This document presents two simplified calculation methods for determining the fundamental period of cable-stayed bridges: a rigidity-based method using a reverse double mass model and a Rayleigh method. The rigidity-based method models the bridge as an equivalent system and derives a frequency equation to calculate the longitudinal fundamental frequency. The Rayleigh method uses assumptions about the bridge behavior and models the kinetic and potential energies to derive a formula for the fundamental frequency. Both methods were compared to finite element models, with the rigidity-based method showing a maximum error of 3.4% and the Rayleigh method 10.79%. The document concludes the rigidity-based method provides a simple and reliable way to calculate the longitudinal fundamental period of a cable
This document presents two simplified calculation methods for determining the fundamental period of cable-stayed bridges: a rigidity-based method using a reverse double mass model and a Rayleigh method. The rigidity-based method models the bridge as an equivalent system and derives a frequency equation to calculate the longitudinal fundamental frequency. The Rayleigh method uses assumptions about the bridge behavior and models the kinetic and potential energies to derive a formula for the fundamental frequency. Both methods were compared to finite element models, with the rigidity-based method showing a maximum error of 3.4% and the Rayleigh method 10.79%. The document concludes the rigidity-based method provides a simple and reliable way to calculate the longitudinal fundamental period of a cable
This document presents two simplified calculation methods for determining the fundamental period of cable-stayed bridges: a rigidity-based method using a reverse double mass model and a Rayleigh method. The rigidity-based method models the bridge as an equivalent system and derives a frequency equation to calculate the longitudinal fundamental frequency. The Rayleigh method uses assumptions about the bridge behavior and models the kinetic and potential energies to derive a formula for the fundamental frequency. Both methods were compared to finite element models, with the rigidity-based method showing a maximum error of 3.4% and the Rayleigh method 10.79%. The document concludes the rigidity-based method provides a simple and reliable way to calculate the longitudinal fundamental period of a cable