Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AMONG EXPERTS
INTRODUCTION
Medical expulsive therapy (MET) assist
the spontaneous passage ureteral calculi
INTRODUCTION
PMET drugs presumed ureteral calculi
during pregnancy has not been studied
safety and utility are unknown
Selective
MATERIAL AND METOD
Questions assessed
worldwide geographic location and size
type of practice
degree of training
specialization in stone disease care, and
interval since training completion
use or nonuse of MET and P-MET,
preferred pharmacologic MET/ P-MET agents,
reasoning for nonuse
physicianreported perception of malpractice risk
environment.
RESULT
RESULT
RESULT
564 worldwide survey mean survey completion
time 2 minutes & dropout rate 3%.
289 (52%) completed Endourology fellowship
training or specifically focusing their practices on
urologic stone disease
90% using MET convenient or routinely adult
patient.
MET in nonpregnant adults high and not
influenced by region, training, time in practice,
specialization, or practice type.
RESULT
Expert practitioners less to utilize P-MET than
nonexperts this difference failed statistical
significance ( p = 0.06).
P-MET in AUA
prescribe 27.3%
dispensing 71.8%.
worldwide the time from training, degree of
specialization in stone care, and practice type
not to significantly interact with adoption of P-MET.
RESULT
RESULT
P-MET
1st tamsulosin 89.3% (Category B)
2nd Calcium channel blockers 7.3% (Category C)
3rd alfuzosin 6.9%(Category B)
reasons for rejecting PMET
adverse outcome 76.7%
legal risk 52.8%
safety 23.9%
influenced by local obstetrician 15.6%
felt P-MET ineffective 7.6% slightly higher 2.4% not using MET
in nonpregnant adults.
RESULT
perception medicolegal risk on average risk
55.4% not associated with a decreased
usage P-MET ( p = 0.21)
American urologists (65%)high risk US
medicolegally
US urologists rarely or never using P-MET
154 of 323 (47.7%) those regions US,
avoidance P-MET perception of high legal
risk.
DISCUSSION