COURSE PLAN

TEACHER NAME | COURSE NUMBER

Content
Course Details
Course Structure
Course Description/Rationale and Prerequisites
Course Outcomes
COs POs Mapping and Summation Matrix
Assessment Methods & Evaluation Schemes and Mapping with
COs
Lecture Plan
Active Learning Techniques Plan
Course Exit Survey
Content
Courses Past Results: last 3 years
CO-Attainment and Analysis (Gap Analysis), (Remarks,
Recommendations & Resolutions)
Question Papers & Model Answers (can be attached at
the end of course plan)
Course Details

Class
Semester
Academic Year, Curriculum Year
Course Title, Course Code
Maximum Marks/Credits
Dept./Program
Faculty Name
Course Structure

Level (UG/PG)
Course Status (core/elective)
Teaching Scheme: L T P
Weekly Schedule: Lectures/week, Tutorials/week,
Practical/week
Total No. of Teaching Hours
Evaluation Scheme: ISE, MSE, ESE
Passing Scheme:
Course Description

Brief course summary

Prerequisites
Course Outcomes

Course Outcomes

Course Outcome 1

Course Outcome 2

Course Outcome 3

Course Outcome 4
CO-PO Mapping and Summation
Matrix
Course Outcomes Evaluation Blooms COs to POs MAPPING: NIL: No Correlation, 1: Weak
through Level Correlation, 2: Strong Correlation

CO COs PO 1 PO PO PO 4 PO 9 PO PO PO
No. 2 3 10 11 12

Courses CO-PO Summation/Articulation

matrix (Place x in non-empty columns):
Assessment Methods and Evaluation
Schemes
Assessment Methods and Evaluation Evaluation - COs Mapping: NIL: No Correlation,
Schemes 1: Correlation
Evaluation Evaluation Blooms CO 1 CO 2 CO 3 CO 4 Start End
Weight
Type Through Level Date Date

Evaluation - CO Summation/Articulation
matrix (Place x in non-empty columns)
Assessment Criteria

In semester Exam Assessment Criteria Weekly

assignments
Weekly assignments 10%

Mini-Projects
Quizzes Quizzes
10%
Unit Test
Final Exam
Final Exam 50% In semester
Exam/ Unit
Test
30%
 Lecture/Teaching Plan
Topic Learning Planned/
Outcomes/ Delivered Mode of Delivery/
TLO. Units & Ref. Lect.
Question Bank/ CO BL Date Delivery Strategy
No: Topics Book No:
Lab (Activity)/ Instructions
Experiments
Required Materials

Books
Articles
Reading Web
Other

Project/Mini- Supplies
Projects, Case Equipment
Other project materials
Study

Technology/Tools Software and hardware

Resources

Web & Labs, Study

Social Media
Software Tools Groups

Class web site Twitter

Labs
Collaboration
Facebook
tools

Mobile/Other Study groups

Other
apps
Instructional Methods

Briefly describe instructional methods

Lectures
Demonstrations
Class discussion/Virtual discussions
Individual/group projects
Labs
Active Learning Techniques Plan
Name of Activity: Summary Writing
Why this activity?
The students are not doing homework on continuous basis and have no
practice of summarizing concepts.
Plan Date/s:
Description:
Summary writing involves students to brief their understanding in writing
making most from the lecture.
Objectives:
To involve student to be engaged at the end of the lecture.
Let students identify the topics that are clearly understood and not out of
each lecture.
Active Learning Techniques Plan
Plan:
This activity was planned for one unit which consisted of 6 lectures.
Execution:
At the end of each lecture the students were given 10 minutes to
summarize their understanding.
The students were then asked to revise all the summary sheets and
provide the conclusions like rating of their answers and clarity in
concepts.
Active Learning Techniques Plan
Observations/ Outcomes:
During the summary writing the students were actively participating and
enjoyed evaluating the peers.
It is observed that the students approached to clarify their droughts with
specific questions rather than asking to explain the entire topic.
This activity was easy to implement even with a large size class.
The observed benefits of summary writing are as follows:
After completion of the activity each student could:
Identify the topics that were clearly understood and not understood.
Identify the topics that were simple and complex.
Self and peer evaluate the summary and make comments.
Active Learning Techniques Plan
Feedback:
The following are few comments from the students:
Summary writing was like a self-study with ease
I clearly know on what I should revise at the end of lecture.
The summary of each lecture maintained facilitated to map the concepts of
the entire unit.
Nice practice to learn and clarify in the same lecture.
Conclusion/Summary:
Summary writing was very useful for both the students and faculty to get
feedback about the students level of understanding. It briefed the students
understanding in their own words and was easy to implement in a class with
large number of students. The comments provided by the students are in
favor of the activity.
Course Exit Survey and Past 3
Years Results
Course Exit Survey Questions for In-Direct Attainment

Courses Past Results: last 3 years

Sr. Average % or Avg. Score out # of
Curriculum Year SEM Pass %
No : Course attainment of ( ) Students
 Summary: Courses CO-Attainment and Analysis
COURSE Base
% of Attainment: Can be hand written after declaring results
OUTCOMES: Value

In-
Sr. No: CO Direct Total Remarks/Gap Analysis Recommendations
Direct

CO_1 50% 55.67 85.41 61.62

Students are unable to explain Poster designs and Concept maps
the networking concepts in may help students to memorize
CO_2 50% 52.95 85.68 59.50 writing as they are facing the concepts better
difficulties to memorize several
protocols.
Average %
attainment of Total CO Pass Avg. # of
69.81 83.14 72.47
course for last 3 attainment %: Score Students
Years:
Resolutions made (By Faculty/ Department): future use Status:
1. ISE-1 included Poster design and Concept map. 1. Resolutions were put in to practice and will
2. Students facing difficulties to implement socket programs be continued further.
will be counseled from the next semester.
Questions?