1. How would you describe the narrator of the story?
2. How was Petey Bellows described in the story? How about Polly? Do you think they were really as dumb as they were described? 3. What was narrators reason for wanting Polly? 4. What fallacies did the narrator committed that Polly has mentioned? 5. If you were Polly, would you fall for the narrator or for Petey? 6. Do you agree that love is a fallacy? Why or why not? Activity Summarize the story using the linear plot. A.Introduction B. Rising action C. Climax D.Falling action E. Denouement Double Matching Type _,_1. an argument based on unqualified generalization _,_2. an argument based on few and not enough instances _,_3. an argument based on appeal to emotion _,_4. an argument based on destroying ones reputation _,_5. an argument which is not really supported by its proof COLUMN A A. Hasty generalization B. Ad misericordiam C. Poisoning the well D. Hypothesis contrary to the fact E. Dicto simpliciter COLUMN B Double Matching Type COLUMN A COLUMN B _,_1. an argument S. We are well matched on based on unqualified A. Hasty basis of five dates. generalization generalization T. Say that youll go steady _,_2. an argument B. Ad with me, for if you will not my based on few and not misericordiam life will be meaningless. I will enough instances C. Poisoning the languish. I will not eat my _,_3. an argument well meals based on appeal to D. Hypothesis U. Youve learned your emotion contrary to fallacies because of so you _,_4. an argument the fact owe me something, dont based on destroying E. Dicto you? ones reputation simpliciter V. The things you learn in _,_5. an argument school dont have to do which is not really anything with life supported by its W. Five dates is plenty. After proof all, you dont have to a whole cake to know that it is good What is a logical fallacies? Fallacies are errors or mistakes of reasoning. The word fallacy may derive from the Latin word fallere meaning, to deceive, to trip, to lead into error or to trick. The word may also derive from the Greek phelos, meaning deceitful. What is a logical fallacies? 2 Kinds of Fallacies 1. Formal Fallacies- are errors in reasoning due solely to an incorrect form or structure of an argument, thus correspond to the invalid deductive arguments 2. Informal Fallacies- also known as material fallacies, are errors in reasoning due solely to an anomaly or defect in the content (or in the meaning of the words or sentences) of an argument Why study logical fallacies? It is important to develop logical fallacy detection skills in your own writing, as well as others.
Think of this as intellectual kung-fu: the art of
intellectual self defense. (Logical Fallacies Handlist) Informal Fallacies A. Fallacies of ambiguity- referring to fallacies in which the error in reasoning is brought about by the occurrence of ambiguous terms whose meanings are confused in an argument B. Fallacies of relevance- referring to fallacies in which the error in reasoning is brought about by the irrelevance of the premise or premises to the conclusion of an argument. C. Fallacies of presumption- -referring to fallacies in which the error in reasoning is brought about by the occurrence of complex or loaded expressions whose assumptions are questionable or have not yet been proven to be true A. Fallacies of ambiguity 1. Equivocation- is committed when several meanings of a word or phrase become confused in the context of one argument (ex. All laws should be respected and obeyed. The of gravity is a law. Therefore, the law of gravity should be respected.) A. Fallacies of ambiguity 2. Composition- is committed when one reasons from the qualities of the parts of a whole to the qualities of the whole itself (ex. Every part of this machine is light in weight. Therefore, the whole machine is light in weight.) A. Fallacies of ambiguity 3. Division- which is the reverse of composition, is committed when one reasons from the qualities of a whole to the qualities of the parts of the whole (ex. Filipino cultural minorities are disappearing. Juan is a Filipino cultural minority. Therefore, Juan is disappearing.) B. Fallacy of relevance 1. Argument from ignorance (ad ignorantiam)- is committed when it is argued that a proposition is true simply on the basis that it has not been proven false, or that it is false because it has not been proven true (ex. Mental telepathy must be accepted as a fact; for nobody has proven that it is impossible. B. Fallacy of relevance 2. Appeal to inappropriate authority- is committed when one appeals to an authority whose field of expertise does not include the nature of the conclusion being established (ex. We should vote for this candidate for he is endorsed by our favorite basketball player.) B. Fallacy of relevance 3. Argument against the person (ad hominem)- is committed when one evaluates an argument by means of citing something about the person who asserts the argument (ex. She cannot be a good president for she comes from a broken family.) B. Fallacy of relevance 4. Appeal to pity (ad misericordiam)- is committed when one appeals to pity to cause the acceptance of a conclusion (ex. The man certainly deserves a promotion, for he can hardly feed his starving family. B. Fallacy of relevance 5. Appeal to popular will (ad