Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Model Struktur
Konsep Struktur
Pemodelan Struktur
Analisis Struktur
Desain Elemen Struktur
Gambar Detail
Anggaran Biaya
Analisis Struktur
Engineer
Software
Engineer + Software
Baja (Baut)
Baja (Las)
Sambungan A
Sambungan B
Diagram Momen
(a) Struktur Rangka Dengan Dinding Geser (Shear Wall) - (b) Struktur Rangka Pemikul
Momen (SRPM) - c) Struktur Rangka Dengan Pengaku (Bracing)
PENGARUH LUAR
- Beban (Load)
- Getaran (Vibration)
- Penurunan
(Settlement)
- Temperatur
RESPON STRUKTUR
- Deformasi
(Displacements)
- Gaya Dalam (Internal
Force)
- Regangan (Strains)
- Tegangan (Stress)
RESPON STRUKTUR
- Deformasi
(Displacements)
- Gaya Dalam (Internal
Force)
- Regangan (Strains)
- Tegangan (Stress)
STRUKTUR
Analysis of Structures
xx yy zz
pvx 0
x
y
z
pv
pv
3D-CONTINUM
MODEL
(Governed by partial
differential equations)
CONTINUOUS MODEL
OF STRUCTURE
(Governed by either
partial or total differential
equations)
DISCRETE MODEL
OF STRUCTURE
(Governed by algebraic
equations)
Equilibrium
Actual Structure
xx yy zz
pvx 0
x
y
z
Partial Differential
Equations
FEM
Assumptions
Structural Model
Kr R
Stress-Strain Law
Compatibility
Algebraic
Equations
_
dV p u dV p u ds
t
v
t
s
K = Stiffness
r = Response
R = Loads
Loads (F)
Deformations (D)
Fv
F=KD
STRUCTURE
RESPONSES
EXCITATION
pv
Static
Dynamic
Elastic
Inelastic
Linear
Nonlinear
Elastic OR Inelastic
Ku F
2. Linear-Dynamic Elastic
Mu(t ) Cu (t ) Ku (t ) F (t )
3. Nonlinear - Static
Elastic OR Inelastic
Ku FNL F
4. Nonlinear-Dynamic
Elastic OR Inelastic
Mu(t ) Cu (t ) Ku (t ) F (t ) NL F (t )
Engineer
Engineer + Software
Software
Discretization of Continuums
General Solid
( Orthogonal dimensions)
Z
Regular Solid
X
Beam Element
Solid Element
Plate/ Shell
Membrane/ Panel
In-Plane, Only Axial
Plate/ Slab
Out of Plane, Only Bending
Shell
In-Plane and Bending
(c) 3D Plate-Frame
(e) 2D Frame
Fig. 1 Various Ways to Model a Real Struture
(d) 3D Frame
(f) Grid-Plate
Dimensions of Elements
1 D Elements (Beam type)
Can be used in 1D, 2D and 2D
2-3 Nodes. A, I etc.
Truss and Beam Elements (1D,2D,3D)
Plane Stress, Plane Strain, Axisymmetric, Plate and Shell Elements (2D,3D)
Dy
Dy
Rz
Dz
Dx
2D Truss
Dx
3D Truss
2D Beam
Ry
Dy
Rz
Dy
Dx
Rz
Dy
Dz
Rx
Dx
Rx
Rz
2D Frame
2D Grid
3D Frame
Ry ?
Dy
Dy
Dy
Rz
Rx
Dx
Membrane
Plate
Dz
Dx
Rz
Shell
Rx
Dx
Solid/ Brick
3D Frame
2D Grid
Membrane Model
x
1 unit
x2
x3
x1
3D Problem
2D Problem
Solid Model
Use 6 to 20 node
elements
Soil-Structure Interaction
Simple Supports
Fix, Pin, Roller etc.
Support Settlement
Elastic Supports
Spring to represent soil
Using Modulus of Sub-grade reaction
Membrane
Shell
Solid
OK
Dz
OK
OK
OK
Rx, Ry, Rz
OK
Rx ?
Dx, Dy
Rx ?
Rx, Ry, Rz
OK
OK
OK
Dx, Dy
OK
OK
Rx, Rz
OK
Rx, Rz
OK
OK
Rx, Rz
Rx, Ry, Rz
OK
Dx, Dz
OK
Rx, Rz
OK
OK
Dz
Dx, Dz
OK
OK
Plate
Solid
Plate
OK
Membrane
Shell
Frame
What Type of
Analysis should be
Carried Out?
