Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 Welding Inspection
Root gap
dimension
Internal
alignment
1
2
3
4
Internal
alignment
Root gap
dimension
Pipe Inspection
Remember in the CSWIP 3.1 Welding Inspectors
examination your are required to conduct a
practical examination of a pipe test weld, complete
a thumb print sketch and a final report on your
findings
process
Welding process:
EXAMPLE PIP
Signature: I C
98
60
40
Arc Strike
25
API 1104
B
12
8
15
120
Slag
Slag
inclusion
NOTES:
Page 1 of 3
>1.0
mm
Cap height : 4mm. Weld width: 12-14mm
Under fill
DCode/Specification used:
Undercut
180
10
90
15
20
Lack of side
wall fusion
46
Name: [Block capitals]
Mr. I C Plenty
Under fill
140
Lack of side
wall fusion
Arc Strike
WELD FACE
PIPE ROOT
FACE
>1.0
mm
6
60
46
Excess
penetration
5mm
Poor stop
start
5
180
Undercut
38
Lack of root
fusion
120
120
NOTES:
10
Lack of root
penetration
90
15
20
40
Burn through
140
Lack of root
fusion
Smooth Undercut
<1.0mm
Penetration height: 2mm.
Misalignment (HI-LO): 2mm
Spatter on the pipe surface
I C Plenty
SPECIMEN NUMBER 001
EXTERNAL DEFECTS
Defects Noted
Defect Type
Accumulative
Total
2
Maximum
Allowance
3
Section/
Table No
4
Accept/Reject
5
4mm
1.6mm
7.8.2
Reject
Poor blend
Smooth
7.8.2
Reject
Incomplete filling
22mm
None
7.8.2
Accept
N/A
3mm
7.9.2
Accept
Slag Inclusions
70mm long
None
7.8.2
Reject
Undercut
1.5mm depth
0.8mm
9.7.2 Table 4
Reject
Surface Porosity
1.5mm
2mm
9.3.9.3
Accept
Cracks/Crack-like defects
40mm
NONE
9.3.10
Reject*
Lack of fusion
22mm
25mm
9.3
Accept
Arc strikes
30x25
------------
Not specified
Mechanical damage
NONE
------------
-----------
Accept
Laps/Laminations
NONE
------------
-----------
Accept
Misalignment (Linear)
2mm
3mm
7.2
Accept
N/A
------------
----------
Accept
Reject**
Defects Noted
Plate/Pipe
Section
Accumulative
Total
Defect Type
Section
No
Accept
Reject
A- C
Reinforcement (Appear) A - C
2.0 mm
Smooth
14
14
Reject
Reject
Incomplete filling
A- B
L=24
None
13
Reject
A- C
None
Accept
Slag Inclusions
Undercut
A- C
A- B
A- C
None
2
Accept
Reject
Accept
Reject
Reinforcement (Height)
Surface Porosity
Cracks/Cracklike Defect A - B
A- C
Lack of fusion
10% t
None
None
Accept
Arc Strike
A- B
2 Areas
None
Mechanical Damage
Laminations
A- B
Seek Advice
A- C
2 Areas smooth
None
Misalignment
A- C
None
Longitudinal Seams
A- C
None
4
15
Reject
Refer
Accept
Accept
Pipe only
Accept
Copyright 2006, TWI Ltd
A- C
Excessive Penetration B - C
Accept
None
L=24 D=2.5mm
2.0 mm
Reject
25 mm
11
Accept
Lack of Penetration
B-C
L=10
A- C
None
Accept
Root Concavity
A- C
None
Accept
Root Undercut
A- B
Accept
Crack/Cracklike Defect A - C
None
Accept
Slag Inclusions
A- C
None
Accept
Porosity
A- C
None
Accept
14/9/02
Date ..
Root Defects
EXTERNAL DEFECTS
Defect Type
Defects Noted
Pipe/Plate
Section
1
Accumulative
Total
2
Maximum
Allowance
3
Misalignment
A-A
2mm
3mm
A-A
4mm
------------
A-A
50mm
A-A
Root Concavity
Section/
Table No
4
Accept/Reject
5
7.2
Accept
Not
specified
Accept
25mm
9.3.1
Accept
20mm
25mm
9.3.4
Accept
A-A
2mm depth
1mm
9.3.6
Root Undercut
A-A
0.5mm
0.8mm
9.3.11
Accept
Cracks/Crack-like defects
A-A
NONE
------------
9.3.10
Accept
Slag inclusions
A-A
70mm long
None
7.8.2
Reject
Porosity
A-A
1.5mm
2mm
9.3.9.3
Reject
Laps/Laminations
A-A
NONE
------------
----------
Accept
I C Plenty
Signature.........................................................
Date.....................................................................................
*Delete which is not applicable.
Use the other side for any comments.
Any Questions
?
World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
7.8.2
Misalignment:
page 20
Reinforcement Appear:
7.8.2
Incomplete groove:
7.8.2
7.2 page 19
page 20
7.8.2
Slag inclusions:
9.3.8
Undercut:
9.3.11
Concave root:
page 24
Porosity:
9.3.9
Cracks:
9.3.10
Lack of fusion:
9.3.4
page 22
A.5.3
page 55
Mechanical damage:
Not referenced
Lamination:
Not referenced
Burn
page
24through:
9.3.6 page 22
9.3.7 page 22
page 24