Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Date: 13/06/2015
Outline
1 Abstract
2 Introduction about strategic alliances
3 Renault-Nissan alliance
Major Cultural Differences and challenges
4
between Renault and Nissan
5 The success of Renault-Nissan alliance
6 Conclusion
Abstract
1 Individualism Vs Collectivism
Nissan Renault
Based on the concept of collectivism. The more individualistic culture
group as the most efficient instrument,
decisions are taken by consensus
The new reward system that assesses managers according to their results and
promotes them based on objectives achievement, this change in Nissan aims to
increase individualism in a way that facilitates finding new talents.
decision making process changed in a way that allows individuals to take decisions
quickly instead of taking decisions based on group consensus.
The new management system in Nissan now encourages individual initiatives and
advancements in contrary to the former system
Major Cultural Differences and challenges between
Renault and Nissan
2 Power Distance
Nissan Renault
Strong, lower than Renault, hierarchy is Strong, hierarchy is strong
strong.
What determines the hierarchy is the
time spent in the company.
Traditions forbid the commandment of
managers by someone younger
new system of promotion that is based on performance was implemented.
To minimize the high risks of conflicts Carlos Ghosn had established a double
hierarchy system.
Major Cultural Differences and challenges between
Renault and Nissan
3 Masculinity Vs Femininity
Nissan Renault
Japanese society is one of the most French culture tends to support equality
masculine societies in the world between males and females
Renault is sending women managers to Nissan as part of their collaboration
Major Cultural Differences and challenges between
Renault and Nissan
4 Language
Nissan Renault
Japanese language French language
English is the official language, higher risks of misunderstanding in communication
Major Cultural Differences and challenges between
Renault and Nissan
5 Uncertainty Avoidance
Nissan Renault
Being more conservative Taking risks
long term planning
Board members reduced from 37 to 10
Decision making process now dont need consensus
Major Cultural Differences and challenges between
Renault and Nissan
6 Time Perception
Nissan Renault
cyclical perception of time linear perception of time, Time is money
More long term oriented More short term oriented
Time orientation in Nissan had to be changed, Carlos Ghosn set the survival plan to
make Nissan able to recover as soon as possible by focus on regaining short term
profit
Major Cultural Differences and challenges between
Renault and Nissan
7 Truth Vs Virtue
Nissan Renault
make compromises and choose the best take decisions fast and pursue its logic till
in the different choices which is time the end
consuming
The new promotion system that is based on performance encourage taking decisions
fast
Major Cultural Differences and challenges between
Renault and Nissan
8 Decision-making
Nissan Renault
Making decisions take much longer time They make decisions quickly
because general consensus
Number of Nissan's board members reduced from 37 before the alliance with Renault
to 10
Major Cultural Differences and challenges between
Renault and Nissan
9 Enterprise Loyalty
Nissan Renault
employees are very loyal because of the Employees are be less loyal because of
concept of lifetime employment the individualistic culture
Carlos Ghosn eliminates this principle lifetime employment mentioning that
Japanese cannot stuck with this old principle, and they had to adapt to current
management systems in order to keep their powerful in the auto industry
The success of Renault-Nissan strategic alliance
The strategic alliance between Renault and Nissan has created a successful
giant car producer in the global Auto Industry market, ranked No. 4
8.3 million cars of sales in 2013, about 10% of cars manufactured all over the
world, expectation for 2016 is to sell 10 million cars
Constant synergy between the two companies and common goal vision
After 15 years of the alliance, the two companies still seeking more
convergence (strategic alliance is a constant process of re-shaping and good
practicing )
Conclusion
Questions