Analysis Type
Static
Elastic
Linear
Linear-Elastic-Static Analysis
Static
Elastic
Nonlinear
Nonlinear-Elastic-Static Analysis
Static
Inelastic
Linear
Linear-Inelastic-Static Analysis
Static
Inelastic
Nonlinear
Nonlinear-Inelastic-Static Analysis
Dynamic
Elastic
Linear
Linear-Elastic-Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic
Elastic
Nonlinear
Nonlinear-Elastic-Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic
Inelastic
Linear
Linear-Inelastic-Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic
Inelastic
Nonlinear
Nonlinear-Inelastic-Dynamic Analysis
P-Delta Analysis
Buckling Analysis
Static Pushover Analysis
Fast Non-Linear Analysis (FNA)
Large Displacement Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Free Vibration and Modal Analysis
Response Spectrum Analysis
Steady State Dynamic Analysis
Static Vs Dynamic
Static Excitation
When the Excitation (Load) does not vary rapidly with Time
When the Load can be assumed to be applied Slowly
Dynamic Excitation
When the Excitation varies rapidly with Time
When the Inertial Force becomes significant
Elastic Vs Inelastic
Elastic Material
Follows the same path during loading and unloading and returns to initial
state of deformation, stress, strain etc. after removal of load/ excitation
Inelastic Material
Does not follow the same path during loading and unloading and may not
returns to initial state of deformation, stress, strain etc. after removal of
load/ excitation
Linear Vs Nonlinear
Linearity
The response is directly proportional to excitation
(Deflection doubles if load is doubled)
Non-Linearity
The response is not directly proportional to excitation
(deflection may become 4 times if load is doubled)
Linear-Elastic
Action
Action
Deformation
Action
Action
Deformation
Linear-Inelastic
Nonlinear-Elastic
Deformation
Nonlinear-Inelastic
Deformation
Continuum Vs Structure
A continuum extends in all direction, has infinite
particles, with continuous variation of material
properties, deformation characteristics and stress state
A Structure is of finite size and is made up of an
assemblage of substructures, components and members
Dicretization process is used to convert Structure to
Finite Element Models for determining response
Structure Types
Cable Structures
Cable Nets
Cable Stayed
Bar Structures
2D/3D Trusses
2D/3D Frames, Grids
Surface Structures
Plate, Shell
In-Plane, Plane Stress
Solid Structures
Structural Members
Continuum
Regular Solid
(3D)
y
Plate/Shell (2D)
x z
t<<(x,z)
z
x
z
Beam (1D)
b h
L>>(b,h)
h
b
A Point
A Line
An Area
A Volume
A system consisting of combination of
several mediums
Point Supports
Line Supports
Area Supports
Volume Supports
Load
Geometry
Medium
Support
Boundary
Point
Point Load
Concentrated Load
Node
Point Support
Column Support
Line
Beam Load
Wall Load
Slab Load
Beam / Truss
Connection Element
Spring Element
Line Support
Wall Support
Beam Support
Area
Slab Load
Wind Load
Plate Element
Shell Element
Panel/ Plane
Soil Support
Volume
Seismic Load
Liquid Load
Solid Element
Soil Support
Load
Vol.
Complexity of Load
Complexity of Medium
Complexity of Boundary
Area
Line
Point Line
Line
Area
Volume
Boundary
Area
Volume
Medium
Point
Line
Area
Volume
Objects in ETABS
Building Object Specific Classification
Finite Elements
Shell
Plate
Membrane
Beam
Node
+V2
+P
+V3
+V3
+P
+V2
+M2
+T
+M3
3
+M3
+T
+M2
Shell Element
General
Total DOF per Node = 6 (or 5)
Total Displacements per Node = 3
Total Rotations per Node = 3
Used for curved surfaces
U3, R3
U3, R3
U2, R2
Node 3
U2, R2
Node 4
U1, R1
Application
For Modeling surface elements carrying
general loads
U3, R3
1
U3, R3
U2, R2
Node 1
U1, R1
U2, R2
Node 2
U1, R1
Shell
U1, R1
Plate Element
General
Total DOF per Node = 3
Total Displacements per Node = 1
Total Rotations per Node = 2
Plates are for flat surfaces
U3
U3
R2
Node 3
Node 4
R1
Application
For Modeling surface elements carrying
out of plane loads
R1
2
U3
R2
Node 1
R2
U3
R2
Node 2
R1
R1
Plate
Membrane Element
General
Total DOF per Node = 3 (or 2)
Total Displacements per Node = 2
Total Rotations per Node = 1 (or 0)
Membranes are modeled for flat surfaces
Application
For Modeling surface elements carrying
in-plane loads
R3
U2
U2
Node 4
Node 3
U1
3
U1
R3
U2
Node 1
R3
U2
Node 2
U1
Membrane
U1
Zipper
Architecture
Building Services
Construction Eng.
