Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Session 11
The
Introduction
A wholesale
Use
For
$45,000/$100,000 = .45
$15,000/$100,000 = .15
$25,000/$100,000 = .25
$15,000/$100,000 = .15
Written
...
The
S1
S2
S3 .5 .2 .1 .2
S4 .4 .4 .1 .1
Property
...
Now,
For
the case
V(2) = V(1) . P
V(2) = (.45 .15 .25 .15)
.5
.2
.1
.2
.4
.4
.1
.1
Continuing
.5
.2
.1
.2
.4
.4
.1
.1
Period
7 =V(7) = V(6) . P
V(7) = [ .69552 .30439 .00004 .000051 ]
Period 8 = V(8) = V(7) . P
V(8) = [ .6956 .3044 .0000 .0000 ]
Note that as it proceeded from period 2 to period 8,
the changes in the state probabilities become
smaller and smaller. The virtually constant state
probabilities that occur after a certain number of
periods are referred to as steady-state
probabilities.
Therefore, for accounts receivable problem, the
steady state are the same transition probabilities at
period 8, means that each probability being in its
category after a number of periods in the future is
independent toward its disposition in period 1.
Computing Steady State Probabilities
Category Of
Accounts
Receivable
Steady
-State
Probab
ility
Paid in full
Defaulted
Delinquent, 0-30 days
Delinquent, 31-90 days
.6956
.3044
.0000
.0000
Number of
Accounts
Receivable
1000
1000
1000
1000
x
x
x
x
.6956
.3044
.0000
.0000
=
=
=
=
695.6
304.4
0
0
Dollar Amount of
Accounts Receivable
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
x
x
x
x
.6956
.3044
.0000
.6956
=
=
=
=
$695,600
$304.400
$0
$0
S1
S2
S3
S1
.5
.3
.2
S2
.4
.3
.3
S3
.3
.3
.4
.05
.90)
State
Period
1
Period
2
Period
3
Period
4
Period
5
Period 6
(steady-state prob.)
S1
S2
S3
.3150
.3000
.3850
.3930
.3000
.3070
.4086
.3000
.2914
.4117
.3000
.2883
.4123
.3000
.2877
.4125
.3000
.2875
The results is
1 = .51 + .42 + .33
2 = .31 + .32 + .33
3 = .21 + .32 + .43
0
0
0
1
eq. 2
- 2.3 2 + 2.43
3 = 2.3/2.4 2
3 solve for 1 2 3
1 = 1 + 2 + 3
1 = 1.1/.8 2 + 2 + 2.4/2.4 2
1 = 3.333 2
2 = 1/3.333 = .3000
1 = 1.1/.8 2 = .4125
3 = 1 (.3000 + .4125) = .2875
Step
It
Observe also that both of other states, S3 and S4, are nonabsorbing but it is possible to move from any of these nonabsorbing states to the absorbing states, S1 and S2. Or as
analyzed, after period 6, the steady-state probabilities of both
states had been reduced to zero.
In particular, the probability of absorption by any absorbing state;
and the expected number of steps before the process is absorbed
can be determined.
To begin this process, initially the matrix of transition possibilities
is transform into the following general form.
P=
where
I = an r-by-r identity matrix defining the probabilities of staying within
an
absorbing state once it reached
O = an r-by-s null matrix indicating the probabilities of going from an
absorbing
state to a non-absorbing state.
P=
where
A = an s-by-r matrix containing the probabilities of going from a
non-absorbing
state to an absorbing state.
N = an s-by-s matrix showing the probabilities of going from one
non-absorbing
state to another non-absorbing state.
For accounts receivable case :
P=
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
.5 .2 .1 .2
.4 .4 .1 .1
First, determining (1 - N)
.9
-.2
-.1
.9
.1
.2
.1
.1
9/10
-2/10
-1/10
9/10
90/79
20/79
10/79
90/79
1.14
.25
.13
1.14
Beginning State
S3
S4
1.14
.25
.5
.2
.13
1.14
.4
.4
.67
.33
.52
.48
The interpretation is that (first row) there is .67 probability that a delinquent
account in state 3 will end up in state 1 (paid in full), and .33 probability a
delinquent account beginning in state 3 will end up in state 2 (bad debt).
The second row indicates that a delinquent account in state 4 will end up in
state 1 at .52 probability and state 2 at .48 probability.
Finally,
T` = T . Probability of absorption
T=
S3
S4
($25,000)
S1
($15,000)
S2
S3
S4
S3
.67
.33
($25,000)
S3
($15,000)
S4
.52
.48
($24,550)
S4
($15,450)