Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PROGRAM OVERVIEW
October 17, 2016
Discussion Agenda
Proud accomplishments
Local area review
Financial situation & forward looking analysis
Summary & conclusion
Academic Success
Ithaca Public Schools is consistently a high performing district in:
Math, Literacy, SAT
Ithaca High School offers advanced placement courses in:
World History, US History, Statistics, Biology, Physics & English Literature
25% of Ithaca High School Students take an AP course!
Source: Munetrix
Source:
Munetrix
using
State Pride
of Michigan
Data
Ithaca
Public
Schools
Where
Still Matters
Athletic Success
Boys Football State Champions
2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2015
Girls Cross Country State Champions
2014
Go Yellowjackets !!!
Extracurricular Offerings
Jr./Sr. High School has the only active school theater in Gratiot County
Extracurricular opportunities in the following areas are offered:
Band
Business Professionals of America
Model UN (United Nations) Won 23 league championships
Student run paper (The Growler) is the 2nd highest ranked school paper in the state
German Links foreign exchange program
Also, Science Olympiad, Quiz Bowl, Tech Club, Writing Team - plus more!
Ithaca (the city) has been in a slight decline over the last decade, but one thing
it does have is an Outstanding School District. These go hand in hand.
Ithaca Public Schools Where Pride Still Matters
7
11
However
Past performance is not an indication of future
success. One thing is for sure though - without
your help, our future is at risk!
12
Ithaca Public Schools has already repaid almost $250,000, but any
14
exceptional sports program and high academic achievement) was also caught
up in the same sham from MEP
Vassar also owes the state nearly $1,000,000
Ironically, this year Vassar received $750,000 from the Michigan Department
15
16
Source: Munetrix
17
Scenario Definitions
Baseline
Student count does not change for the period through 2017-2020.
Reduction of FTE in 2017
Scenario A
Compounded loss of 15 students per year through 2020
Reduction of 1 FTE in 2018 and 1 in 2020
Scenario B
Compounded loss of 30 students per year through 2020
Reduction of 2 FTE in 2018, 1 in 2019 and 1 more in 2020
Scenario C
Compounded loss of 30 students per year, but without $206K per year penalty (2018-20)
No staff reductions 2018-2020
Scenario D
No student loss and no penalty repayment, no staff reductions. (Best possible Outcome)
negatively impacting the quality of education and the safety of our students
For the 2016-2017 Fiscal Year we have:
One less FTE than in 2015-2016, even though state student to staff ratio analysis show that
19
20