Value Eng.
Aesthetics
Ergonomics Eng.
Structural Eng.
Knowledge Eng.
Economics
Artificial Intelligence
System Eng.
Common Sense
Construction
Engineering
Structural
System Selection
Artificial Intelligence
Value of
an Option
Vl Ai S i
i 1
Global
Importance
Weights and
Scores
B S C
j 1
ij
ij
Sub
Importance
Weights and
Scores
k 1
ijkl
S ijk
Suitability
Value and
Score
i 1
C
S
ijkl ijk
k 1
Vl Ai S i
Bij Sij
j 1
Am
Sub Criteria Bin
Item p
Item k
Bmn
Item p
Item p
Wt
Score
Wt
Score
Wt
Score
Wt
Score
Score
Cijkl
Sijkl
Cijnl
Sijpl
Cinkl
Sinkl
Cinnl
Sinpl
Smnpl
System 1
System l
System - q
System
Value
(V)
Representation of Suitability
10
8,9
6,7
4,3
1,2
Vertical Load
Resisting Systems
The Components Needed to
Complete the Load-Transfer Path
for Vertical Gravity Loads
Vertical Load
Behavior and Response
Conventional Approach
For Wall Supported Slabs
Assume load transfer in One-Way or Two-Way manner
Uniform, Triangular or Trapezoidal Load on Walls
Single Path
Single Path
Slab On Walls
Slab on Columns
Dual Path
Slab On Beams,
Beams on Columns
Mixed Path
Complex Path
Slab On Walls
Slab On Beams
Beams on Walls
Slab on Beams
Slab on Walls
Beams on Beams
Beams on Columns
To Lines
To Points
D
B
Slab T = 200 mm
Beam Width, B = 300 mm
Beam Depth, D
a) 300 mm
b) 500 mm
c) 1000 mm
5 .0 m
Design Strip
Design Strip
Middle Strip
Column Strip
Middle Strip
Design Strip
Middle Strip
L2
Column Strip
Middle Strip
Drop Panels
Longitudinal Beams
Transverse Beams
L1
L2
Lateral Load
Resisting Systems
The Components Needed to
Complete the Load-Transfer Path
for Lateral Loads
Single System
Dual System
Shear Wall - Frames
Tube + Frame + Shear Wall
Lateral Loads
Primary Lateral Loads
Load generated by Wind Pressure
Load generated due to Seismic Excitation
Braced Frame
The lateral loads is primarily
resisted by the Axial Force in
the braces, columns and
beams in the braced zone.
