Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Iwan Dwiprahasto
CE&BU
Fakultas Kedokteran UGM
(a) patients who underwent presurgical US and in
(b) patients who underwent appendectomy without prior US.
Puig et al, Radiology January 2003
Natural History of Disease
A B C D E F
A. Biologic onset of the condition
B. Pathologic evidence of disease detectable by screening
C. Signs and symptoms of disease
D. Health care sought
E. Diagnosis of disease
F. Treatment of disease
Issues in Screening
Definition
Purpose of screening
Primary prevention
Secondary prevention
Mahal
Invasif
Spesialistik
Interpretasi sulit
Test
canggih Hasil test negatif
Aksesibilitas rendah
Diagnostic/screening
Diagnostic/screening Misleading
Accurate
GOLD STANDARD
Pneumonia
Pneumonia
No
Pneumonia
Pneumonia
Respiratory No
rate Pneumonia
No
Pneumonia
FOTO RONTGEN
No
Pneumonia Pneumonia
Pneumonia a b
RESPIRA
SI No
Pneumonia
c d
Sensitivit Specificit
y= y=
a / (a+c) d / (b+d)
DEFINISI
Sensitivity:
Spesificity
No
Pneumonia Pneumonia
+ PV =
Pneumonia a b a/ (a+b)
RESP
- PV =
I
RASI
No
Pneumonia
c d d/
(c+d)
DEFINISI
+ 27 35 62
Dx
klinis
- 10 77 87
37 112 149
No
Pneumonia Pneumonia
Pneumonia a b
RESPIRA
SI No
Pneumonia
c d
Accuracy = (a+d) /
N
Prevalence = (a+c) / N
FOTO RONTGEN
No
Pneumonia Pneumonia
Pneumonia a b
RESPIRA
SI No
Pneumonia
c d
a/a + c c/a + c
LR + = ---------- LR - = ----------
b/b + d d/b + d
Likelihood ratio positif:
+ 27 35 62
Dx
klinis
- 10 77 87
37 112 149
27/37 10/37
LR+ = --------- = 2,3 LR- = ------- = 0,39
35/112 77/112
MAKNA LIKELIHOOD RATIO
Apa arti?
history or autopsy or
physical examination, biopsy
a blood test
BLINDING
Is this evidence about a diagnostic test valid?
1. Was there an independent, blind
comparison with a reference (gold)
standard of diagnosis?
2. Was the diagnostic test evaluated in
an appropriate spectrum of patients
(like those in whom we would use it
in practice)?
3. Was the reference standard applied
regardless of the diagnostic test
result?
4. Was the test (or cluster of tests)
validated in a second, independent
group of patients?
36 Ca colon/rectum 35
lanjut positif
Carcino Embryonic
Antigen (CEA) Ca colon/rectum
Derajat ringan
Akurasi
buruk
Ca gastrointes-
tinal lain
high
medium
Disease (+)
Study Patiens
Disease (-)
Disease (+)
Independent
Group
Disease (-)
1. Is the dx test available, affordable,
accurate, and precise in our setting?
Tersedia
Terjangkau
Akurasi
EXPERT????
Presisi
2. Can we generate a clinically sensible estimate of our
patients pre-test probability?
From personal experience, prevalence statistics,
practice databases, or primary studies
pre-test probability
(apa yang kita pikirkan/duga sebelum test)
post-test probability
(apa yang kita pikirkan/duga setelah test)
Widal Typhoid???