Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
GETTING ACQUAINTED WITH THE CURRICULUM GUIDE
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
GETTING ACQUAINTED WITH THE CURRICULUM GUIDE
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
GETTING ACQUAINTED WITH THE CURRICULUM GUIDE
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
GETTING ACQUAINTED WITH THE CURRICULUM GUIDE
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
GETTING ACQUAINTED WITH THE CURRICULUM GUIDE
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
GETTING ACQUAINTED WITH THE CURRICULUM GUIDE
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
GETTING ACQUAINTED WITH THE CURRICULUM GUIDE
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
GETTING ACQUAINTED WITH THE CURRICULUM GUIDE
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
GETTING ACQUAINTED WITH THE CURRICULUM GUIDE
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
GETTING ACQUAINTED WITH THE CURRICULUM GUIDE
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
GETTING ACQUAINTED WITH THE CURRICULUM GUIDE
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
GETTING ACQUAINTED WITH THE CURRICULUM GUIDE
Quarter
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
GETTING ACQUAINTED WITH THE CURRICULUM GUIDE
Weeks (a-c)
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
GETTING ACQUAINTED WITH THE CURRICULUM GUIDE
Competency
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
CURRICULUM GUIDE FOR PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
CURRICULUM GUIDE FOR PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
CURRICULUM GUIDE FOR PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
CURRICULUM GUIDE FOR PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ACTIVITY
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
WRAP UP
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
WRAP UP
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Mass Training of Teachers in Applied
Subject (Practical Research 2)
IN
RESEARCH
Quantitative
Mixed
Workshop 1
• Form a group with 5 members. Each group
will do the following:
1. List the characteristics of quantitative
research
2. Using T-bar, list the strengths and
weaknesses of a quantitative research
(10 minutes)
Characteristics of Quantitative Data
• DATA
= numerical
• EMPHASIS
= objective, empirical observation
• OBJECTIVE
=draws exact ideas from the sample population
in order to explain and predict phenomenon
of interest
HYPOTHESES
Specifically stated at the outset and tested
SAMPLE/SAMPLING TECHNIQUES
Comes in large number of samples (representative)
Probability sampling (randomized)
DATA COLLECTION
Structured procedures
DATA ANALYSIS
Analyzed deductively
Statistical analysis
OUTCOME
= conclusive
= used to recommend a course of
action
GENERALIZATION
Findings are only generalizable to all
situations
Types of Quantitative Research
33
Descriptive Research Method
These are non-experimental designs
which aims to describe existing
conditions, opinions, attitudes,
impressions, perceptions, and
description trending.
34
1. Descriptive Survey
Involve studying populations or
universes based on the data
gathered from a sample drawn from
them. The data are often gathered
such as a questionnaire completed
by the study subjects.
35
Examples
• Public opinion Surveys
• Follow – up Studies
• Questionnaire Surveys Studies
• Test Score Analysis
36
2.Descriptive Correlational Survey
• It is designed to discover the direction
and magnitude of relationships among
variables in a particular population of
subjects.
• concerned with determining the
extent of relationship existing
between variables
• the extent of relationship is
determined by the magnitude of
coefficients 37
Examples
• Mathematics Anxiety and Academic
Performance of Selected Freshmen
Students of St. Paul University School
Year 2016 –2017.
• The relationship between IQ and
academic performance
38
3. Descriptive Evaluative
• It judges the goodness of an existing
program.
• It is directed to whether or not a
program achieved its goal.
39
3. Descriptive Evaluative
• Its purpose is to find out whether set
criterion were met or not
• to provide ongoing feedback to
people who are responsible for
carrying out a plan or a program or to
evaluate the effectiveness of the
outcome of the plan or program.
40
Example
The Implementation of Spiral Approach in
the Mathematics Curriculum
41
4. Descriptive Comparative
• It provides an explanation on the
extent of relationship between two
or more variables
• It is used to compare or contrast
representative samples from two or
more groups of subjects in relation to
certain designated variables.
42
4. Descriptive Comparative
• compares the characteristics of
groups according to some selected
variables since the main purpose is to
determine the difference without
determining the cause .
43
Examples
• Leadership aspirations” among
graduates of baccalaureate and
associate degree programs.
• Sexual maturity in asthmatic and
non-asthmatic adolescent
44
5. Trends/Projective Studies
– used to project the demands that will
be made in the future
- regression equations are formed and
the probable behavior of a variable can be
projected
45
Examples
• Forecasting sales of beverages in
Tuguegarao City
46
6. Ex – Post facto Research Studies
attempts to determine the
possible reason or cause for
existing differences in the
behavior of groups or individuals.
Same as causal comparative
design.
47
Examples
Mathematical ability of students who
have enrolled in SPUP and students
who have not been in SPUP
Frequency of students’ misbehaviors at
schools which don’t use corporal
punishment and compared that to
schools which use corporal
punishment.
48
Experimental Method
A method that uses the single-variable
approach in problem-solving, whether the
experiment is carried on in the laboratory,
classroom or field, i.e., all other factors are
kept constant except a single factor called
the variable, which is manipulated in
various ways in order to determine the
results of its functions.
