Professional Documents
Culture Documents
8 9 7/4 10 11 12 13 14
WEEK
(29/3) (5/4) (Sunday) (12/4) (19/4) (26/4) (3/5) (10/5)
LECTURE Topic 6/
(13:30 -15:30) Holiday Topic 4 Mid term Topic 4 Topic 4/5 Topic 5/6 Topic 6 Return exam
Room PQ305 paper
test
TUTORIAL Topic 3 (9:30-11:00) Topic 4 (23/4) Topic 4 (30/4) Topic 5 (7/4)
Topic 3 Cancel
(8:30 -10:30) Group B Group A Room Y304 Group A Group B Group A (8:30)
(2/4) tutorial
Room P305 (26/3) (Name: (9:00-10:00) (9:00-10:00) /Group B (9:30)
Burns to So)
Sonic test and
LABORATORY Direct RoomY305 Direct shear Uniaxial & Uniaxial &
Sample
(16:00 -18:30) shear test (Name Tai test Point load test Point load tes
preparation
(14:30 - 17:00) Group A to Zhou) Group B (9/4) Group A Group B (23/4)
Group B (26/3)
TU 804 (2/4) Group C (10/4) (16/4) Group C (24/4)
Group C (27/3)
Field Trip (Saturday (13/4, Group A: 9:00 -12:00, Group B: 1:30-4:30)
Topic 1: Index properties; Topic 2: Strength criteria; Topic 3: Shear strength;
Topic 4: Rock slope stability; Topic 5: Initial stress; Topic 6: Tunneling Engineering
CSE411 31072-4 (2012-2013) Dr. Robina H. C. Wong (TU710) Tel: 2766 6057
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
WEEK (14/2)
(31/1) (7/2) (21/2) (28/2) (7/3) (14/3) (21/3)
LECTURE
(18:30 -21.30) Topic 1 Topic 1/2 Holiday Topic 2/3 Topic 3 Topic 3/4 Topic 4
Room R506
TUTORIAL Rock
(20:30 -21.30) Classification / Topic 2
Room TU805 Topic 1
LABORATORY Sample
(18:30 -20:30) preparation index
TU 804 test/ Sonic test
8 9 9 10 11 12 13 14
WEEK
(28/3) (4/4) Sunday (7/4) (11/4) (18/4) (25/4) (2/5) (9/5)
LABORATORY Direct
Uniaxial and
(18:30 -20:30) shear
Point load test
TU 804 test
Firld Trip (Sunday 7/4) 2:00 -5:00
Topic 1: Index properties; Topic 2: Strength criteria; Topic 3: Shear strength;
Topic 4: Rock slope stability; Topic 5: Initial stress; Topic 6: Tunneling Engineering
Introduction to rock mechanics, Chapter 5. and
Appendix 5
Discontinuities
1.) Joint
2.) Fault
3.) Bedding Plane
4.) Fissures
Joints Fault
Bedding Fissures
The influence of joints
on tunnel and slope
excavation
The influence of joints
on foundation
The main content of this chapter
Strike direction:
NE040, dipSE30
Dip direction:
NE130/30
True dip & Apparent dip
True dip: is a maximum dip of the plane
Apparent dip: is a section not perpendicular to the strike,
the bed will appear at a gentler angle than the true dip.
