Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
Learning goals
The learning goals of this lecture are to understand:
Patents
Trade marks
Copyright
Trade secrets
Patents:
Data-processing methods Nokia
Semiconductor circuits
Chemical compounds Trade secrets:
?
Disclosure:
before filing will invalidate the patent application the invention
will have been anticipated
means not only in writing but in any way at all
can be anywhere in the world "absolute novelty"
Rights conferred by a European patent are the same as the rights would
be if conferred by a national patent in each contracting state
in respect of which it is granted (Article 64 EPC)
But trade secrets can leak out and, if they do, there is no protection
Abstract (Article 85, Rule 47 EPC) around 150 words that can be used as
a search tool for other patent applications
Applicant
Representative, either:
a professional representative who is on a list maintained
by the EPO (Article 134(1) EPC), or
a legal practitioner entitled to act in patent matters
(Article 134(8) EPC)
Search report
Substantive examination
Typically, courts in European countries have adopted provisions on infringement based on acts
that undermine the right of the patent proprietor to prevent third parties' direct use of the
invention, in particular:
making, offering, putting on the market or using a product which is the subject-matter of the
patent, or importing or stocking the product for these purposes
using a process which is the subject-matter of the patent or, when the third party knows, or
it is obvious in the circumstances, that the use of the process is prohibited without the
consent of the proprietor of the patent, offering the process for use
offering, putting on the market, using, or importing or stocking for these purposes the
product obtained directly by a process which is the subject-matter of the patent
The extent of protection may go beyond that which is literally covered by the
claims, as interpreted or construed by the court, and may encompass also the
equivalents to the invention covered by the claims
Source:
Article 22(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 44/2001 of 22 December 2000
on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial
matters
There is no infringement because the act falls outside the patent claims
There is no infringement because the act is non-infringing, e.g. the rights
conferred by a patent generally do not extend to: (a) acts done privately and
for non-commercial purposes; (b) acts done for experimental purposes relating
to the subject matter of the patented invention
There is no infringement because the patent is invalid, i.e. the alleged infringer
can take legal action to challenge the validity of the patent
There is no infringement because the rights conferred by the patent have expired
Note:
If found invalid, the patent may be cancelled (revoked)
The losing party must usually pay both parties' costs
Out of court settlements including licensing or cross-licensing
may be a viable alternative to patent litigation for both parties
a person, whether or not the owner of a patent, who makes unjustified threats
that patent infringement proceedings will be initiated
a person aggrieved by the unjustified threats of patent infringement
proceedings then claiming damages against the person making the threats
However, typically under the applicable national law, a person is not considered
to have threatened another person with patent infringement proceedings merely by:
Damages
Blocking patents
Licensing or cross-licensing
Online databases:
Often free to use and valuable commercial tools
Why not go online and try a search?
www.espacenet.com
However, the aim of the lecture was not to make you an expert
in intellectual property law