Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HS 302
Pritee Sharma
March 2018
How Environment Emerged in
Economic Policy Making
• Functions of Environment
• Classical economists
• Neoclassical economists
• Keynesians
• Yet in absolute terms China is now world’s largest carbon dioxide emitter ahead
of USA and second largest importer of oil.
• Industrial affluence and global equity cannot be attained at the same time. So
countries can opt either for affluence with oligarchy or sufficiency with view of
equity.
Unequal Appropriation of global
resources
• Goods are distributed through international trade: 25 % of world population
appropriates 75% of world’s resources.
• More than half of bauxite, Two-thirds of world nickel, and half of world’s fossil
fuels are consumed by triad of USA, Europe and Japan.
• But the rise of China or India remains far from encompassing the entire country.
Shanghai and Shenzen in China or Mumbai and Bangalore in India are rather
locations for cross-border capital formation.
Rise of transnational consumer class
• China and India alone account for 20 percent of global consumer class even though with
considerably low average income. The consumer class represents 19 % of China’s
Population, 33% of Brazil’s population, 43% in Russia, and 89% of Western Europe. You can
figure out the growth potential in these countries.
• Three types of resource-intensive consumer goods : meat consumption, electrical
equipment and motor vehicles (exploiting energy, materials and land area).
Environmentalism and Economic Liberalization
• 1972 Stockholm Conference on Human • 1945 Bretton Woods (United Nations Monetary and
Environment UNCHE Financial Conference (US- Reagan and UK Thatcher
governments) set up IBRD, GATT and IMF
• 1980 World Conservation Strategy of IUCN
(International Union for the Conservation of • 1947 General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs
Nature) GATT…1990s (Dunkel’s draft to Parallel Regional
Trade Agreements- NAFTA, ASEAN, SAARC etc.)
• 1983 Brundtland Commission WCED (World
Commission on Environment and Development) • 1995 World Trade Organization (WTO)
• 1987 Publication of “Our Common Future” • Conflicts on role of the World Bank in developing
countries- growth and environmental degradation-
• 1992 Earth Summit at Rio-de-Janiero (2nd UN Brundtland Commission- Sustainable Development.
Conference on Env. And Development) UNCED
• Carbon Debt- (IPCC Paris 2006)- build of gases due to consumption of fossil fuels-
causing melting of glaciers, desertification, agricultural yield losses, loss of plant and
animal species.
• Global carbon Debt at this rate for 1990 alone is 980 billion Euros.
Limits to growth and dematerialization
• Kuznet’s curve
– Evidence for Environmental Kuznet’s Curve (EKC) exists mainly with respect to
emission of pollutants (Sulphur, SPM, and CO2) but not for “resource stocks” like soil
and forests or global resilience.
• World population is growing at 1.4% per year. It is as high as 7.9% in Rwanda and 8.6% in Liberia, whereas it is
less than 1% in Italy and Portugal, and declining populations in Hungary, Bulgaria and Latvia (1995-2000).
• Birthrates are crude measure of population trend, more important is (i) Number of persons in child-bearing
years and (ii) Number of children those persons are bearing.
• Stationery Population: is one in which age and gender specific fertility rates yield a birth rate that is constant
and equal to death rate, so the growth is zero.
• Level of fertility rate that is compatible with stationery population is called replacement rate.
Effects of Population Growth on
Economic Development
• Whether the increase in population positively contributes to the average citizen/average
product.
O=L*X
O is the output level, X is the output per worker, L is number of workers.
In per capita terms:
O/Population = L * X/Population
where, output per capita is product of share of population in labour force and output per
worker.
• Direct effect of population growth is on age structure. Abundance of youth creates a large
supply of people too young to work, this is called youth effect.
Country with slow population growth will have large population who has reached retirement
age, hence the situation is known as retirement effect.
Diminishing Marginal Returns
• The lack of availability of savings for younger populations restricts capital accumulation.
• A negative effect of population growth on economic growth involves presence of fixed factors (land, raw
materials etc). Here the law of diminishing marginal productivity applies.
• In the presence of fixed factor (land)successive additions of variable factor (labour) eventually declines the
marginal productivity of variable factor.
• When marginal product of labour falls below average product then per capita income will decline as the
population increases.
Technological Progress and Law of Theory of Demographic Transition
Diminishing Returns
• Notions:
– Where K is manmade capital, H is human capital, SC is Social Capital and N is natural capital,
X* is threshold level of all capital
– Strong sustainability- natural capital and manmade capital are complements and cannot be
substituted- economic growth utilizing natural capital will cause environmental degradation
• (ii) Mixed collective goods- used by many users, but the use of good is subtractable
• Most env. Good s are CPRs or open access- Tragedy of commons Hardin 1968
Cost- Benefit Analysis
• When an activity is not all-or-nothing,
comparisons between the additional benefits
and costs called marginal benefits and
marginal costs is made.
Efficiency
• Utility: measure of satisfaction
• Pareto efficiency: level of utility at which no one can be made better-off without
making anyone worse-off
• Pitfalls:
– Pareto efficiency is utilitarian- maximization of social welfare
– Pareto efficiency analysis is not useful when a policy helps some and harms others
• Production/technical efficiency
• Tragedy of Commons
– Hardin’s thesis : incremental private benefits exceed incremental private costs,
thus individual rationality becomes collective irrationality.
• Co-owners of CPRs fail to cooperate:
– When individuals feel their contribution will be miniscule, thus they easily free
ride
• Olson’s Theory
– Unless there is some coercion to make individuals act in their common
interest, the individuals will not achieve their common interests.
– Like also in perfectly competitive market