Marital Rape: A sex being forced emotionally, psychologically or
physically by a spouse without any consent of a victim.
Marital Rape refers to “unwanted intercourse by a man with his
wife obtained by force, threat of force, or physical violence, or when she is unable to give consent.” Battering rape: In this type of marital rape, women experience both physical and sexual violence in the relationship and in many ways. Force-only rape: In this type of marital rape, husbands use only that amount of force, as it is necessary to coerce their wives. Obsessive rape: In obsessive rape, assaults involve brutal torture and/or perverse sexual acts and are most commonly violent in form. Section 375 of Indian Penal Code (IPC) states the definition of marital rape- “Rape is considered only incase if sexual intercourse by man with his own wife is under 15 years of age” IPC do not consider Marital Rape as a Crime. Moreover, it is gender bias as no mentioning about man as a victim. Domestic Violence Act introduced in 2005 to protect women from violence including sexual abuses by their husbands. It too only provides remedy for the sexual assaults but consider marital rape as a crime. Article 21 provides Right to live with dignity which clearly not adaptable for marital crime in India. Also violates Section 375. The narrow definition has been criticized by Indian and international women’s and children organizations, who insist that including oral sex, sodomy and penetration by foreign objects within the meaning of rape would not have been inconsistent with nay constitutional provisions, natural justice or equity. Even international law now says that rape may be accepted as the “sexual penetration, not just penal penetration, but also threatening, forceful, coercive use of force against the victim, or the penetration by any object, however slight.” Article 2 of the Declaration of the Elimination of Violence against Women includes marital rape explicitly in the definition of violence against women. Emphasis on these provisions is not meant to tantalize, but to give the victim and not the criminal, the benefit of doubt. Implied consent and contract theory: The most common rationale for the marital rape exemption is Hale's notion that a marriage constitutes a contract. Women as property: A husband was no more capable of raping her wife since he could not take what he already owned. Marital unity: It means that after marriage, the wife's identity merges into the existence of her husband. This is called as Marital Unity Doctrine. Public and private divide: Marital rape cannot be considered real rape the argument being that public law cannot enter the confines of the bedroom. Physical effects: The physical effects of marital rape may include injuries to private organs, soreness, bruising, torn muscles, fatigue and vomiting. Severe harm to the vaginal and anal areas, bruising, black eyes, fatigue, vomiting, bloody noses, and knife wounds occur during the sexual violence. Gynecological effects: Vaginal stretching, pelvic pain, urinary tract infections, miscarriages, and the potential contraction of sexually transmitted diseases including HIV/AIDS. Psychological effects: Victims experience multiple assaults. They thought of experiencing constant sexual attacks by someone whom they once trusted, cared and loved. ENGLAND: Historically, under British common law, husbands were exempted from prosecution for raping their wives based on the understanding that marriage meant implied consent to sex. The turning point for marital rape law in England was on 23rd October 1991 (which until then believed that wife rape was not an offence, since there was an implied consent present). USA: Nebraska was the first state to abolish marital rape, but the turning point was the New York case of People Vs. Liberta where it was finally decided that there was no reason for differentiating between marital rape and non-marital rape. Currently all 50 states criminalize spousal rape, but remnants of the marital rape exemption are still present in many states' laws. Most states, like California, for example, define spousal rape as a separate offense than stranger rape. SOUTH KOREA : The biggest issue in the judgment of the Supreme Court of Korea was whether wives would be considered among the "women" protected under existing rape- related criminal law. "The term 'women' ['Bunyeo' in Korean] refers to all females, whether they are adults or minors, married or unmarried," the court said in its majority opinion. All thirteen judges agreed that sexual acts that took place under duress or threat of violence should be punished, including between married couples. Most of the common law countries like Australia, South Africa and Canada have followed the England system and have abolished marital rape law exemption. For instance, in Australia under Section 73(4) of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act, 1953 provides “No person shall, by reasonably of the fact that he is married to some other person, be presumed to have consented to an indecent assault by that other person. Turkey criminalized marital rape in 2005 Mauritius and Thailand did so in 2007. In Francis Corallie Muin v. Union Territory of Delhi ((1981) AIR 746 )case, the idea of right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution was highlighted. The right to live with human dignity is a standout amongst the most fundamental component of the right to life which perceives the independence of a person. The Supreme Court has held in a catena of cases that the offense of rape abuses the right to life and the right to live with human dignity of the victim of the crime of rape. The Chairman, Railway Board v. Chandrima Das (2000) 2 SCC 465 The Supreme Court has observed that rape is not merely an offence under the Indian Penal Code, but is a crime against the society as whole. In the case of State of Maharashtra v. Madhkar Narayan 1991(1) SLR SC 140; AIR 1991 SC 207 ,the Supreme Court has held that every woman is entitled to her sexual privacy and it is not open to for any and every person to violate her privacy as and whenever he wished. In the landmark case of Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan AIR 1997 SC 3011 the Supreme Court extended this right of privacy in working environments also. Further, along a similar line we can translate that there exists a right of privacy to go into a sexual relationship even inside a marriage. Subsequently by decriminalizing rape inside a marriage, the marital exception teaching damages this right of privacy of a wedded lady and is consequently is illegal. Marital rape should be recognized by Parliament as an offence under the Indian Penal Code. The punishment for marital rape should be the same as the one prescribed for rape under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. – The wife should have an option of getting a decree of divorce if the charge of marital rape is proved against her husband. Demand for divorce may be an option for the wife, but if the wife does not want to resort to divorce and wants to continue with the marriage then the marriage should be allowed to continue. Corresponding changes in the matrimonial laws should be made. The immediate need is criminalization of marital rape under the Indian Penal Code. But, mere declaration of a conduct as an offence is not enough. Something more is required to be done for sensitizing the judiciary and the police. There is also a need to educate the masses about this crime, as the real objective of criminalizing marital rape can only be achieved if the society acknowledges and challenges the prevailing myth that rape by one spouse is inconsequential. We need to understand this very fact that marriage is all about mutual understanding trust and respect for each other. It is an innocent expression for mutual love, caring, faith, equality and consent. Let’s not rot its very sacred meaning. Yes, Marital Rape- A ‘RUST’ of marriage. Issue is though in air but still we are blindfolded by the rubbish custom stereotypes. More literacy and knowledge in rural areas about their rights and realization towards this very crime. Remove such typical stereotypes like a “good wife who will be with her husband in wrong deeds also”. ......A man can force himself on his wife , ......women are mere commodity in a marriage . ...... A man can commit the greatest act of brutality on his wife. Whether women looses her right to consent after marriage and gives it to her husband? Whether the husband appropriate the decision making of the wife’s body? Whether women has different right before marriage and different right after marriage over herself? THANK YOU