Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ghazala Yasmeen
1
Grounded theory methodology
2
Origins
3
Theoretical Sampling & Saturation
Theoretical sampling is concerned to collection of data and
its direction to gathering further samples which moves to
develop a theory (S&C, 1990; G&S, 1967; Douglas, 2003).
6
Sources of Data
All is Data
7
Grounded Theory Approaches
8
Classical/Glasserian Grounded theory
10
Constructivist GT Approach
11
Difference b/w Classical, Straussian
& Constructivist GT approach
Glaserian/Classical Straussian Approach Constructivist/Charmaz
Grounded Theory of Grounded Theory Grounded Theory
Paradigm Positivism or Post- Interpretive and more Constructivism &
atic positivism associated with Symbolic Interactionism
Difference Realist ontology/ Symbolic Interactionism approach between
s Critical realest ontology Relativist ontology positivist and postmodern
Objectivist epistemology Subjective epistemology Relativist ontology
Subjectivist epistemology
Formulati No research question in Enter in research field Remain focused on some
on of starting of research with some research questions of inquiry
Research procedure questions
Questions Emerging theory, with Forcing the theory, with
neutral questions structured questions
Use of No use of literature in No hard and fast rule. Like Straussian
Literature beginning of research Literature can be used approach, begin with the
and avoid forcing the at any phase of review of literature but
data research with the difference of time
Beginning with general Having a general idea of and approach
wonderment (an empty where to begin Compile a lit review
12
Analysis Coding is less rigorous, a Coding is more rigorous Emphasis on
procedure constant comparison of and defined by technique. intensive interviews
incident to incident, with The nature of making Use three types of
neutral questions and comparisons varies with coding: open coding,
categories and properties the coding technique. focused coding and
evolving. Take care not to Labels are care-fully theoretical coding
over- conceptualize, crafted at the time. Codes
identify key points are derived from micro-
Two coding phases or analysis which consists of
types, simple (fracture the analysis data word-by-
data then conceptually word
group it) and substantive Three types of coding,
(open or selective, to open, axial and selective
produce categories and
properties)
Credibility, The credibility of the The credibility of the Two criteria
Verification theory, or verification, is theory comes from the Credibility supported
& Procedure derived from its grounding rigor of the method by empirical data
of Validity in the data Two sets of criteria Originality
Focus on four criteria Research process
Fit Empirical grounding of
Relevance finding
Work
Modifiability
13
Theory Create a descriptive Conceptual description It create a explanatory
theory (description of theory that should
Development of a situations) emerge from the data
conceptual theory The theory is interpreted with the active
The theory is grounded by an observer engagement of
in the data Data is structured to researcher and
Data reveals the theory reveal the theory participants. Result can
be presented as a story
Theoretical Theoretical sensitivity Theoretical sensitivity Theoretical sensitivity
sensitivity comes from immersion comes from methods comes from
in the data and Tools interpretation, intuition
and participants
Basic A basic social process Basic social processes Should focus on
social should be identified need not be identified meaning, action and
processes process in social context
Role of The researcher is The researcher is active Researcher as a co-
Researche passive, exhibiting producer of data jointly
r disciplined restraint with participants
Regarded by some as Regarded by some as a Regarded by some as a
the only true GTM form of qualitative data form of qualitative data
analysis (QDA) analysis (QDA)
14
Data Analysis in Straussian GTM
15
Research Objectives & Questions
Research Objectives
Research Questions
18
Contextual Positioning of Extant Data
Researcher and participant interaction is basic difference
between extant or elicited source or data collection and data
generation.
While generating data through elicited source, a researcher can
develop a deep understanding about the positioning of data for
analysis.
Positioning and context of data is concerned with asking the
questions concerned to who, what, when, where, why and how.
In contrast, researcher involved in data collection through extant
source is deprived of context of data that is needed to position
extant data for analysis.
To bridge this gape it is need to collect extant data through
systematic and reflexive way of collecting data source with its
associated information to position data for analysis rather than
simple process of collecting articles (Ralph, Birks & Chapman,
2014). 19
Questions for establishing Contextual Positioning of Extant Data
Purpose Questions
Who To Identify Who participated in conceiving, supporting, shaping, writing,
editing, and publishing the text?
Who was its production intended to benefit?
What To Define What stated or assumed purposes does it serve?
What specific value does this text bring to the current study?
What are the parameters of the information?
When To Chronicle When was the document conceived, produced, updated?
What is the documents intended lifespan?
To what extent are the issues that influenced and informed the
production of this document relevant to the temporal context of
the current study?
Where To Locate Where was the document produced?
Where is the document intended for use?
Where is the document positioned in respect of sociological
context?
Why To Rationalize Why would the text be used?
Why, if at all, is the text unique, reliable, and consistent?
How To Explain How (if at all) do the authors of the text propose it be used?
How is the text written?
How is the document achieving its purpose?
20
Sequential series of stages
21
Open Coding
Open coding is an interpretive process which is
involved with breaking down data to examine closely
and deeply to extract concepts and compare similarities
and differences (Corbin & Strauss, 1990; Strauss &
Corbin, 1998).
22
Category Sub Key Concepts
Categories
Value Value proposal; offering value; proposal acceptance or
Proposition rejection: perceived value; expected value
25
Look for
Intervening conditions - that shape,
facilitate or constrain the strategies that take
place within a specific context.
Action/Interaction - strategies devised to
manage, handle, carry out, respond to a
phenomenon under a set of perceived
conditions
Consequences - outcomes or results of
action or interaction, result from the
strategies
26
An Example of The Paradigm Model
Paradigm Key Concepts Sub Categories
Causal Conditions Need for service Dependency, specialized knowledge
exchange and skills, rare and differentiated
operant resources,
Phenomenon Agency service relation
Contextual Service Context Perception of greater value, service
Conditions contract, value proposition, service
interaction
Intervening Institutions and Value & belief systems,
Conditions institutional Institutional logics
arrangements,
Action/ Interaction Service system practices Resource integration practices,
Strategies and processes non-pecuniary / non-financial incentives,
service governance mechanism
28
Propositions
1. Need for service exchange (reciprocal exchange of operant resources)
leads service actors (employers and employees) to establish service
contract and service relation