You are on page 1of 28

Decision Making and Cultural styles

Decision - making a choice


from two or more
alternatives

Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-1
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Communication Differences in
High-and Low Context Cultures
Japan China Italy Germany

South Korea Saudi Arabia France Australia Canada USA

Vietnam New Zealand

High-Context Low-Context
Cultures Cultures
More and greater adjustments in messages Fewer and smaller adjustments in messages
Rank of receiver will probably affect message and medium Rank or receiver may or may not affect message or medium
Nonverbal communication cues may be very important Nonverbal communication cues not as important
Medium may be as important as message Message is more important than medium

Adapted from Exhibit 14.9: Communication Differences in High- and Low-Context Cultures
Exhibit 6-1
Decision-Making Process

Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-3
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Decision-Making Styles

Linear Thinking Style - a persons tendency to use external


data/facts; the habit of processing information through rational,
logical thinking.
Nonlinear Thinking Style - a persons preference for internal
sources of information; a method of processing this information with
internal insights, feelings, and hunches.

Decision-making styles
U.S.: top-level individuals decide; implementation dependent on
affected employees
Arab/Nigerian: similar to U.S., authoritative control over rank-and-
file
Japan: group orientation, consensus-based decisions, emphasis on
social stability
Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-4
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Leadership styles

U.S.: doing-oriented, reduced power distance, individual


achievement rewarded
Japan: hierarchical structure; achievements product of group
Korea and China: boss is king (autocratic, paternalistic)
Mexico: high power distance, order of inequality

Comparison of negotiation styles

U.S.: direct/confrontational, desire to win, emphasis on


short-term, max profit
Japan/China: emphasis on long-term, desire to establish
trust/build relationship
Mexico: non-confrontational, win-win
Russia: uncompromising, desire to win
Middle East: forceful/dynamic negotiator,
sincere/commitment to
Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-5
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
The Decision-Making Process (cont.)

Step 1: Identify a Problem


Problem - an obstacle that makes it difficult to
achieve a desired goal or purpose.
Every decision starts with a problem, a
discrepancy between an existing and a
desired condition
Example - Amanda is a sales manager
whose reps need new laptops

Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-6
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
The Decision-Making Process (cont.)

Step 2: Identify Decision Criteria


Decision criteria are factors that are
important (relevant) to resolving the
problem
Example - Amanda decides that memory
and storage capabilities, display quality,
battery life, warranty, and carrying weight
are the relevant criteria in her decision.

Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-7
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
The Decision-Making Process (cont.)

Step 3: Allocate Weights to the Criteria


If the relevant criteria arent equally
important, the decision maker must
weight the items in order to give them
the correct priority in the decision.
The weighted criteria for our example
are shown in Exhibit 6-2.

Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-8
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Exhibit 6-2
Important Decision Criteria

Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-9
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
The Decision-Making Process (cont.)

Step 4: Develop Alternatives


List viable alternatives that could resolve
the problem
Example - Amanda, identifies eight
laptops as possible choices. (See
Exhibit 6-3.)

Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-10
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Exhibit 6-3
Possible Alternatives

Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-11
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
The Decision-Making Process (cont.)

Step 5: Analyze Alternatives


Appraising each alternatives strengths
and weaknesses
An alternatives appraisal is based on its
ability to resolve the issues related to
the criteria and criteria weight.

Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-12
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
The Decision-Making Process (cont.)

Step 6: Select an Alternative


Choosing the best alternative
The alternative with the highest total weight is
chosen.

Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-13
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Exhibit 6-4
Evaluation of Alternatives

Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-14
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
The Decision-Making Process (cont.)

Step 7: Implement the Alternative


Putting the chosen alternative into action
- Conveying the decision to and gaining
commitment from those who will carry out the
alternative

Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-15
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
The Decision-Making Process (cont.)

Step 8: Evaluate Decision Effectiveness


The soundness of the decision is judged by its
outcomes.
How effectively was the problem resolved by
outcomes resulting from the chosen
alternatives?
If the problem was not resolved, what went
wrong?

Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-16
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Decisions Managers May Make

Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-17
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Decisions Managers May Make (cont.)

Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-18
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Making Decisions: Rationality

Rational Decision-Making - describes choices


that are logical and consistent while maximizing
value.
Assumptions of Rationality
The decision maker would be fully objective and
logical
The problem faced would be clear and unambiguous
The decision maker would have a clear and specific
goal and know all possible alternatives and
consequences and consistently select the alternative
that maximizes achieving that goal
Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-19
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Making Decisions: Bounded Rationality

Bounded Rationality - decision making thats


rational, but limited (bounded) by an individuals
ability to process information.
Satisfice - accepting solutions that are good
enough.
Escalation of commitment - an increased
commitment to a previous decision despite
evidence it may have been wrong

Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-20
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Making Decisions: The Role of Intuition

Intuitive decision-
making
Making decisions on
the basis of
experience, feelings,
and accumulated
judgment.

Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-21
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
What Is Intuition?

Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-22
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Structured Problems and Programmed
Decisions

Structured Problems - straightforward,


familiar, and easily defined problems.
Programmed decision a repetitive
decision that can be handled by a routine
approach

Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-23
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Structured Problems and Programmed
Decisions (cont.)

Procedure - a series of sequential steps used to


respond to a well-structured problem
Rule - an explicit statement that tells managers
what can or cannot be done
Policy - a guideline for making decisions

Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-24
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Unstructured Problems and
Nonprogrammed Decisions
Unstructured Problems - problems that
are new or unusual and for which
information is ambiguous or incomplete.
Nonprogrammed decisions - unique and
nonrecurring and involve custom made
solutions.

Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-25
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Exhibit 6-7
Programmed Versus
Nonprogrammed Decisions

Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-26
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Decision-Making Conditions

Certainty - a situation in which a manager can


make accurate decisions because all outcomes
are known
Risk - a situation in which the decision maker is
able to estimate the likelihood of certain
outcomes
Uncertainty - a situation in which a decision
maker has neither certainty nor reasonable
probability estimates available

Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-27
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Guidelines for Making Effective Decisions:

Understand cultural differences


Create standards for good decision
making
Know when its time to call it quits
Use an effective decision making process
Build an organization that can spot the
unexpected and quickly adapt to the
changed environment
Copyright
Copyright 2014 PearsonEducation,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-28
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

You might also like