G.R.A.S.P.S.

English 7
Pre-Colonial Philippine Literature
G.R.A.S.P.S.
Performance Standard

The learner transfers learning by:

showing appreciation for the literature of the past;
comprehending texts using appropriate reading styles;
participating in conversations using appropriate context-dependent
expressions;
producing English sounds correctly and using the prosodic features of
speech effectively in various situations;
and observing correct subject-verb agreement.
Differentiated Task Number 1
G Promote pre-colonial tourist
spots in the Philippines through a
song/jingle.
R Promoter/Composer/Singer
A DOT Personnel, Recording
Company, Music Critics
S The DOT is in need of a creative
and engaging song to promote the
tourist spots in the Philippines.
P Original composition of song.
S Content, Grammar Accuracy,
Creativity, Execution,
Cohesiveness.
Differentiated Task Number 2
G To prove whether baybayin
or alibata should be
implemented/taught to the
primary level (Gr. 1-3).
R Arbiter/Pro/Con
A Panelist, Students, Teachers
S A school event wherein a social
issues both sides would be
analyzed.
P A proper debate.
S Content, Grammar Accuracy,
Creativity, Execution,
Cohesiveness.
Differentiated Task Number 3
G To showcase the different
equipment & culture of different
local regions through a mini
exhibit/presentation.
R Presenter, Organizer
A students, teachers, outsiders
S Foundation Week needs a mini
exhibit regarding the pre-colonial
Philippine Culture.
P An exhibit
S Content, Grammar Accuracy,
Creativity, Execution,
Cohesiveness.
 Category 4 3
Content Excellent; the content of
the topic is well rehearsed
and pronunciation of words
are well-used.
Grammar Accuracy Outstanding; there are no
errors in both oral and
written.
Cleverness Outstanding; the group
ideas were excellent and
resourceful
Execution Outstanding; the delivery
was flawless and the
message as clear.
Good; relatively
interesting, the content of
the topic is rehearsed and
has few pronunciation
errors.
Good; there are some
errors but the delivery was
clear.
Good; the group was able
to give a presentable
performance.
Good; errors were present
but the message was
limpid.
2 1
Average; delivery is not Poor; delivery is not
smooth with many smooth and there is no
pronunciation errors. interest in the content.
Presentation is
incomprehensible due to
pronunciation.
Average; errors were Poor; both oral and written
abundant but still grammar were mediocre.
understandable.
Average; very minimal Poor; a lack lustered
effort was made but still performance resulting in a
pleasing to the eyes. mundane outcome.
Average; mistake were Poor; there was a lack of
abundant but was able to practice resulting in poor
complete the execution.
performance.
Thank you very much!