Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Working in an ethical manner is not merely the field of
CEOs and owners but of employees as well.
A business is made up of its employees; so its critical
that each worker must understand the importance of
ethical business behavior if the company and the
individual workers aim success.
Employees who follow basic principles and code of
conducts will find that employers will be happy to hire
them, keep them on the job and promote them to higher
levels of responsibility which can lead them to job
satisfaction at the end.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Population
Employees of different organizations with job experience
of 1-2 year in any organization
Sample Size
Convenient sampling method is adopted to collect the data.
The sample size is 150.
Research Approach
Questionnaire
VARIABLES
Job Satisfaction
Ethical Training
Code Of Conduct
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Ethical
Training
Code of
Conduct
Facets of
Job
Satisfactio
n:
Pay
Promotio
n
Coworker
Superviso
r
Work
Overall
Job
Satisfacti
on
HYPOTHESIS
H1: An organization with strict code of conduct will influence
employees job satisfaction
H2: Employees at organization with a code of conduct will
report higher levels of job satisfaction
H3: Employees of organizations that provide ethical training
will report higher levels of job satisfaction
DEMOGRAPHICS
Gender
Valid
Cumulative
Frequency Percent
Male
113
71.5
71.5
71.5
Female
45
28.5
28.5
100.0
158
100.0
100.0
Total
Age
Valid
Cumulative
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Percent
20-30
80
50.6
50.6
50.6
31-40
47
29.7
29.7
80.4
41-50
25
15.8
15.8
96.2
Above 50
3.8
3.8
100.0
Total
158
100.0
100.0
Type Of Organization
Valid
Private
Sector
Public
Sector
Total
Cumulative
Frequency
Percent
153
96.8
96.8
96.8
3.2
3.2
100.0
158
100.0
100.0
Designation
Valid
Valid
Cumulative
Frequency
Percent
Percent
Percent
senior manager
50
31.6
31.6
31.6
middle manager
93
58.9
58.9
90.5
15
9.5
9.5
100.0
158
100.0
100.0
lower level
manager
Total
Qualification
Valid
Cumulative
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent
Percent
Bachelor
54
34.2
34.2
34.2
Masters
95
60.1
60.1
94.3
2.5
2.5
96.8
3.2
3.2
100.0
158
100.0
100.0
M.Phil/MS
Doctoral
Total
Cumulative
Valid
1-10
11-20
21-30
31-40
Total
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Percent
99
62.7
62.7
62.7
27
17.1
17.1
79.7
25
15.8
15.8
95.6
4.4
4.4
100.0
158
100.0
100.0
Cumulative
Valid
Regularly
Often
Sometimes
Ocassionally
Never
Total
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Percent
110
69.6
69.6
69.6
18
11.4
11.4
81.0
18
11.4
11.4
92.4
11
7.0
7.0
99.4
.6
.6
100.0
158
100.0
100.0
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Percent
Disagree
.6
.6
.6
Disagree
22
13.9
13.9
14.6
Neutral
21
13.3
13.3
27.8
Agree
72
45.6
45.6
73.4
Strongly Agree 42
26.6
26.6
100.0
Total
100.0
100.0
Strongly
158
CROSS TABULATION
Often
Total
13
14
Neutral
12
19
Agree
51
10
73
45
52
110
18
18
11
158
Satisfaction Disagree
With Job
Strongly
Agree
Total
Neutral
Agree
Agree
Total
13
14
Neutral
11
19
Agree
16
48
73
19
32
52
47
98
158
Satisfaction Disagree
With Job
Strongly
Agree
Total
Neutral
Agree
Agree
Total
Satisfaction Disagree
13
14
With Job
Neutral
14
19
Agree
10
29
32
73
46
52
13
47
96
158
Strongly
Agree
Total
The results showed that formal written code of conduct make a difference as
such organizations have highly satisfied employees.
CORRELATION
Correlations
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Unethical Behavior
Pearson Correlation
Satisfaction
With Job
Unethical
Behavior
1
-.008
.917
158
158
-.008
Sig. (2-tailed)
.917
158
158
Correlations
Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
Formal
Satisfaction Written Code
With Job
Of Conduct
1
N
Formal Written Code
Of Conduct
.238**
Pearson
Correlation
.003
158
158
.238**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.003
158
158
Correlations
Satisfaction With
Job
Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
Ethical Training
Satisfaction
With Job
Ethical
Training
1
.014
.861
158
158
Pearson
Correlation
.014
Sig. (2-tailed)
.861
158
158
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 0
Df
Sig. (2tailed)
Mean
Difference
Upper
56.381
157
.000
4.032
3.89
4.17
Ethical Training
73.196
157
.000
4.494
4.37
4.61
69.270
157
.000
4.329
4.21
4.45
Unethical Behavior
93.030
157
.000
4.544
4.45
4.64
The mean difference lies between the upper and the lower limit of the
confidence interval level of difference which proves the reliability of the
estimates of the data, hence proving alternate hypothesis.
CONCLUSION
The purpose of this study was to find out that whether code of conduct and
ethical training have an impact on employees job satisfaction or not.
The results of the study showed that organizations where code of conduct
are implemented and followed strictly have satisfied employees.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Code of conduct is probably the most common way that organizations can
influence ethical behavior.
A code of conduct and ethical training can also improve management, help
organizations to comply with government guidelines, and produce more
socially responsible organizations.
THANK YOU