Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Index
Base Metrics
Project Management Metrics
Test Progress Metrics
Defects Metrics
Derived Metrics
Test Efficiency Metrics
Test Effectiveness Metrics
Group Standard Testing Metrics
4
NIKU
Track progress,
manage and replan
tasks
82
80
80
78
77
76
76
75
75
74
72
70
72
71
70
68
66
64
1
Release version
Planned Effort (person days)
NIKU
Track progress,
manage and replan
tasks
Schedule Variance
15-Sep-07
26-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
D a te
17-Jul-07
27-Jun-07
07-Jun-07
18-May-07
28-Apr-07
08-Apr-07
1
Release Version
Planned Start Date
Data Source
Main User
Manual Tracking, QC
Track progress,
manage and replan
tasks
60
50
50
40
40
30
20
10
10
0
Data Source
Main User
QC
Track progress,
manage and replan
tasks
Data Source
Main User
QC
Track progress,
manage and replan
tasks
No. of Te s t Cas e s
120
100
120
116
105
102
92100
80
60
40
20
0
1
Week No.
Planned Execution
Actual Execution
Defect Metrics
Defects Distribution by Severity/Status
Where collected
Data Source
Main User
QC
Track progress,
manage and replan
tasks
10
Defect Metrics
Defects Distribution by Root cause
Where collected
Data Source
Main User
QC
Process Improvement
Number of defects
20
15
Number of defects
10
5
0
Requirements
miss/unclear
Environment
Integration
Test
Code/Unit Test
Script miss
Control
Record Setup
Data
Root Cause
11
Data Source
Main User
QC, NIKU
Track progress,
manage and replan
Analyse test efficiency
, Process
Improvement
Data Source
Main User
QC, NIKU
Track progress,
manage and replan
Analyse test efficiency
, Process
Improvement
12
Where collected
Data Source
Main User
NIKU
Track progress,
manage and replan
Analyse test efficiency,
Process Improvement
13
Data Source
Main User
QC
200
160
3%
140
Total
120
100
80
R ejected
R ejected
Valid
154
60
40
97%
20
0
Num b er o f d efects
Number of Defects
180
5
4
3
Number of Defects
2
1
0
Code/Unit Test
Data
Working As Designed
14
(# valid defects detected in the current phase + # valid defects detected in the next testing phase)
X100
Where collected
Data Source
Main User
Analyse test
effectiveness, Process
Improvement
15
Data Source
Main User
QC
Analyse test
effectiveness, Process
Improvement
16
Data Source
Main User
QC
Analyse test
effectiveness, Process
Improvement
Test Coverage
11%
89%
17
Data Source
Main User
QC, NIKU
Analyse test
effectiveness,
efficiency
Process Improvement
18
Data Source
Main User
NIKU
Measures the
proportion of effort
spent on testing
against the whole
project
19
Where collected
Data Source
Main User
QC, Manual
submission by Testing
CoE or Regional IT
Quality Leads.
Measures the
proportion of the
number of defects
discovered in all
formal testing stages,
i.e. SIT, UAT, NFR or
performance test, OAT
etc, with that
discovered in the first
month of production
operations.
20