No Long

DIN E90 Oven  900  90 No No Long

AS/NZS 3013 Oven  900  120 No Yes Long

TEST METHOD ≠ SIMULATION OF REAL FIRE

49
May 2009
 Mastering
Fire
Consequences
Smoke ,Toxicity, Corrosivity

50
May 2009
 Fire safety
Smoke & Toxicity

Ambient air
modification
98% of victims are died by asphyxia

High risks of corrosion damage

on metallic material

51
May 2009
 Phenomenon
understanding

Smoke
Smoke due to partially burned particles :

 Too low temperature to burn

 Partial oxidation
 Too stable radicals

Will strongly impact the evacuation time

52
May 2009
 Smoke emission

Mastering the standards

Low smoke = easier evacuation and easier fire fighting

Measurement of smoke opacity

(NFC 20-902 – ASTM E662)
Dm and VOF4 values
53
May 2009
 Smoke emission

Mastering the standards

Smoke opacity measurement in
a 27m3 room, during the burning
of a cable sample (25 min),
and 40 min after burning is
completed.
The light transmittance is
measured and thanks to PVC
LSLH compounds, it remains
above 40%

Low smoke = easier evacuation and easier fire fighting

54
May 2009
 Toxicity

Toxicity ponderation IEC 60684-2 and NES 713

(scaled for CO = 1)
 Comparison of 30 min. lethal
doses for man in ppm
Phosgene 160,00
 Inverse of dose = pondera-tion
factor for toxicity index Hydrogen fluoride 40,00

We see: Hydrogen bromide 26,67

Hydrogen cyanide 26,67

HCl gas is 8 times as toxic as CO.
Phenol 16,00
HF gas is 40 times as toxic as CO.
Nitrogen oxides 16,00
 For clean fire conditions,
Sulphur dioxide 10,00
halogens, sulfur and
nitrogen containing material Acrylonitrile 10,00

should be limited. Hydrogen chloride 8,00

 Nexans LSLH material

Formaldehyde 8,00

Ammonia 5,33
has a lower toxicity
Hydrogen sulphide 5,33
index Carbon monoxide 1,00

Carbon dioxide 0,04

0,01 0,1 1 10 100 1000

55
May 2009
 Toxicity

 Quantitative analysis of different

toxic combustion gases produced
by the material

 Ponderated addition (according to

toxicity) of these quantities

 Toxicity index

Standards: NFX 70100, NES 713, IEC 60684-2

 CO : the most dangerous - Lethal at 0.3% in the air

 CO2 : not toxic but do not maintain life
 HCl : Highly corrosive and irritant , soluble in water
 HCN : very toxic and soluble in water

May 2009
 + NOx, Dioxins, aldehydes, …. 56
 Corrosivity

IEC 60754 -1 & IEC 60754 -2

 Material combustion in oven
 Combustion gases trapped in water
 Measurement of acid quantity,
determination of degree of acidity
 LSLH cables : HCl content < 10%

Low Halogen cable in fire means:

 Low HCl gas production
 Minimize hydrochloric acid formation

 Minimize corrosion on metallic

equipment
(metallic structures, conducts and pipes,
engines, electronics, … )

(Reminder : 1 kG of PVC burnt produces about 2 liter of Hydrochloric Acid of “Xi” concentration)

57
May 2009
 Bringing
Solutions
for
the end user

58
May 2009
 Fire safety
Smoke & toxicity

Nexans special PVC LSLH sheaths limit the

level of smoke and halogens in case of fire

less dense black smoke to allow

easier fire fighting

less toxicity (hydrochloric acid)

less corrosion damage on

metallic material in the vicinity
of the fire.
59
May 2009
 At the core of performance

60
May 2009
 References

61
May 2009
 Africa
• Algeria
 Sonatrach : Arzew LNG Equatorial Guinea
 Sonatrach : Skikda Refinery
Bechtel - LNG
 Sonatrach Hassi Messaoud OilField

