Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RT=ST, ET =RT
RT= ST, ET RT
value RT=ST, ET RT
Past simple
Past perfect
Future in the past
RT ST, ET =RT
RT ST, ET RT
RT ST, ET RT
Future
Future perfect
RT ST, ET=RT
RT ST, ET RT
Tense
Tense
A common mistake in approaching the category of tense
is the belief that tense inflections alone mirror time in
grammar. In fact, time inflections are not enough to
render the temporal specification of a message. A proper
interpretation of temporal forms presupposes an
analysis of the relation between
(i) tense specficiation on the verb (i.e. the tense
inflections s, -ed) AND
(ii) temporal adverbials
Tense
The Inflection identifies the event denoted by the verb
phrase in the sense that it places that particular event in
time. A verb phrase consists of both its lexical head
(centre), the verb, and whatever complements the verb
selects.
We know that information about the selection of
complements by a verb represents part of the lexical
entry of that verb.
Tense
If we assume that the descriptive content of any verb is
the idea of event, we cannot conceive of this event
without taking into account the complements of the
respective verb as well as those explicit lexical means of
placing the event in time, i.e. the time adverbials.
This means that, when considering temporal
interpretation, we have to talk about temporal
interpertation at the level of the sentence or, at least, at
the predicate level.
Time adverbials
Time adverbials can be (i) adverbs, (ii) adverb phrases
and (iii) adverbial clauses. They specify reference time
(RT, present, past, future) together with the Tense
morphemes.
Tense morphemes, in their turn, are strongly related to
time adverbials. These adverbials add meaning to a
sentence and they might even disambiguate it.
Time adverbials
Sentences without
disambiguated due to
time
adverbials
may
be
Time adverbials
(8) Albert is playing tennis.
Default reading = now, at present
Alternative reading = tomorrow (as part of an
arrangement, plan)
(9) Albert was playing tennis.
Default reading = then, in the past
Alternative reading = future in the past (as part of an
arragement, plan made in the past)
Time adverbials
The relation between time adverbials and speech time
NOW (ST) can be explicit or non-explicit. Depending on
the relation to ST, we classify time adverbials into:
(i) Anchored time adverbials, which are in an explicit
relation to ST in the sense that their interpretation is
determined relative to ST: now, yesterday, tomorrow
(ii) Unanchored time adverbials, which do not have an
explicit relation to ST and which are oriented to times
other than the utterance time: in June, on Friday.
Time adverbials
Depending on their form, time adverbials can be classified
into:
(i) Simple: yesterday, now, tomorrow
(ii) Complex
(iia) concatenated adverbials: yesterday afternoon,
tomorrow morning
(iib) preposition + noun: before noon, at noon
Time adverbials
(10) Bill telephoned us at 10 oclock.
(11) Bill telephoned us at 10 oclock in the morning last
Wednesday.
(12) Last Wednesday, Bill telephoned at 10 oclock in the
morning.
The adverbials in all the three sentences above specify RT.
Time adverbials
(13) Phyllis decorated the cake before midday.
ST = now
RT ST (past, RT = midday)
ET RT (anterior, ET = before)
Time adverbials
Depending on their sense, time adverbials are classfied into:
(i) Anterior () yesteday, ago, last - specified past
on Tuesday, in July - unanchored
(ii) Simultaneous (=) now, at the moment - specified present
(iii) Posterior () tomorrow, next, in
on Tuesday, in July
- specified future
- unanchored
ST = now
RT = ST (not specified)
ET = RT (always)
ST = now
RT = ST
ET = ST (the frequency advebials specifies ET)
ST = now
ST = RT
ET = RT
Future reference
The simple present may acquire future reference in
(i) Simple sentences
(ii) Subordinate adverbial clauses of time (subordonate
circumstaniale de timp) and condition (subordonate
condiionale) introduced by after, as soon as, when,
before, if, unless, etc.
Future reference
In simple sentences, present with future reference is
accompanied by a temporal adverb that indicates the
reference time, i.e. future.
(33) The plane leaves for New York at 5 p.m. tomorrow.
The use of the simple present marks the fact that the
future event is bound to happen. In other words, the
anticipated event is attributed the same degree of
certainty that we assign to present / past events.
Future reference
For this reason, the simple present with future reference
represents the only marked way to express future time
in English. It refers to mostly official or collective
future plans / arrangements that cannot be changed. It
may relate to timetables, schedules, itineraries, etc.
(34) The caravan sets off tomorrow morning.
(35) We leave Bucharest on Monday morning, arrive in
London at noon and set off for Glasgow in the
evening.
Future reference
The use of the simple present with future reference in
adverbial clauses of time and condition is illustrated
below:
(36) Ill see what to do [when I meet him].
(37) [By the time you get there], the show will have
already started.
(38) I will be very unhappy [if our team does not win].
Future reference
If conjunctions such as when, if do not introduce a
time / conditional clause, the present with future
reference does not have to be used.
(39) I will talk to him when I see him.
Time clause
(40) I dont know when I will see him. Direct object
clause I dont know something.
(41) I will take my umbrella if it rains.
Conditional
(42) I dont know if it will rain. Direct object clause
I dont know something.
Historic Present
The use of present with past value is best known as the
historic present and represents a story tellers licence,
being typical of the oral narrative style.
The historic present is pretty frequent in connected
narratives: the speaker, as it were, forgets all about time
and imagines, or recalls, what he is recounting as
vividly as if it were now present before his eyes.
(Jespersen 1931: 117)
Historic Present
The simple present in this context occurs with a time
adverb that indictes a past moment:
(43) At that moment in comes a messenger from the
Head Office, telling me the boss wants to see me in a
hurry.
(example from tefnescu 1988)
Historic Present
A distinction has to be made between the historic
present described above and the present forms
employed to narrate fictional events.
The historic present is also used after verbs of linguistic
communication such as tell, say, learn, hear:
(44) Mary tells me that you are going to buy new
furniture (in a letter)
(45) Your correspondent, Mr. Pitt, writes in the March
issue that (the correspondence column of a journal)
Historic Present
In both of the above cases, the simple present stresses
the persistence in the present of the effect of a past
communication.
The historic present is used when describing an artist
and his work because this feels as if they were still
alive. The difference between using the present or the
past involves the speakers point of view: if she uses the
present, then she considers that the artist still survives
through his work; if she uses the past, she sees the artist
from a neutral viewpoint.
Historic Present
Compare:
(46) Brahms is the last great representative of German
classicism.
(47) Brahms was the last great representative of German
classicism.
Historic Present
The simple present appears in newspaper headlines to
announce recent events. It is also present in historical
summaries and tables of dates:
(48) Ex-president dies of heart attack.
(49) 1876 Brahms finishes his first simphony.
Historic Present
The simple present may also refer to imaginary
situations.
This fictional use makes reference to no real time, but to
an imaginary present, giving the reader / participant in
the conversation the impression that she is actually
witnessing the events described. In such cases, the
simple present often alternaties with a past tense.
Historic Present
Historic Present
ST = now
RT ET (past, unspecified)
ET = RT