Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DEVICES
Presentation made in partial fulfilment of
Microfluidics and its Applications (ME F423)
Jacob John
Rahul Salla
Srijani Biswas
PART A: INTRODUCTION OF
THE PROCESS MODEL
TYPES OF IMPLANTABLE
SYSTEMS
1. Passive
2. Active
Control over
Passive
Active
Total dose
Yes
Yes
Delivery timing
No
Yes
Dose rate
No
BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF THE
MATERIALS
The in vivo biocompatibility and biofouling of many of the fabrication
materials used here has been studied before (i.e. gold, silicon nitride,
silicon) in the context of similar microsystem drug delivery devices
Of these materials, silicon is the least biocompatible
But - can undergo a number of simple surface passivation processes, such as
silanation, to improve its performance.
Reference:
Voskerician, G., Shive, M. S., Shawgo, R. S., Recum, H. V., Anderson, J. M., Cima, M. J., & Langer,
R. (2003). Biocompatibility and biofouling of MEMS drug delivery devices.Biomaterials,24(11),
1959-1967. doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00565-3
AUTONOMOUS
MICROSYSTEMS?
Systems, enabled through microfabrication technology, that
function of their own accord with the ability to interpret and interact
with their environment.
One of the limitations of these devices, and all autonomous
microsystems, is that the power load is relatively large compared
with the amount of energy available from current battery technology.
*
Reference:
Chung, A. J., Kim, D., & Erickson, D. (2008). Electrokinetic microfluidic devices for rapid,
low power drug delivery in autonomous microsystems.Lab Chip,8(2), 330-338.
doi:10.1039/b713325a
ELECTROACTIVE MICROWELL
Schematic representative section of
an electroactive microwell drug
delivery system developed here.
Inset: cross sectional view of the
system.
Courtesy:
Chung, A. J., Kim, D., & Erickson, D. (2008).
Electrokinetic microfluidic devices for
rapid, low power drug delivery in
autonomous microsystems.Lab Chip,8(2),
330-338. doi:10.1039/b713325a
OPERATION
(a) Stage 1: to electrochemically dissolve
the membrane a potential is applied
between the two upper electrodes.
(b) Stage 2: after dissolution to eject the
contents, the potentials applied between
the upper electrode and the lower one on
the PDMS.
(c) Magnified view of microchip from above
looking at the region near the membrane.
Pale yellow regions (membrane and Cshape gold features) are gold where the
polyimide layer was etched.
(d) An example of goldPDMS bottom
substrate.
Time lapse
illustrating
repulsion the
ejection of 1.9
mm fluorescent
polystyrene
microsphere
particles from
an electroactive
microwell.
Reference:
Chung, A. J., Kim, D., & Erickson, D. (2008). Electrokinetic microfluidic devices for rapid, low
power drug delivery in autonomous microsystems.Lab Chip,8(2), 330-338.
doi:10.1039/b713325a
Reference:
Chung, A. J., Kim, D., & Erickson, D. (2008). Electrokinetic microfluidic devices for rapid, low power
drug delivery in autonomous microsystems.Lab Chip,8(2), 330-338. doi:10.1039/b713325a
Reference:
Chung, A. J., Kim, D., & Erickson, D. (2008). Electrokinetic microfluidic devices for rapid, low power
drug delivery in autonomous microsystems.Lab Chip,8(2), 330-338. doi:10.1039/b713325a
Reference:
Chung, A. J., Kim, D., & Erickson, D. (2008). Electrokinetic microfluidic devices for rapid, low power
drug delivery in autonomous microsystems.Lab Chip,8(2), 330-338. doi:10.1039/b713325a
CONCLUSION: KEY
ADVANTAGES OF THIS
MODEL
Reduced dosage time (from hours to seconds) over previous
diffusion based approaches
Very low power consumption, when compared to other dosing
systems, using as little as 20 mJ of energy per dose
MODEL GEOMETRY
DIMENSIONS:
MATERIALS USED IN
SIMULATION
The boundary of the well plane is silicon.
FICKS LAWS
The molar flux due to diffusion is proportional to the concentration
gradient.
The rate of change of concentration at a point in space is
proportional to the second derivative of concentration with space.
GOVERNING EQUATIONS
For a species i,
: Molar flux
: Diffusion Coefficient
: Concentration
: Source or Sink of quantity
MESHING:
Name
Value
5.0E-5
1.88E-7
Curvature factor
0.25
1.2
Predefined size
Extra fine
SOLUTION:
After the dissolution of the membrane
After 5 seconds
VIDEO:
GRAPH:
PART C: IMPROVEMENTS IN
THE BENCHMARK MODEL
DRAWBACKS OF THE
BENCHMARK MODEL
The dissolution of the gold membrane on top of the pyramidal
microwell is not economically feasible.
Once the gold membrane seal is dissolved, it cannot be reused.
Hence the entire
contents of the microwell have to delivered at once.
IMPROVEMENT:
Optical microscope image of the area near a brass coated comb shaped electrode in a vibrating MEMS device
Comb-drive actuators for large displacements,Rob Legtenberg,A W GroeneveldandM Elwenspoek.Journal of Micromechanics and
Microengineering,Volume 6,Number 3
GEOMETRY:
The thickness of the silicon wafer defines the volume of the micro
well as well the opening of the micro well.
The thickness of 500 mm of the silicon wafer with 52 mm opening
was decided based on optimization results of micro well volume
and release time of the drug.
The thickness can be changed based on requirement for specific
drug delivery cases.
MARKET SURVEY:
Implantable drug delivery system is an active drug delivery system which helps in
targeted delivery as well as controlling the dosage of drugs.
The market demand for implantable drug delivery systems is expected to be $27
billion by 2020.
The Drug Delivery Technology market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 7.5% from
2016 to 2020.
http://www.openpr.com/news/377744/Implantable-Drug-Delivery-Devices-Market-Worth-US-27-Billion-by-2021.html
MARKET STUDY
Debiotech is a swiss company which has many micro and nono tech
based products like
nano-pump, debiostar, nanocoating, microneedles etc.
Information on many interesting products and projects are displayed on
the website of Debiotech. Interested people can visit
http://www.debiotech.com/newsite/page/index.php?page=home , for
more information.
Debiotech performsR&D based on breakthrough discoveries on
Artificial Organs, micro- and nano-technology,Drug Delivery Systems,
Diagnostics and Medical Devicesin anindependententrepreneurial
environmentwhich permits rapid decision making.
CONCLUSIONS:
By 2020, MEMS based implantable drug delivery systems are
going to be the main mode of drug delivery.
The advantages of implantable drug delivery systems are, the
ability to autonomously deliver very precise doses, either
periodically or in response to a sensor event, delivery speed and
microscopic localization.
These systems have relatively simple construction and require low
voltage electrical actuation as opposed to mechanical pumping.
But the main drawback of the benchmark model chosen was the high
cost involved in its manufacturing due to the deposition of gold
membrane.
One possible solution to this problem would be the use of comb
electrode actuator to open and close the valve. Not only does it
reduce the production cost, it also helps in reusing the micro-well.
Major advances in the field of MEMS are taking place which will help
in reducing the cost of these devices so that it can replace the archaic
passive implantable drug delivery systems.
THANK YOU