Tunisia
• Ivory Coast
 SIR refinery- Abidjan  Hasdrubal LNG-Petrofac
 El Borma Field - SITEP
Nigeria
• Libya Daewoo/Mobil - Refinery
 Great man made river –Marubeni
 SOC-Tripoli-Mehlita Gas Pipeline. Exxon/Mobil - Refinery
NLNG Projects-Shell /KBR
• Angola
 Total Dalia Gas treatment OML 58 - Saipem

62
May 2009
 Americas
• Peru • USA
 Camisea gas development I & II Calpine
 Talara Refinery – PlusPetrol/Tecnicas.
Shell Martinas (California)
• Venezuela Shell (Gulf of Mexico)
 Contrina-PDVSA
 Sincor Petrochem- Total
• Brasil
Petrobras P 36,38,42,52,54,58,61,62
• Colombia  Comperj Petrochem
 Cerro Matoso Mining Refinery- Bechtel Pernambuco Refinery
 Cartagena Refinery-CB&I
 Pacific Rubiales Energy – Quifa field •Mexico
 Ecopetrol-Chichimene •Pemex - Danjos Refinery
• Ecuador •Bajio Gas treatment - Bechtel
 Repsol YPF Pipeline upgrade

63
May 2009
 CIS
• Georgia
• Azerbaijan  Tbilissi metering: AES
 ACG Terminal: KBR/ AIOC
 BTC pipelines : Botas
 SCP pipelines: Petrofac

• Russia
• Kazakhstan  Kharyga 1 field: Petrofac
 Sakhaline 1 & 2 gas treatment
 Kashagan O&G treatment - Agip KCO
 TCO :Parson-FluorDaniel  Prirazlomnoe Platform
 Caspian pipeline - Tefken  Gazprom : Aztrakan – Linegaz
 Tuapse Refinery - Rosneft

• Uzbekistan
• Turkmenistan
 Fergana refinery - Tefken  Turkmenbashi refinery :
FosterWheeler
 South Yoloten refinery - Petrofac

64
May 2009
 Central Asia
 Iran  Turkey
 Petrofac/Elf : Dorood  Tupras: refinery
 Technip/Olefin 9th,  LNG: Botas
 Amir Kabir, NPCC-Soroosh  BTC (Botas) – Tefken
 Pidec:Abadan Refinery
 Hyundai /Elf Balal
 South Pars 4&5: ENI
 NIGC/OIEC : 6 Compressor Stations

65
May 2009
 Middle East
• Bahrein • U.A.E.
 Alstom/Bapco  Dolphin: McDermott
• Iraq
 ADCO/Technip : NEB
 Suleimaniyah: ABB
 South Gaz Co :repairs  GASCO- ABICS : Cegelec
 Basra Export Terminal : Foster Wheeler
 ADMAOPCO – Umm Shaif Gas Injection plant
• Qatar
 QatarChemical:LG Benzene
• Yemen
 Technip/KBR: Q.Chem 1  Atuf field facilities upgrade: Total
 Shell Pearl GTL- KBR/Saipem
 YemGas –LNG Terminal – Technip
• Saudi Arabia
 Aramco-Maintenance & Repairs  Asharq Masood:Nexen Petroleum
Operations
• Kuwait
 NPC : MAA refinery & OLK2

66
May 2009
 Asia / Pacific
• Vietnam
 Dong Quat refinery – technip
• Thailand.
• Indonesia  PTTAR – EXXON Refineries upgrades
 West Natuna refinery – Conoco
 Texaco Refinery.  PPTEP – ARTHIT blocks development
 Balikpapan Expensions - TOTAL

• Australia
 DARWIN LNG - Bechtel

67
May 2009
 Europe
• Holland • France.
 Shell Refinery ( Pernis )  TOTAL Refinery & Petrochem ( Gonfreville)
 TOTAL Refinery ( Lyon )
• Spain
 CEPSA – Cartagena refinery  TOTAL Refinery ( Nantes )
 ARKEMA INEOS ( Fos / Mer )
• Germany
 TOTAL Refinery ( Leuna )
• Norway
 Statoil Refinery ( Oslo)
• UK
 Milford Haven Terminal
• Belgium
 FINA Refinery & Petrochem ( Antwerp )
 BASF Petrochem ( Antwerp )

68
May 2009
 69
May 2009
 Thank you for your attention

www.nexans.com

70
May 2009