Apparent dip
True dip
How to analysis the data of discontinuities
Stereographic projection
Stereographic Projection
Upper
hemisphere
Projection
0
plane
Lower
hemisphere
Project a line on
a horizontal
plane
Stereographic Projection
A To cut a section
F
along AA’
A`
The projection of
“P” is inside the
-P projection plane
Lower hemisphere
projection
-P
P
The projection of 20
Plunge direction
20
“–P” is out of the
P
projection plane
Upper hemisphere A Plunging line
projection
-P 0
20
P
20
A Plunging
line
-P
M
20
-P 0 P
20
Varying the inclination
P
angle of the line, the
projection points with
varied angle can be
plotted M
Stereographic Projection
F
An incline
plane
Stereographic Projection
F
Dip angle
a
b
Dip Direction c
d
A e
Point d of the great g
h S
circle represents a
B
maximum dip of the
incline plane
C H
Rotating the plane with G
D
E
varied angle, the The projection of an inclined
different projection
planes are created
plane on the horizontal
plane is a great circle
Stereographic Projection
F
The projection of a
vertical plane is a
T line
a
b
Dip Direction c
d
e
g
h S
Dip direction:
N130/30
Two types of stereonets can be used as the reference planes
for stereographic projection
Equal-area
Stereographic net
in 2° intervals
Two types of stereonets can be used as the reference planes
for stereographic projection
Equal-angle
Stereographic net
in 2° intervals
To create the great circle
and small circle for equal
angle stereographic net
The creation of equal angle stereonet
0
20
40
60
80
100
120 70
140 80
160
180
320
30
stereonet
40
310
50
300
60
290
70
280 80
270 90
100
260
110
250
240 120
230 130
220 140
210
150
200 160
190 170
180
350 10
How to create the
340
330
20
30
small circle of the
320
40
equal angle
310
50
stereonet
300
60
290
70
280 80
270 90
100
260
110
250
240 120
230 130
220 140
210
150
200 160
190 170
180
Equal-angle Stereonet is used as the reference planes
for stereographic projection
N
W E
S
Stereographic Projection
• Line projection
• Plane projection
• The intersection of two planes
• A plane determines from two apparent
dips
N090 /40
W
E
40
N090 /40
40
F 90
W
E
40
N060 /50
60
F
W
60
50 E
50
F
W
60
50 E
N060 /50
W
60
50 E
Stereographic Projection
• Line projection
• Plane projection
• The intersection of two planes
• A plane determines from two apparent
dips
N090 /50
F
50
W N
E
S 50
N090 /50
50
90
F True dip
W N
E
S 50
N130 /40 F
40
N E
W 130
S 40
N130 /40
N E
130
W 130
S 40
40
F
True dip
N E
W 130
S 40
N E
W 130
S 40
• Line projection
• Plane projection
• The intersection of two planes
• A plane determines from two apparent
dips
The intersection
of two planes
W E
S
The intersection N
of two planes
N130 /40
N090 /50
50
90
True dip
138
The intersection
of two planes
N130 /40
N090 /50
39
The angle of
intersection is
39 which is an
apparent dip
39
The angle of
intersection is
39 which is an
apparent dip
90
N138/39
For
Thethe above case,
orientation of thewhether the between
intersection formed intersection
two joints is
angle‘’
N138/39is between 40 to 50 , or 50 ?
The intersection
of two planes
N130 /40
If the
N090 /50
orientation of
the plane changes
to N110 /50
90
When the orientation of the plane shift from 90 to 110, the
angle of intersection ‘’ between two joints is : 32 ( 40),
The intersection
of two planes
N130 /40
If the orientation of
the plane changes
to N120 /50
90
90
90
When the orientation of the plan shifts from 80 to 000 , the
angle of intersection ‘’ between two joints is : 20 ( 40),
Stereographic Projection
• Line projection
• Plane projection
• The intersection of two planes
• A plane determines from two apparent
dips
A plane
determines from
two lines
A plane determines from N
two apparent dips
N060 /50
N090 /40 60
A plane determines from
two apparent dips
N060 /50
N090 /40
50
To determine the true
A plane determines from orientation from two
two apparent dips apparent dips, these
two points should be
N060 /50 rotated and line on a
same grate circle
N090 /40
40
90
To determine the true
A plane determines from orientation from two
two apparent dips apparent dip, these
two points should be
rotated to line on a
same grate circle
N090 /40
N060 /50
To determine the true
A plane determines from orientation from two
two apparent dips apparent dip, these
two points should be
rotated to line on a
same grate circle
N090 /40
N060 /50
54
N090 /40
N060 /50
Angle between
two dips is 24
The problem
for great circle
projection
A line is normal to
the plane. The
projection of this
line is a single
point. This point is
called pole.