The frame away from the
braced zone does not have
significant moments
Bracing does not have to be
provided in every bay, but
should be provided in every
story
Tubular Structure
The system is formed by using
closely spaced columns and deep
spandrel beams
The lateral loads is primarily
resisted by the entire building
acting as a big cantilever with a
tubular/ box cross-section
There is a shear lag problem
between opposite faces of the tube
due to in-efficiency of column
beam connection
The height to width ratio should
be more than 5
Lateral Load
Resisting
System
Behavior, Response
and Modeling
2. 3D Frame Model
A special model suitable for buildings that uses the concept of Rigid
Floor Diaphragm
Modeling as 2D Frame(s)
Convert 3D Building to an assemblage of 2D Frames
Using Independent Frames
Using Linked Frames
Using Sub-Structuring Concept
Advantages
Easier to model, analyze and interpret
Fairly accurate for Gravity Load Analysis
Main Problems:
4. Obtain results
3. Discretize
the Model,
apply loads
Linked Elements
Shear Wall
F2
F3
Modeling
Plan
F1
F2
F3
Use Diagonal
Bracing
Use Diagonals
In 3D Frame Models
Use Plate
Elements
uilding d.o.f.s
F1 , 1
UL
r
rY
F3 , 3
UL3
X
UL2
rx
UL1
F3 , 2
F2 , 1
Lines
Beams
Areas
Deck:
Represents a Steel Metal Deck, One way Load Transfer
Plank : Represents clearly on-way slab portion
Slab:
Represents one-way or two-way slab portion
Opening: Represents Openings in Floor
Automatic Meshing
ETABS automatically meshes all line objects with frame
section properties into the analysis model
ETABS meshes all floor type (horizontal) area objects (deck
or slab) into the analysis model
Meshing does not change the number of objects in the
model
To mesh line objects with section properties use Edit menu
> Divide Lines
To mesh area objects with section properties use Edit menu
> Mesh Areas
Automatic Meshing
AutomaticMeshingofLineObjects
Frameelementsaremeshedatlocationswhereotherframe
elementsattachtoorcrossthemandatlocationswherepoint
objectslieonthem.
Lineobjectsassignedlinkpropertiesareneverautomatically
meshedintotheanalysismodelbyETABS
ETABSautomaticallymeshes(divides)thebracesatthepoint
wheretheycrossintheanalysismodel
Noendreleasesareintroduced.
AutomaticMeshingofLineObjects
Beam 1
Girder A
Beam 2
Beam 1
Piece 1
Piece 2
Beam 2
Piece 3
Girder B
a) Floor Plan
Example showing how beams are automatically divided (meshed) where they
support other beams for the ETABS analysis model
AutomaticMeshingofAreaObjects
ETABSautomaticallymeshesafloortypeareaobjectupintofour
sided(quadrilateral)elements
Eachsideofeachelementofthemeshhasabeam(RealorImaginary)
orwallrunningalongit
ETABStreatsawallliketwocolumnsandabeamwherethecolumns
arelocatedattheendsofthewallandthebeamconnectsthecolumns.
Eachcolumnisassumedtohavefourbeamsconnectingtoit
Thefloorisbrokenupatallwallsandallrealandimaginarybeamsto
createameshoffoursidedelements
AutomaticMeshingofAreaObjects
Girder B
a) Floor Plan
Beam 3
Beam 2
Beam 1
Girder A
Beam 3
Beam 2
Beam 1
Girder A
Girder B
b) ETABS Imaginary Beams Shown Dashed c) ETABS Automatic Floor Meshing
AutomaticMeshingofAreaObjects
Example of ETABS
automatically generated mesh
for floor-type area objects
AutomaticMeshingofAreaObjects
ForfloorsthatareautomaticallymeshedbyETABSitis
recommendedthatmodelbeams(oratleastnulltypelineobjects)
areconnectingcolumnsratherthannobeams(orlineobjects)
Thismakestheautomaticmeshingfortheanalysismodelcleaner,
fasterandmorepredictable
Includingbeamsand/ornulltypelineobjectsbetweenall
columnsinyourmodelmakesautomaticfloormeshingmore
predictable
AutomaticMeshingofAreaObjects
C4
C3
C4
C3
C4
C3
C1
a)
C2
C1
b)
C2
C1
c)
C2
C4
C3
C4
C3
C4
C3
C1
d)
C2
C1
e)
C2
C1
f)
C2
C4
C3
C4
C3
C4
C3
C1
g)
C2
C1
h)
C2
C1
i)
C2
Load Transformation
Themainissue:
Howpointloads,lineloadsandarealoadsthatlieonanarea
objectinyourobjectbasedETABSmodelarerepresentedin
theanalysismodel
There are four distinct types of load transformation in
ETABS for out-of-plane load transformation for floor-type
area objects
withdecksectionproperties
withslabsectionpropertiesthathavemembranebehavioronly
allothertypesofareaobjects
Inplaneloadtransformationforalltypesofareaobjects
Load Transformation
AreaObjects
loadtransformationoccursafterany
automaticmeshingintotheanalysis
model
ETABSnormalizesthecoordinatesof
thefourcornerpointsofthearea
object
Thenormalizationisthekey
assumptioninthismethod
Itisaperfectlyvalidassumptionifthe
quadrilateralisasquare,rectangularor
aparallelogram
a) Quadrilateral Element
s
(-1, 1)
(-1, -1)
(-1, 1)
(1, 1)
2
4
(1, -1)
(-1, -1)
(1, 1)
(r, s)
1
r
P
4
(1, -1)
d) Point Load, P
Load Transformation
Theloaddistributionfordecksectionsisoneway,in
contrasttoslabsectionswhichareassumedtospanintwo
directions
ETABSfirstautomaticallymeshesthedeckinto
quadrilateralelements
OncethemeshingiscompleteETABSdeterminesthe
meshedshellelementsthathaverealbeamsalongthemand
thosethathaveimaginarybeams
Italsodetermineswhichedgesofthemeshedshellelements
arealsoedgesofthedeck.
