Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TEAM
Mohamed Shoaib Khaleel
B.Prasanth
Hari Haran
CD CDO KCL 2
Where,
CDO is the zero lift drag co efficient
2
CDi is the induced drag co efficient, KC L
The constant K is the induced drag correction factor which can be easily calculated
using the formula
K = 1/(*e*AR)
Where,
e = Oswald Efficiency
AR = Aspect Ratio
CALCULATION OF CDO
CDO is the summation of all contributing components and each and every component of
the aircraft have only positive contribution to CDO
For cruise flight we neglect the CDO of high lift devices and landing gear which we
consider for take off and landing.
FUSELAGE:
The zero lift drag for the fuselage is given by
fm = 1- 0.08M1.45
CDOf = 1.069x10-3
WING, HORIZONTAL TAIL, VERTICAL TAIL
Where,
ftc = 1+ 2.7 ( t/c ) max + 100 (t/c)max
Swet = 2.0*[1+0.2(t/c)]*S
NACELLE
As it is similar to the shape of the fuselage, the same formula can be applied.
The diameter of the nacelle is about 10 % larger than diameter of the engine and
the fineness ratio is around 1.5 to 2.
CDOn = 1.069x10-4
LANDING GEAR
The zero lift drag coefficient due to landing gear comes into the picture only during take-off
and landing because during cruise they are retracted into their respective locations.
Where,
CDlg is the drag coefficient of each wheel = 0.15 ( for landing gear without fairing)
Slg is the frontal area of each wheel = diameter of tyre * radius of tyre (in meter)
CDOlg = 4.90x10-3
HIGH LIFT DEVICES
The zero lift contribution of high lift devices is also obtained during take off and landing.
It is given by
CDOthld = (Cf /C)* A*f B
Where,
Cf / C is the ratio of high lift device chord to the wing chord
f is the deflection angle corresponding to take off or landing, T/O = 20O
Landing = 40o
For cruise
For takeoff
For landing
0.17
0.16
0.15
0.14
0.13
0.12
0.11
0.1
0.09 Cl vs Cd (cruise)
Cd
Cl vs Cd (Takeoff)
0.08
Cl vs Cd (Landing)
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5
Cl
Performance
The performance aspects of the aircraft to be studied are under unaccelerated
flight conditions and accelerated flight conditions.
Under the steady level flight performance the maximum and the minimum level
of speed for each altitude is estimated.
TD=0;LW=0
1
W L ( ) V 2 S wCL
2
1
TR D ( ) V 2 S wCD
2
2W 2
V =( )
SCL
CD
TR W ( )
CL
300000
250000
200000
Thrust (N)
150000
Tr vs velocity at SL
Ta vs velocity at SL
100000
50000
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Velocity (m/s)
350000
300000
250000
200000
Thrust (N)
Tr at 5000m
Ta at 5000m
150000
100000
50000
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Velocity (m/s)
700000
600000
500000
400000
Thrust (N)
Tr at 11000m
Ta at 11000m
300000
200000
100000
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Velocity (m/s)
800000
700000
600000
500000
Thrust (N)
400000
Tr at 12000m
Ta at 12000m
300000
200000
100000
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Velocity (m/s)
900000
800000
700000
600000
500000
Thrust (N)
Tr at 13000m
400000 Ta at 13000m
300000
200000
100000
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Velocity (m/s)
STEADY CLIMB
:
:
Under steady climb performance, the following are evaluated for the aircraft
Maximum rate of climb
maximum angle of climb
maximum attainable ceiling
R / Cmax [{W / S * Z / 3* * CDO }0.5 T / W * 1 Z / 6 3 / 2 T / W L / D
1.5 2 2
max
*Z ]
= 34.368 m/s
R/C (m/s) vs Velocity
45
40
35
30
25
R/C (m/s)
15
10
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Velocity (m/s)
R/Cmax (ft/min) vs Altitude
7900
7400
6900
6400
5900
5400
4900
R/C max (ft/min)
4400
3900
R/Cmax (ft/min) vs Altitude
3400
2900
2400
Service Ceiling
1900
1400
Absolute Ceiling
900
400
-100
-500 500 1500 2500 3500 4500 5500 6500 7500 8500 9500 10500 11500 12500 13500 14500
Altitude (m)
GLIDING FLIGHT
: The following are determined for the gliding flight performance,
: Minimum descent angle
Maximum range
Equilibrium glide velocity
Rate of descent
Minimum descent angle, min
R 2 / c * (2 / S ) * CL 0.5
/ CD * Wo 0.5
W 1
0.5
C L
0.5
/ CD
max
0.75* 1/ 3* K * CDO
3 0.25
= 19.72
R = 2232 km
ENDURANCE
Endurance is the total time the aircraft can fly on a given amount of fuel.