The projection of a
pole represents that of
a plan (great circle)
The projection of a line on F
the projection plane is a Pole projection for
single point. This point is a 70 joint plane
called pole.
90 N
W 70
E
S 70
A line
90 70
perpendicular
to a plane
N
N090 /50
90 50
90
90
N
N130 /40
130
N130 /40
90 40
N130 /40
It is not convenience by using the great
circle method to determine the pole
The polar net can be used as the reference planes for polar
projection
Polar
net
90
N
W 70 20
E
20
S
A line
20
perpendicular
90
to a plane
F
How to create
The 0 angle of the pole is at
the polar net the center and the 90 angle of
the pole is at the perimeter. It is
opposite to the great circle
90
N
W 90 70 20
E
Horizontal plane
The orientation of
the pole is 180
reversed from the Pole projection for a
great circle vertical joint plane
Pole
By rotating the angle of
the same plane from 0 to projection
90, poles with different
angles can be plotted
N
W 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
W E
330
340 20 How to create
30
320
40
the polar net
310
50
300
60
290
70
280 80
90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
W
270 90
E
100
260
110
250
240 120
230 130
220 140
210
By rotating the
150
200 160 orientation and angle
190 170
180 of the plane, more
S poles can be obtained
350
N 10
330
340 20 How to create
30
320
40
the polar net
310
50
300
60
290
70
280 80
90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
W
270 90
E
100
260
110
250
240 120
230 130
220 140
210
By rotating the
150
200 160 orientation and angle
190 170
180 of the plane, more
S poles can be obtained
350
N 10
330
340 20 How to create
30
320
40
the polar net
310
50
300
60
290
70
280 80
90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
W
270 90
E
100
260
110
250
240 120
230 130
220 140
Connect all the poles 210
By rotating the
150
with the same 200 160 orientation and angle
190 170
dippiong angle, polar 180 of the plane, more
net is formed. S poles can be obtained
N
N090 /50
90 50
90
The 0 angle of
the pole is
counted from
the center. It is
N090 /50 opposite to the
great circle
50
N90
N90
90
Pole
Great circle
N
Great circle
N090 /50
N90
90
N090 /50
N90 90
Great circle
Pole
N
N130 /40
130
N130 /40
90 40
N130 /40
N130 /40
N130 /40
Pole
Great circle
N130 /40
Pole
Great circle
Determine the
intersection of two
planes by poles
Determine the
N
intersection of two
planes by poles
N090 /50
N310 /40
50
90
90
True dip
18 90
The pole of
intersection
The pole of
intersection can be
read by the polar
net
Use great circle method
Determine the The orientation of
the intersection is
intersection of two N017/18
planes by poles
N090 /50
N310 /40
N017/18
The pole of
intersection can be
read by the polar
Use great circle method net
Use polar net to
