Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OF GOVERNMENT
ECON 3440
Government in the US II
Federal functions:
State functions
Local functions:
In 1930, the federal governments activity accounted for only about 3.4% of GDP.
From the 1950s through the present, the size of government has averaged around
20% of GDP, although it grows during recessions.
ECON 3440 - PROF. WASSALL
From the mid-1970s through the mid-1990s, there was a relatively large deficit, which
shrank dramatically in the 1990s. The United States was back in deficit by the early
twenty-first century, with the deficit becoming very large in the late 2000s.
ECON 3440 - PROF. WASSALL
The stock of debt rose sharply in World War II, then fell steadily until large deficits
caused it to rise in the 1980s. The debt has risen considerably since, with a brief
pause in the mid- to late-1990s, and now is over 103% of GDP.
ECON 3440 - PROF. WASSALL
Unlike the federal government, state and local governments budgets are typically
in surplus: there is very little deficit overall across the state and local governments
in any year. Why?
ECON 3440 - PROF. WASSALL
In 1960, nearly half of federal government spending was on national defense. Today,
however, defense spending has fallen to less than one-fifth of the federal budget.
The Social Security program is the single largest government program in the United
States today.
ECON 3440 - PROF. WASSALL
Education, welfare, and public safety for almost 40% of state and local government
spending. The major development has been the parallel growth in health care
spending and the reduction in education spending. ECON 3440 - PROF. WASSALL
Over the past 40 years, the substantial drop in revenue from property taxes
has been made up by rising federal grants and income taxes.
ECON 3440 - PROF. WASSALL
Historical Development
The public sector has grown significantly over
the past century.
For a typical country the public sector was
small at the start of the twentieth century.
In the order of 5-10% of GDP
Historical Development II
The growth of public
spending since 1870 is
shown in this slide.
There is a persistent
difference in the level
of expenditure among
the countries.
The pattern of growth
is similar across the
countries.
In 1996 public
spending was 32.4% of
GDP in the US and 55%
in France.
60
50
40
United States
United
Kingdom
Germany
France
Japan
30
20
10
0
1870
1890
1910
1930
1950
1970
1990
2010
60
55
50
Germany
40
United Kingdom
35
United States
30
Japan
Australia
25
20
15
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
France
45
In 1960, the United States was squarely in line with the average of the OECD
in terms of the government spending share of GDP. Government growth was
much faster in other OECD nations in the 1960s and1970s. All have now
surpassed the United States.
ECON 3440 - PROF. WASSALL
The United States has higher debt levels than most other comparable nations,
but its load remains well below others.
ECON 3440 - PROF. WASSALL
50.00
40.00
30.00
Taxes/GDP
20.00
10.00
0.00
50.0
40.0
30.0
Top rate
20.0
10.0
0.0
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
Some Takeaways
The U.S. public sector grew relative to the size of the economy
throughout most of the 20th century.
By the early 1970s, the relative size of the U.S. public sector
leveled off in the range of 30-35 percent of GDP.
A similar event occurred in other first-world countries at roughly
the same time.
However, the share of government spending in GDP is different
from country to country.
The share of government in GDP in the U.S. is relatively low; for
example, it is 56 percent in France and 55 percent in Sweden.
Takeaways II
There are some differences in the amount the U.S. spends in
government services, as well as how they are provided, compared
to many other OECD countries.
We will look at these differences when we cover these services in
detail.
We saw some differences in the use of taxes.
Specifically, the U.S. exploits taxes on goods and services less
than most of its peers.
Because of this, despite an overall lower tax burden in the U.S.,
its marginal personal income tax rates are similar to those in other
OECD countries; its marginal corporation tax rates are higher.