E 1/ c * L / D * ln WTO / WLanding
L
( ) max = (1/4*K*CDO)0.5 = 14.61
D
E = 7.73 hrs
LEVEL TURN
Under level turn the following are determined,
Minimum turn radius
Velocity for minimum turn radius
Load Factor corresponding to minimum turn radius
0.5
Rmin 4* K * W / S / g * * T / W * [ 1 4* K * CDO * T / W
2
= 707.59 m
n 2 Z 1 n 2Z 1
0.5 0.5
2
/Z
g * 2Z 2 / V g * Z 2 1 / Z 0.5 *V
0.5
R V 2 / g *1/ 2Z 2
0.5
R V 2 / [ g * Z 2 1]
N R
N R
For 5000m
Vmindrag = 122.12 m/s MSTR 2.29 0.1657 3136.2
N R
For 12000m
Vmindrag = 187.93 m/s MSTR 1.28 0.042 2883.7
TAKE-OFF PERFORMANCE
R 6.96 Vstall / g
2
= 2836.076 m
cos 11 h / R = 5.06o
Sa Rsin = 250.40 m
STO S g S a = 945.51 m
R Vf / 0.2 g
2
= 2796.39 m
Sa 50 hf / tan a = 907.77 m
S f Rsin a = 146.35 m
SLA Sg Sa Sf = 1559.68 m
V 2 T V 2
n max = { [( )
W W max W
* CDO ]}
2K ( ) 2K ( )
S S
n= 1
2
C
* V 2 * L max
W
( )
S
The graph is plotted using the tabulated values with velocity along X-axis and along Y axis. The point of
intersection of the two curves gives the positive limit load factor.
To find the maximum velocity the aircraft can travel, the thrust required and the thrust available curves are
plotted with velocity and the maximum velocity is found.
STABILITY
Stability in the aircraft design is divided into two major categories
Static stability
Dynamic Stability
Static stability means when the aircraft is disturbed from the original flight path, forces will
be activated in such a way the aircraft returns to its original position.
Positive static Stability
Neutral static Stability
Negative static stability
Dynamic stability means the way in which the restorative forces act on the body with
respect to time. In other ways it is the property which dampens the oscillations set up by
the statically stable aircraft.
The assumptions in the Analysis of
Aircraft Stability and Control
The flow is incompressible
Airframe is rigid i.e the distortion or deformation of airframe due to
aerodynamic forces and loads not considered.
The relationships between various parameters are generally linear which
implies the disturbances are assumed to be very small
The longitudinal motion is independent of lateral and directional forces.
Under Static stability of the Aircraft we have three different categories
Longitudinal Static stability
Lateral Static stability
Directional Stability.
LONGITUDINAL STABILITY:
C=
l l
0.5* *V 2 * S w * b
=1.685
Steps involved in determining stick fixed
longitudinal stability of the aircraft
at and aw are the slope of the lift curve found from the
equation
a= at and aw are the slope of the lift curve found from the
equation
CL
a= CL
1
* AR
Types of Stability:
Lateral stability refers to the ability of the aircraft to generate the rolling moment to stabilize
the rolling effect.
The criteria for lateral stability is must be greater than zero.
Directional stability:
Stability about the aircrafts vertical axis i.e. the sideways moment is known as directional stability or
weather cock stability.
The criteria for directional stability is must be positive for directional stability.
C L
must be evaluated which is equivalent to since CL is
proportional to .
C m X cg X ac C m at *Vht *ht
C L
= + + (1- )
C C L aw
= 0.2136
Xcg can be found out from the balance diagram (from the
phase I) and Xac is assumed to be around 0.25.
2
C m = K f *W f * L f
= 0.2136
C L CL
S w *( )W * C
Is evaluated from the formulae given below
CL = 0.046
= 2*( )w
* AR
For different values for e, C is
mo evaluated as follows
e (Deg) Cm
-25 0.060042
-20 0.0129
-15 0.0432
-10 0.1643
-5 0.05286
0 0.09063
Static Margin for different cases
Full payload+ Full fuel 0.06042
C m = at *Vht *ht * o
e
=(0.0936)(1.1)(0.25)
= - 0.02574 rad-1
Stick force
Ch
C W C
Fs = *( A h * t ) K *( ) * e *( m ) stickfree
t S Cm CL
e
Where,
K = G * Se * Ce *;htG = 1.5, ht
= 0.90,
Ce
=0.20
C
K= - 50.929
From the graph the trim velocity, = 270 m/s.
The slope of the curve at this point is the measure of stick force to
produce a change in speed.