determine the pole
of intersection
N090 /50
N310 /40
Use polar net to
determine the pole
of intersection
N090 /50
N310 /40
The pole of
intersection
19
Each circle
represents 1%
of the whole
area 3
4
Six triangles Counting
represents 1%
of the whole net
area
+ 0
2
Total 351 poles 9
21
Bedding Planes
Joints
Fault
0 2 9
N
9 2 0 1 5
Plotting and 4
4
2
6 2 4
1
0
1 4 1
analysis the field 6
5 3
5
3 8 7 1 3
0
0 4
2 4 3 4 4
measurement 2 2
0
2
3
2
2 4 1 2
3
1
10
10 6
1 4 8 9
1 1 2 2 6 11
1 1 3 14
1 1 11 6
1 10
0 1 1 7 17 12
2 2 8 3
1 19
1 1 9 1
15 0
1 1 13 1
1 1 0 6 1
12
1 1 0 2 4 0
1 9
1 2 0 3 1 3 3 1
4 1 2 1 3 1 2 1
1 3 0 3 0 1 1 3 0 1
0
2
1
1 1
0
1
4
+0 0
3
3
4
3
1
2
1
1 0
9 2
Total 351 poles 1
3
4
0
1
1
5
5
8 3
2
4
3
1
1
0
0 6 22 21 0 2
3 11 7 1
2 2 3 2 3 0
1 11 7 5 16 5 2
0 3 7
3 8 1 4 6
2 7 1
2 5 4 6 7 2 6 1 6
3 0 1
1 4 8 5 4 2
6 5 13 15 1 2 1
1 5 5
8 3 2
2 3 7 5 3
9 11 7 1
Bedding Planes 6 13 4
2 5 4 4
6 3 10 16 12 6 2 7 2
0 8
Joints
4 3 4 6 8 6
4 7 6
4 0 7 8 5 5
1 6
0 1 11 4
Fault
2 6 13
1 4
2 2
5 1 0 2 9
N
Contours of pole 2 9 2 0 1 5 1
4 0
to determine the 5
4
5
1 6 2 4 4
0
1
3 8 7 1 0 4
concentration of 6 2
2
4
3
2 4 1
3
3
1
4 4
2 2 2 2 10 6
the joint sets 1 4
1
0
1
3
2 2
3
6
10
11
8 9
1 1 3 14
1 1 11 6
1 10
0 1 1 7 17 12
2 2 8 3
1 19
1 1 9 1
15 0
1 1 13 1
1 1 0 6
22/351x100% 1 1 1
0 2
9
12
4
1
0
1 2 0 3 1 3 3 1
=6.2% 1
4
3
1
0
2
3
1
0 1
3
1
1
3
2
0
1
1
0
2
1
1 1
0
1
4
+0 0
3
3
4
3
1
2
1
1 0
9 2
Total 351 poles 1
3
4
0
1
1
5
5
8 3
2
4
3
1
1
0
0 6 22 21 0 2
3 11 7 1
2 2 3 2 3 0
1 11 7 5 16 5 2
0 3 7
3 8 1 4 6
2 7 1
2 5 4 6 7 2 6 1 6
3
2% - 7 poles 1 0 4 8 5 4
1 2
6 5 13 15 1 2 1
1 5 5
3% - 10 poles 8
2 3 7 5 3 3 2
9 11 13 7 1
6 2 5 4 4 4
4% - 14 poles 6 3 0
10 16 12 6 2 8 7 2
4 3 4 6 8 6
4 6
5% - 17 poles 4 0 7 8 7 5 5
1 6
0 1 11 4
2 13
6% - 22 poles 1
6
4
2 2
5 1 0 2 9
N
Contours of pole 2 9 2 0 1 5 1
4 0
to determine the 5
4
5
1 6 2 4 4
0
1
3 8 7 1 0 4
concentration of 6 2
2
4
3
2 4 1
3
3
1
4 4
2 2 2 2 10 6
the joint sets 1 4
1
0
1
3
2 2
3
6
10
11
8 9
1 1 3 14
1 1 11 6
1 10
0 1 1 7 17 12
2 2 8 3
1 19
1 1 9 1
15 0
1 1 13 1
1 1 0 6
22/351x100% 1 1 1
0 2
9
12
4
1
0
1 2 0 3 1 3 3 1
=6.2% 1
4
3
1
0
2
3
1
0 1
3
1
1
3
2
0
1
1
0
2
1
1 1
0
1
4
+0 0
3
3
4
3
1
2
1
1 0
9 2
Total 351 poles 1
3
4
0
1
1
5
5
8 3
2
4
3
1
1
0
0 6 22 21 0 2
3 11 7 1
2 2 3 2 3 0
1 11 7 5 16 5 2
0 3 7
3 8 1 4 6
2 7 1
2 5 4 6 7 2 6 1 6
3
2% - 7 poles 1 0 4 8 5 4
1 2
6 5 13 15 1 2 1
1 5 5
3% - 10 poles 8
2 3 7 5 3 3 2
9 11 13 7 1
6 2 5 4 4 4
4% - 14 poles 6 3 0
10 16 12 6 2 8 7 2
4 3 4 6 8 6
4 6
5% - 17 poles 4 0 7 8 7 5 5
1 6
0 1 11 4
2 13
6% - 22 poles 1
6
4
2 2
5 1 0 2 9
Contours of pole
to determine the
concentration of
the joint sets C
4% - 14 poles
5% - 17 poles
6% - 22 poles
Contours of pole
to determine the
concentration of
the joint sets