49
Characteristics of True Experimental Design
1 .manipulation –refers to the presence of an
experimental variable which can be
introduced in the experiment and its
effects determined
2.control –the researcher is able to control
one or more variables
50
A.Post – test Only Control Group Design
51
Post – test Only Control Design
Control Group : R 02
Experimental Group : R X 02
52
B. Pre test - Post test Control Group Design
• In this design, subjects have been
designed randomly to the experimental or
control group
• The experimental treatment is given only
to those in the experimental group, and
the pre tests and post tests are those
measurements of the dependent
variables that are made before and after
the experimental treatment is performed.
53
B. Pre Test - Post test Control
Group Design
Control Group :R 02
Experimental Group : R 01 X 02
54
C. Solomon Four Group Design
• This design employs two experimental groups
and two control groups. Initially, the
investigator randomly assigns subjects to the
four groups.
• Those in the experimental group 1 are pre
tested and are tested again after the
treatment.
• Those in the experimental group 2 also receive
the treatment but are observed only after the
treatment, but not before. 55
C. Solomon Four Group Design
• Those in control group 1 are
observed, on occasions 1 and 2, but
they are not given the experimental
treatment.
• Those in control group 2 are
observed only on the second
occasion without previous
observation or treatment.
56
Control Group 1 :R 02
Control Group 2 : R 01 02
Experimental Group1 : R X 02
Experimental Group2 : R 01 X 02
57
Quasi – Experimental Design
58
Workshop 2
• Form a group with 5 members.
• Assign each group their respective field.
• Each group will cite an instance how
quantitative research is applied in their
respective field.
• Each group will present their output.
Kinds of Variables
Based on Causal Relationships
(2 or more variables)
• Independent Variables(manipulated variable that
cause a change to another variable)
• Dependent Variables (variables affected by
another variable)
• Confounding or Extraneous Variables ( not
included in the study but could affect the
independent variable, hence, to lessen the
impact, it must be minimized
Which is the dependent/independent variable?
SIMON SAYS!..
Research Design
This describes the research mode
whether it is a true experimental or
quasi-experimental design,
descriptive or survey research,
historical research, qualitative
research and etc.
Characteristics of a
Good Research Design
1.Objectivity
2.Reliability
3.Validity
4.Generalization
A good research paper title:
•Condenses the paper’s content
in a few words
•Captures the readers’ attention
•Differentiates the paper from
other papers of the same
subject area
Basic tips to keep in mind while
writing a title:
1] Keep it simple, brief and attractive -
Yes, Because
Background of the Study
• Description that makes reader understand
the research questions and appreciate why
they are asked.
• Cites most important study/literature -
includes most important teaching-learning
condition justifying variables under study -
briefly introduces new variables under study
Title___________
Scope and
Delimitation__________
Significance of the
study_________
Statement of the
Problem___________
Scoring rubrics
Grammar
(Sentence
Const)
Content/Subst
ance
Organization
Clarity/Precis
ion
Activity 3: Critiquing
Group 1 and 2
Group 2 and 3
Group 3 and 4
Group 4 and 5
Group 5 and 1
Activity no. 4: Looking Back
• One representative from of each
group will share their reflections on
their research experience.
Mass Training of Teachers in Applied
Subject (Practical Research 2)
Source: http://www.library.cqu.edu.au/tutorials/litreviewpages/
Literature Review
• Should give a theoretical basis for the
research and help determine the nature
of your own research
• Goes beyond the search for information
and includes the identification and
articulation of relationships bet. the
literature and your field of research
Source: http://www.library.cqu.edu.au/tutorials/litreviewpages/
Basic Purposes
• Provide a context for the research
• Justify the research
• Ensure the research hasn’t been done
before
• Show where the research fits into the
existing body of knowledge
Baker, J. D. (2016)
Specific Purposes
•Identify the main methodology
and research techniques
previously used
•Demonstrate the gap
Baker, J. D. (2016)
Levy & Ellis (2006)
“A Systematic Approach to
Conduct an Effective Literature
Review in Support of
Information Systems Research”
Research Gap?
•Distinguishes what has been
done from what needs to be
done
•Points to the significance of the
problem and need for the study
Baker, J. D. (2016)
Literature Review?
• One that creates a firm foundation for
advancing knowledge. It facilitates
theory development, closes areas
where a plethora of research exists,
and uncovers areas where research is
needed. (Webster & Watson, 2002)
Source: http://www.library.cqu.edu.au/tutorials/litreviewpages/
Literature Review
If problem/proposal is not
literature-based (i.e., VALID
PUBLICATIONS), the output
is not also literature-bound
(not PUBLISHABLE).
Activity
• Fill Out the LRM Template using the Journal
uploaded
–SAMPLE
• Send your output to
genesisjagcaoili@gmail.com
Activity
Go to http://gg.gg/ntotpr2
Access the following:
LRM Template
Journal for Review