Steps involved in determining the
Directional Stability of the aircraft: =-
Cn
(
) wing = 0.00006*() 0.5
Where, is the sweep back angle in
degree
=0.0003
Contribution of fuselage and nacelle to Directional Stability
(all units in SI):
( Cn ) = 0.96* K Sf Lf h1 w
fuselage & nacelle ( )*( )*( )*[( )*( 2 )]0.5
57.3 Sw b h2 w1
= 0.003798 deg-1
Cn
( )verticaltail
= av *Vvt *vt *(1 )
Where,
Vvt
Sv * lv
=0.9 vt
Sw * b
= - 0.00195
Cn Cn Cn Cn
( ) = ( )verticaltail + ( ) fuselage&nacelle + (
) wing
= - 0.003464 + 0.003583 - 0.00465
= - 0.0015
Steps involved for determining Lateral
Stability of Aircraft:
Contribution of the wing fuselage interface to lateral stability
=
Cl Sv Zv
av *( ) *( ) *vt
( )verticaltail
= - 0.00495
Sw b
Contribution of wing interference on vertical tail to lateral stability
Cl = 0.00016 ( Low wing)
( ) wingonverticaltail
Contribution of wing to lateral Stability
Cl = 0.002(^) + (
Cl
)tip shape+ (
Cl
) sweepback
( ) wing
Cl Cn Cl
( ) sweepback =0.5* ( ) wing+ ( )tip shape =0.0068392
Cl
)wingfuselage + ( Cl ) Cl
+ ( Cl )wing
Cl
( ) = ( +( ) wingonverticaltail
verticaltail
= 0.0024892 deg-1
Lateral Control:
The common way of determining the lateral control
effectiveness is by the use of the non dimensional parameter .
The lateral control deflection is the measure of lateral
control power available.
Aileron Rolling power relation is given by:
=
Pb 2*(1 )( K 23 K13 ) 3 ( K 2 2 K12 )
2* a *[ ]
2V 3
Pb
= 0.006306 deg-1
2V
Structural Design
WING DESIGN
The first step towards the Structural Design is to find the lift Distribution of the wing.
The lift distribution of the wing is best approximated using Schrenks Curve which is
the average of the Elliptical Distribution of the lift over the wing and the Trapezoidal
Distribution of the lift over the wing. So the elliptical and the trapezoidal distribution
of the lift over the wing should be approximated.
3. Using the equation of ellipse the curve is plotted for different values of y
Ly =(4 W TO/ *b)/ [ 1- (2y/b)2]0.5
Lift Distribution vs half span (elliptical)
w y = [13298.49 ( 1 8.19x10-3y2) 0.5]
14000
12000
10000
8000
Lift (N)
6000
4000
2000
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Span (m)
TRAPEZOIDAL DISTRIBUTION
3.The lift produced by any section of wing is directly proportional to the chord of the
wing.
w 2 / w 1 = c t / c r = ( taper ratio)
w 1 = 2W TO / b (1+w 2 = 2W TO / b (1+ )
w y = 17470.68 [ 1- 0.072y]
Lift Distribution vs half span (tapezoidal)
20000
18000
16000
14000
12000
Lift (N)
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Span (m)
Schrenk's lift cuve
w y = {[13298.49 ( 1 8.19x10-3y2) 0.5]+ [17470.68 (1- 0.072y)]}
18000
16000
14000
12000
10000
Lift (N)
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Span (m)
20000
18000
16000
14000
12000
Lift (N)
10000 Ly elliptical
Ly trapezoidal
Schrenk's curve
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Span (m)
SHEAR FORCE DIAGRAM
The different loads acting on the wing are identified and their distribution is evaluated
1.The loads whose distribution is to be known are the lift load, the wing structural weight and the fuel
weight. The point loads acting on the wing are engine weight and the landing gear and their locations are
identified.
2.The lift load distribution is obtained from the Schrenks curve, the fuel and the wing structural weight
is assumed to have trapezoidal distribution and the load acting depends upon the thickness and the chord
of the section of the wing.
3.The shear force diagram is obtained integrating the loads acting on the wing along its half span taking
into account the point loads at their positions with the tip of the wing as origin.
Fuel weight Distribution:
( 1)
C Croot [1 y]
b/2
W1 C1t1 1
=
* lengthoffuel tan k *(W1 W2 ) Wwing
W2 C2t2 2
The fuel weight distribution is given by
w F = 12827.03 1225.69X
Structural weight Distribution:
Structural weight varies linearly from the root to tip of the wing and the
intensity of the load is proportional to the chord of the section.
W1 C1t1 = 1
* semispan *(W1 W2 ) Wwing
W2 C2t2 2
where point 1 and 2 represents the Root and the tip of the wing
w w = 785.93 31.44x
Weight Distribution
16000
15000
14000
13000
12000
11000
10000
9000
Load (N)
8000
Schrenk's
7000 Fuel
Strutural
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Span (m)
Shear Force Distibution
3000000
2000000
Shear force (N)
SFD
1000000
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Span (m)