Although the shape of contours
does not the same, the
concentrations of poles are
more or less the same
C
B
+
+
+ D
A
The main content of this chapter
• Collect sample
• Laboratory test:
– Triaxial compression test
– Direct shear test
Triaxial compression test
Triaxial compression test
2 c 3 tan
1 3
1 tan tan sin 2
Direct
shear test
Direct Shear Test
for rock joint
Sample preparation and testing
procedure are according to
Hencher and Richards, 1989
Sample preparation
Sample preparation
Surface Roughness
Measurement- Profile gauge
Surface Roughness
Measurement- Profile gauge
Direct Shear
Testing
Dial
gauge
Weight
Hydraulic
pump
Test Results Calculation
n = (L x P + D + W )/A’ D
L=Load Factor
P=weight
D=Static Load (level arm)
W=weight of Upper Box
W
= S/A’ P
2b
2a A’
Ub 4a U
2 2
1 U
A' ab 2ab sin ( )
2a 2a
U
U (mm)
U (mm)
3
n3
2
p
n2
1
n1
C r
n U (mm)
n1
Dilatancy
dp
n2
angle at peak
v n3
Dilatancy curve
U (mm)
U (mm)
v
U (mm)
V n
Shear Deformation
Ks: Shear stiffness
Kn: Normal stiffness
Normal Deformation
ks ks / u
n
V
kn
U (mm)
v kn n / v
U (mm)
Dilatancy Curve
Test Result – Single test
3
Normal load P:
n3
5kg to 65kg
2 (5kg increments)
n2 total 14 steps
1
n1 2a
U (mm)
U (mm) U (mm)
Shear strength determination
For rough joint:
When n is low:
=n Tan (pr + i) or =n Tan p
When n is high:
pr =C + n Tan pr
Based on:
2 c 3 ' tan
' '
1 3
1 tan tan sin 2
• Surface roughness angle measurement (Fecker
and Rengers, 1970) : Using different base lengths to
measure the roughness angle and the collected data
plotted by stereographic projection
n
i
i
i
icos2i + sini cosi
P3
i i cos2i - sini cosi
Influence of roughness on shear strength of
discontinuities and its correction
(Hencher and Richards, 1989)
i
n ni
The
Bestraw data can
fit curve will be
bedrawn
scatter duethe
after todata
the dilation occurs
being normalized
Barton’s estimated shear strength (1977)
JCS
n tan ( JRC log 10 b )
n
b : Basic Friction Angle
JCS : Joint wall compressive strength
JRC :Roughness Coefficient
Barton’s estimated shear strength
/ n
J
tan (2dn 300 ) dn 10 log 10 ( )
n n
J
n tan (20 log 10 300 )
n
J : Compressive strength of joint wall, dn: peak dilation angle
To determine the b, JRC and JCS
b
b
Once the b, JRC and JCS are determined, the shear
strength of the rock joint can be predicted using the
following equation
JCS
n tan ( JRC log 10 b )
n
To determine Log10 c = 0.00088 R+1.01
the JCS
: dry density of rock (kN/m2) R: rebound nember
To determine the JRC Method 1
To determine
the JRC
method 2 and 3
b
JRC
(JCS)
log 10
n
The shear strength of the rock joint can be predicted by
assuming several different n levels, then, can be determined
JCS
n tan ( JRC log 10 b )
n
By assume different value of
n , the can be calculated
5 MPa xx
10 MPa xx
15 MPa xx
n
The End