Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DISTILLATION
INTRODUCTION
Membrane distillation = membrane + distillation
Membrane separation process which overcomes
the difficulties of other membrane processes
high solution concentration, concentration
polarization, ultra pure production, etc.
Process takes place at atmospheric pressure,
relatively low temperature than distillation heat
sensitive materials
Solar, geothermal energy, etc can be used
PRINCIPLE
Driving force = vapour pressure difference temperature
difference : as driving force is not purely thermal driving
force can be operated at relatively lower temperature
Mass transfer :
MEMBRANE
Porous
Should not be wetted by process fluid
No capillary condensation inside the pores of
membrane
Only vapour should be transported through the
pores
Should not alter the vapour equilibrium of
components
e.g. PTFE, PP, PVDF ,etc
TYPES OF Membrane
Distillation
1.
2.
3.
4.
TEMPERATURE
POLARIZATION
ADVANTAGES
The continuous vapour permeation increases the
evaporation in the warm liquid solution
High concentration at low temperature and
pressure
Integration with other membranes
Use of solar, wave, or geothermal energy
Less concentration polarization
Use of existing temperature gradients available in
the plant
LIMITATIONS
Treatment of solutions discharged at high
temperatures
Lower fluxes than in other membrane processes
Higher energy consumption than RO and NF
Membrane resistance not 100% decrease in
efficiency
Expensive membranes
APPLICATIONS
Concentration of non-volatile acid
Fermentation/MD integrated system
Desalination of water
Food industry
Industrial waste water treatment
WORK ON PROGRESS..
Vaccum multi-effect MD
Integration with RO and NF
Integration with FO
MD crystallization
Membrane distillation heat exchanger (MDHX)
CASE STUDIES
METAL
PICKCLING
EFFLUENTS
CONCENTRAT
E
MD
CRYSTALLIZAT
ION
PURE WATER OR
PURE HCL
SALTS
WATER TO
RINSING
RESULTS
Vapour composition is mainly affected by a hydrochloric acid
concentration in the feed and its temperature
At low acid concentration in the feed the permeate was pure
water.
The rise of acid concentration in the feed above 19% caused a
substantial increase in HC1 molar flux through the membrane.
Accumulated salt in the feed decrease HC1 solubility
(desalting out effect), thus the molar HC1 flux was then
higher than in the case of hydrochloric acid solution without
salt
The retention coefficient of the salt was 99.8%, thus permeate
was pure hydrochloric acid with a concentration which can be
significantly higher than in the feed .
CONCLUSIONS
The results of the experiments show that MD may
be a promising method of HC1 recovery from
industrial effluents
A part of a concentrated solution may be
recycled to favour the HCL desorption.
The useful products will be pure water, pure
hydrochloric acid, and metal salts after
crystallization from the supersaturated feed.
RESULTS
TIME
50 g
without
MD
150 g
with
MD
150 g
without
MD
0.47
O.47
0.4
0.4
20
0.49
0.50
0.4
0.43
40
0.45
0.49
0.38
0.45
60
0.34
0.46
CONCLUSION
The performance of fermentation in the membrane
bioreactor allows for a considerable acceleration
of its course and increases its efficiency through
the selective removal of fermentation products.