Load Transformation
RectangularInteriorMeshedElementwithUniformLoad
x/2
Edge 3
x/2
wx / 2
Edge 3
Edge 2
Edge 4
Edge 2
Edge 4
Ifthesupportingmember
attheendpointofan
imaginarybeamisitself
imaginary,thentheload
fromtheimaginarybeam
tributarytothatendpoint
islost,thatis,itis
ignoredbyETABS
Uniform load = w
Edge 1
a) Rectangular Interior Element
of Meshed Floor
Edge 1
b) Distribution of Uniform Load
Exampleofrectangularinteriormeshed
elementwithauniformload
Load Transformation
RectangularInteriorMeshedElementwithPointLoad
ETABSdistributesthepointloadtotheappropriateedgebeams
(basedonthedirectionofthedeckspan)
IfthebeamsalongedgesarerealbeamsETABStransferstheloadonto
adjacentbeams
x1
x2
P * x1
x1 + x2
Edge 3
Point load, P
Edge 2
Edge 4
Ifthesupporting
memberattheendpoint
ofanimaginarybeamis
itselfimaginary,thenthe
loadfromtheimaginary
beamtributarytothat
endpointislost,thatis,
itisignoredbyETABS
Edge 1
a) Rectangular Interior Element
of Meshed Floor
Edge 4
x1
Edge 2
x2
c) Loading on Edge 2
P * x2
P * x2
P * x1
x1 + x2
x1 + x2
x1 + x2
d) Loading on Edge 4
Load Transformation
RectangularInteriorMeshedElementwithLineLoad
Alineloadistransformedinasimilarfashiontothatforapointload
usinganumericalintegrationtechnique
Thelineloadisdiscreditedasaseriesofpointloadswhichare
transformedtosurroundingbeams
Theseriesofpointloadsisthenconvertedbacktoalineloadonthe
surroundingbeams
Anarealoadthatdoesnotcovertheentireelementisalsotransformed
inasimilarfashiontothatforapointloadusinganumericalintegration
technique.
GeneralInteriorMeshedElement
Uniform load
Midpoint
Midpoint
Line 3 P3
P3
P2
P2
P1
b)
c)
Line 2
P1
Line 1
b)
d)
f) Loading on Edge 1
Exampleofgeneralinteriormeshed
elementwithapointload
g) Loading on Edge 2
h) Loading on Edge 3
i) Loading on Edge 4
Exampleofgeneralinteriormeshedelementwitha
uniformload
ExteriorMeshedElement
D
B eam 2b
B eam 2a
Beam 3b
D
Beam 3a
Imaginary
Beam 6
Beam 3a
Beam 1b
No beam at
edge of deck
b) Deck Meshing
Beam 2b
Beam 1b
a) Floor Plan
No beam at
edge of deck
Beam 4a
a) Floor Plan
b) Deck Meshing
Imaginary Beam 5
Beam 1a
Beam 2a
Beam 3b
Beam 1a
Exampleofexteriormeshedelements
withcantileverbeamsextendingto
edgeofdeck
Beam 1b
B eam 2b
Edge of deck is at
center of spandrel
beam, typical in this
example
Beam 1a
B eam 2a
Beam 1b
Beam 2b
Exampleofexteriormeshed
elementswithrealbeamsonall
sides
Beam 4b
Beam 3b
Imaginary Beam 5
Beam 3a
ImaginaryBeam 6
Beam 2a
No beam at
edge of deck
a) Floor Plan
b) Deck Meshing
E2
Beam 2b
Exampleofexterior
meshedelements
withcantilever
beamsextendingto
edgeofaskewed
deck
Beam 1b
Beam 3a
E1
Beam 3b
ImaginaryBeam 6
Beam 2a
Beam 2b
Beam 1b
Beam 3b
Beam 1a
Beam 3a
Beam 2b
No beam at
edge of deck
Beam 1a
Beam 1b
ExteriorMeshedElement
