Vincent offered to sell his smartphone for RM1500 on an advert website. Lee responded offering RM1200, which was a counteroffer rather than acceptance of Vincent's original offer. Vincent rejected Lee's counteroffer. Lee then offered RM1500, the original asking price, but Vincent did not reply, so no contract was formed as Vincent did not accept Lee's final offer. According to the legal principle of Hyde v Wrench, a counteroffer rejects the original offer and replaces it with a new offer, so Lee's agreement to the original terms did not revive Vincent's initial offer.
Vincent offered to sell his smartphone for RM1500 on an advert website. Lee responded offering RM1200, which was a counteroffer rather than acceptance of Vincent's original offer. Vincent rejected Lee's counteroffer. Lee then offered RM1500, the original asking price, but Vincent did not reply, so no contract was formed as Vincent did not accept Lee's final offer. According to the legal principle of Hyde v Wrench, a counteroffer rejects the original offer and replaces it with a new offer, so Lee's agreement to the original terms did not revive Vincent's initial offer.
Vincent offered to sell his smartphone for RM1500 on an advert website. Lee responded offering RM1200, which was a counteroffer rather than acceptance of Vincent's original offer. Vincent rejected Lee's counteroffer. Lee then offered RM1500, the original asking price, but Vincent did not reply, so no contract was formed as Vincent did not accept Lee's final offer. According to the legal principle of Hyde v Wrench, a counteroffer rejects the original offer and replaces it with a new offer, so Lee's agreement to the original terms did not revive Vincent's initial offer.
3) In an advert website, Vincent offered for sale of his
latest smart phone for RM1,500. Lee knew that this was a real bargain as the particular smart phone is worth much more. Lee replied that he agrees to buy it for RM1200. Vincent answered, No way. Lee then stated that he will accept for RM1,500. Vincent did not reply to Lee. Advise Lee.
Vincents original offer was for RM1500. But Lee agrees to
buy for RM1200 not RM1500, so this is not acceptance but is a counter offer. Which mean he made a new offer to Vincent. Then, Vincent rejected Lees offer to buy at RM1200. After that, Lee agrees to buy at RM1500 so this will be a new offer to Vincent due to the original offer cannot be revived when rejected. Follow the fact that Vincent did not reply to Lee showed that he did not accept Lees latest offer.
Principle of Law Hyde v Wrench Counter offer is not acceptance, it will reject original offer and replace with new offer.