populum)- is committed when one appeals to pity to cause the acceptance of a conclusion(ex. We should drink this brand of beer, for it is the regular drink of successful men after a hard days work.) B. Fallacy of relevance 6. Appeal to force (ad baculum)- is committed when one appeals to force, often with subtlety, to cause the acceptance of some conclusion (ex. It is your duty to pledge allegiance to this constitution, for otherwise rebellion charges will be filed against you.) C. Fallacies of presumption 1. Complex question- is committed when one asks a question that contains unproved assumptions. A fallacy is committed when one argues that these assumptions are true just because an answer is given to a complex question (ex. A lawyer who wants to establish that person A is beating his child asks this question: Have you stopped beating your child?) C. Fallacies of presumption 2. False cause (post hoc/post hoc, ergo propter hoc)- is committed when one attributes a wrong cause to something, which is often due to a mere temporal succession of two events (ex. Edgar Allan Poes literary genius must have been caused by drinking liquor, for it is said that before he would write he would first drink some liquor.) C. Fallacies of presumption 3. Begging the question (Petitio principii)- is committed when reasoning is circular in that the conclusion is already assumed in the premises (ex The soul is immortal, for it never dies.) C. Fallacies of presumption 4. Fallacy of accident (inverse hasty generalization)- is committed when one applies a general rule to individual cases, which, because of their special or accidental nature the general rule does not properly apply. (ex. Running is good for the heart. Therefore, running will be good for Pedro who is suffering from a heart disease. C. Fallacies of presumption 5. Hasty Generalization (converse accident)- is committed when one makes a generalization from a special or accidental case, or simply from insufficient number of cases (ex. While running, Jose had a heart attack. Therefore, running is bad for the heart. Example of ad populum
We should drink this brand of
beer for this is the regular drink of successful men. Example of appeal to authority
We should abolish death penalty.
Many respected people, such as Mr. Guy Handsome, has publicly stated his opposition to it. Example of appeal to ignorance
People have been trying for years
to prove that God exist. But no one has yet been able to prove it. Therefore, God does not exist Examples of complex question So are you still cheating on your tests? Whether a yes or no answer is given, it still leads to the listener confirming something that is probably not true. Two questions are really being asked. Have you ever cheated on tests? and If you cheated in the past, have you stopped? Examples of begging questions McDonalds cheeseburgers are bad for you. Just look at how greasy they are! The premise left out here could be framed as Greasy cheeseburgers are bad for you. Smirnoff makes the best drinks because theyre so tasty. They taste good because they can afford to bottle them with the best flavors added in. Because its such a wealthy drink distributor, Smirnoff has to be the best drink makers around! Examples of hasty generalization
revise Example of accident
Running is good for the heart.
Running is good for Pedro who is suffering from a heart disease C. Fallacies of presumption 6. Complex question -is committed when one ask a question that contains unproved assumptions. -a fallacy is committed when one argues that these assumptions are true just because an answer is given to a complex question Example- Have you stopped beating the child Examples of equivocation Bad people should be put in jail. Im a bad salesman, therefore I should also be put in jail. The word bad is used differently in the premise than it is in the conclusion, so a fallacy is committed here. You told me the crate over there was light, but I cant see anything inside it. Fallacy of relevance 1. Argument against the person (ad hominem) -One person makes an argument, and the other person replies with a criticism but not one made about the argument, but about the person himself. Example of composition
Each ingredient in this recipe tastes
bad. Therefore, the finished dish will also taste bad. Each atom in this chalkboard is invisible. It follows that the chalkboard is invisible. Examples of division This pitcher of tea tastes sweet. Therefore, the tea leaves in it must taste sweet. That painting on the wall appears brown. Therefore, all the paint on it must be brown. I have so much work to do, I wont even try to start it. Examples of ad hominem John says I should quit smoking because its bad for me. But hes practically an alcoholic, so who is he to give me advice about my health? You just want me to break up with my girlfriend so you can ask her out! Examples of ad baculum Either agree that Im king of the world or Ill beat you up! Give me $200 or Ill tell your wife youre cheating on her. Examples of ad mesiricordiam Dont give me a ticket, officer. My wife has cancer and my aunt just had a stroke! I know the exam is graded based on performance, but you should give me an A. My cat has been sick, my car broke down, and I have been sick, so it was really hard for me to study.