ExteriorMeshedElement
Edge of deck
D
Beam 1
Beam 1
a) Floor Plan
Column 1
Beam 2
Beam 2
Column 1
b) Deck Meshing
ExteriorMeshedElement
a) Floor Plan
Beam 1b
b) Deck Meshing
Beam 3b
I
J
Beam 3a
Beam 1a
Beam 2b
Beam 1b
Beam 2a
Beam 2a
Beam 1a
Beam 2b
EffectofDeckOpenings
6'
14'
6'
4'
6'
14'
4'
4'
0.6 klf
2'
0.2 klf
Beam 1
6'
14'
d) Unframed, loaded opening
0.7k
0.7k
0.1 klf
0.6 klf
6'
0.6 klf
2'
4'
Beam 1
b) Floor Plan with Framed Opening
(Beams on all Sides)
0.6 klf
1.5k
1.5k
0.1 klf
0.6 klf
Load Transformation
VerticalLoadTransformationforFloorswithMembrane
SlabProperties
onlyappliestofloortypeareaobjectswithslabsection
propertiesthathavemembranebehavioronly
Theloaddistributionformembraneslabsectionsistwoway
Theactualdistributionofloadsontheseelementsisquite
complex
ETABSusestheconceptoftributaryloadsasasimplifying
assumptionfortransformingtheloads
3 3
1
midpoints
FloorswithMembraneSlabProperties
1
h) Real beams on two
adjacent sides plus
one vertical support
element at corner point
4 4
2 2
1
1
a) Real beams on all sides
3 3
2 2
1
b) Case 1 of real beams on
three sides
3
4
3 3
1
1
c) Case 2 of real beams on
three sides
1
d) Real beams on two
adjacent sides
1
e) Real beams on two
opposite sides
2
midpoint
1
1
2
2
1
h) Real beams on two
adjacent sides plus
one vertical support
element at corner point
3
2
3
1
2
k) Vertical support
elements at three
corner points (no real
beams)
1
2
l) Vertical support
elements at two
adjacent corner points
(no real beams)
1
Real beam at shell edge
1
n) Vertical support
elements at one
corner point (no
real beams)
3 3
1
m)Vertical support
elements at two
opposite corner points
(no real beams)
3
3
midpoints
1
i) Real beam on one side
plus two vertical
support elements at
corner points
1
f) Real beam on one side
1
2
j) Vertical support
elements at all corner
points (no real beams)
1
1
2
2 2
1
i) Real beam on one side
plus two vertical
support elements at
corner points
FloorswithMembraneSlabProperties
3
4 4
2 2
4 4
2 2
1
1
a) Full uniform load
transformation
1
b) Partial uniform load
transformation
4 4
2 2
4 4
2 2
1
c) Line load transformation
1
d) Point load transformation
6
5
6.0
4
6.0
3
2
1
2.8
2.8
4.0
4.0
5.5
5.5
4.0
4.0
6
5
C2
C1
6.0
4
B1 = 0.25 x 0.4
B2 = 0.25 x 0.5
B1
6.0
B2
S1 = 0.15
3
2
1
2.8
2.8
4.0
4.0
5.5
5.5
4.0
4.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.5
2.0
6
Section
7.0
4
8.0
3
8.0
2
Plan
Typical Floor
(B1, B2, 4-35)
7.0
1
A
6.0
6.0
8.0
8.0
6.0
6.0
7.0
4
8.0
3
8.0
2
Plan
Floor 1-2
7.0
1
A
6.0
6.0
8.0
8.0
6.0
6.0
7.0
4
8.0
3
8.0
2
Plan
Floor 3
7.0
1
A
6.0
6.0
8.0
8.0
6.0
6.0
32 @ 3.5
2@
5.0
2 @ 2.8
Section at
C and D
5
32 @ 3.5
2@
5.0
2 @ 2.8
Section at
B and E
5
32 @ 3.5
2@
5.0
2 @ 2.8
Section at
A and G
5